Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 46:1 (2022) ► pp.133–160
Against trivializing language description (and comparison)
Published online: 12 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19090.him
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19090.him
Abstract
This paper argues that recent proposals to sharply distinguish between language description and comparison are
ill-conceived for two reasons. First, comparison is unavoidable and hence an integral part of description. Second, the proposals
for a strict separation are based on an unrealistic and anachronistic conception of descriptive categories, assuming that these
can be defined in purely distributional terms. Here it is shown that description and comparison make use of, and struggle with,
the same kind of empirical evidence; namely, crosslinguistically identifiable properties of grammatical formatives and
constructions. If descriptive categories and crosslinguistic comparative concepts did not share such properties, language
comparison would be devoid of empirical content. Hence claims that they are ontologically different do not stand up to further
scrutiny. In short, said recent proposals portray language description and comparison in too-simplistic terms. They ignore, or at
least downplay, most of the complexities involved in both descriptive and comparative projects, many of which in fact result from
the inseparability of description and comparison.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.On the inevitability of comparison
- 3.Distributional analysis needs theoretical and substantive controls
- 4.Language comparison does not need its own set of concepts
- 4.1What is the problem with crosslinguistic comparative concepts?
- 4.2Can language-specific categories and crosslinguistic cluster concepts be ontologically different?
- 4.3Are crosslinguistic cluster concepts arbitrary?
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (55)
Arnold, Laura. 2017. A grammar of Ambel: An Austronesian language of Raja Ampat, west New Guinea. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD disseration.
Auwera, Johan van der & Kalyanamalini Sahoo. 2015. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories, such as they are. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 471. 136–173.
Beck, David. 2016. Some language-particular terms are comparative concepts. Linguistic Typology 201. 395–402.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 111. 239–251.
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2002. Autotypologizing databases and their use in fieldwork. In Austin, Peter, Helen Dry & Peter Witternburg (eds.), Proceedings of the International LREC Workshop on Resources and Tools in Field Linguistics, Las Palmas, 26 – 27 May 2002. Nijmegen: ISLE and DOBES. Available at [URL] (last access 20 March 2021).
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kamal K. Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky. 2015. The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PLoS ONE 10(8). e0132819.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1934. The non-uniqueness of phonemic solutions of phonetic systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 41. 36–397.
Corcoran, Katja, Jan Crusius & Thomas Mussweiler. 2011. Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In Derek Chadee (ed.), Theories in social psychology, 119–139. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2016. Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 201. 427–437.
Daniel, Michael & Edith Moravcsik. 2013. The associative plural. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (last access 28 September 2019).
Dryer, Matthew. 2018. The order of demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun. Language 941. 798–833.
Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (last access 30 January 2019).
Gil, David. 2016. Describing languoids: When Incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum. Linguistic Typology 201. 439–462.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963/66. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hagman, Roy S. 1977. Nama Hottentot grammar (Language Science Monograph 15). Bloomington: Indiana University.
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 861. 663–687.
. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniël Van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–114. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Haspelmath, Martin and the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Position of definite article in the noun phrase. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heuvel, Wilco van den. 2006. Biak: Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. PhD thesis Universiteit Leiden. Utrecht: LOT.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
2001. Articles. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, 831–841. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., Meytal Sandler, Jan Strunk & Volker Unterladstetter. 2018. On the universality of intonational phrases in spontaneous speech – a crosslinguistic interrater study. Phonology 351. 207–245.
Holdcroft, David. 1991. Saussure: Signs, systems, and arbitrariness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karubaba, Sara. 2008. Ambai inflectional and derivational morphology. Leiden: University of Leiden Master’s thesis.
Kirihio, J. Karter, Volker Unterladstetter, Apriani Arilaha, Freya Morigerowski, Alexander Loch, Yusuf Sawaki & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2009–2015. DoBeS Wooi documentation. DoBeS Archive MPI Nijmegen. Available at [URL] (last access 20 March 2020).
Lander, Yury & Peter Arkadiev. 2016. On the right of being a comparative concept. Linguistic Typology 201. 403–416.
Lazard, Gilbert. 2002. Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica 361. 141–190.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization (Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9). Second, revised edition. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt. Available at [URL] (last access 20 March 2021).
. 2018. Linguistic concepts and categories in language description and comparison. In Marina Chini & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), Typology, acquisition, grammaticalization studies, 27–50. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). 2013. Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (last access 26 September 2019).
Mussweiler, Thomas & Kai Epstude. 2009. Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1381. 1–21.
Normand, Claudine. 2004. System, arbitrariness, value. In Carol Sanders (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Saussure, 88–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pike, Kenneth L. 1947. Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Round, Erich R. & Greville G. Corbett. 2020. Comparability and measurement in typological science: The bright future for linguistics. Linguistic Typology 241. 489–525.
Sawaki, Yusuf W. 2016. A grammar of Wooi: An Austronesian language of Yapen Island, Western New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
Silverman, Daniel. 2006. A critical introduction to phonology: Functional and usage-based perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Corbett, Greville G.
G. Corbett, Greville
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
