Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 45:4 (2021) ► pp.888–921
The development of perfectivity in Khamti Shan
Published online: 2 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19001.ing
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19001.ing
Abstract
Khamti Shan features the marking of perfectivity comprised of three clause-final particles, one perfective and two
imperfectives, each emerging from the basic verbs, yau¹ ‘finish’, u⁵ ‘live’, and
nam⁵ ‘(be) extensive’. While the perfective category is straightforward, the imperfective category shows an
unusual bifurcation, the first imperfective marker accommodating continuatives and habituals and the second imperfective marker
working exclusively with the nominal predicate construction, clauses of potentiality (hortatives, futures), and the progressive
construction. All three particles of perfectivity develop from lexical sources, with the pathways ‘finish’ >
completive > perfective and ‘live’ > continuous/progressive > imperfective being
well-documented across languages. The pathway ‘extensive’ > imperfective, on the other hand, appears unique to Khamti
Shan. I motivate the usage of these perfectivity particles (primarily) with a semantic-cognitive analysis.
Keywords: Tai, Shan, Khamti, perfective, imperfective, aspect, grammaticalization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background on Khamti Shan
- 2.1The language and its speakers
- 2.2Typological characteristics
- 2.3Data
- 3.Lexical underpinnings
- 4.The perfectivity particles in context
- 4.1Perfective (pfv)
- 4.2First Imperfective (ipfv.i)
- 4.3Second Imperfective (ipfv.ii)
- 5.Grammaticalization of the perfectivity particles
- 5.1The yau¹ pathway
- 5.2The u⁵ pathway
- 5.3The nam⁵ pathway
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (42)
Borchers, Dörte. 2016. Marking anteriority, perfect and perfectivity in languages of mainland Southeast Asia – concepts, linguistic area. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Conceptualizations of time, 243–270. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40(2). 257–271.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chamberlain, J. R. 1975. A new look at the history and classification of the Tai languages. In Jimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney, 49–66. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.
Chau Khouk Manpoong. 1993. New Tai reader. Chongkham, Arunachal Pradesh: Tai Literature Committee. 21 Volumes. (in Khamti).
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013. The perfect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL], Accessed on 2019-07-24.)
DeLancey, Scott. 2002. Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Parasession on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics, 55–72. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
. 2011. Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 341–359. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 463–489.
Diller, Anthony V. N. 2006. Thai serial verbs: Cohesion and culture. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 160–177. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Diller, Anthony V. N., Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongshian Luo (eds.). 2008. The Tai-Kadai languages. London/New York: Routledge.
Dockum, Rikker. 2014. A tale of two Khamtis: Language classification in Southwestern Tai. SYNC 2014. Stony Brook University.
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2019a. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [URL] (Accessed on 2019-05-15).
(eds.). 2019b. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [URL] (Accessed on 2019-07-17).
Edmondson, Jerold A. 2008. Shan and other northern tier southwest Tai languages of Myanmar and China: Themes and variations. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongshian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 184–206. London/New York: Routledge.
Edmondson, Jerold A. & David B. Solnit. 1997a. Introduction. In Jerold A. Edmondson & David B. Solnit (eds.), Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch, 1–27. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.
. 1997b. Comparative Shan. In Jerold A. Edmondson & David B. Solnit (eds.), Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch, 337–360. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.
Enfield, Nick J. 2005. Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 341. 181–206.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1991. The de dicto domain in language. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, vol. 11, 219–251. Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Harris, Jimmy G. 1976. Notes on Khamti Shan. In Thomas W. Gething, Jimmy G. Harris & Pranee Kullavanijaya (eds.), Tai linguistics in honor of Fang-Kuei Li, 113–141. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inglis, Douglas. 2014. This here thing: Specifying morphemes an³, nai¹, and mai² in Tai Khamti reference-point constructions. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta dissertation.
. 2017a. Myanmar-based Khamti Shan orthography. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 10(1). xlvii–lxi. [URL]
. 2017b. Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction: A Tibeto-Burman influence? Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40(2). 133–160.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenny, Mathias. 2001. The aspect system of Thai. In Karen H. Ebert & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Aktionsart and aspectotemporality in non-European languages, 97–140. Zürich: ASAS-Verlag.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Nuttanart Muansuwan. 2005. The syntax of aspect in Thai. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 231, 335–380.
Kusalanda (Sao) & (Sao) Namnaeu. 2013. Tai Khamti-Burmese dictionary. Khamti Shan Literature Committee and SIL International. Namti: Myanmar.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2011. Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 79–91. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Matisoff, James A. 1972. Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 11, 237–257. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Morey, Stephen D. 2002. The Tai languages of Assam – A grammar and texts. Clayton, VI: Monash University dissertation.
2005b. Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28(2). 166–169.
2008. The Tai languages of Assam. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmonson & Yongxian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 207–253. London/New York: Routledge.
Thiengburanathum, Prang. 2013. Thai motion verbs paj and maa: Where tense and aspect meet. Studies in Language 37(4). 810–845.
Thepkanjana, Kingkarn. 1986. Serial verb constructions in Thai. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan dissertation.
