Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 19:1 (1995) ► pp.244–248
Book review
. Duration in English: A basic choice, illustrated in comparison with Dutch [Topics in English Linguistics, 5]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. x + 146 pp. DM 78. ISBN 3-11-012921-3
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1995
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19.1.10kir
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19.1.10kir
References (12)
Daalder, Saskia; and Verhagen, Arie. 1993. “Dutch tenses and the analysis of a literary text: The case of Marga Minco’s De val
”. In: Kirsner (ed), 139–150.
Geerts, G.; Haeseryn, W.; Rooij, J. de; and Toorn, M. C. van den (eds). 1984. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff and Leuven: Wolters.
Gvozdanović, J.; and Janssen, Th. (eds). 1991. The function of tense in texts. [Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Verhandelingen, Afd. Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, deel 1441] Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, North-Holland.
Haan, S. de. 1991. “Meaning and use of the Dutch perfect”. In: Gvozdanović; and Janssen (eds), 143–156.
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1989. “Preteritum of perfectum? O tempora, o sores!” Neerlandica Extra Muros 531: 50–60.
Janssen, Th. A. J. M. 1991. “Preterite as definite description”. In: Gvozdanović; and Janssen (eds), 157–181.
Kirsner, Robert S. (ed). 1993. The Low Countries and beyond. [Publications of the American Association for Netherlandic Studies 51]. Lanham, New York, and London: University Press of America.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
