Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 18:1 (1994) ► pp.241–252
Book review
. Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps, Studies in natural language and linguistic theory. Kluwer, 1991. xi+213 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1994
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.14hul
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.14hul
References (17)
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, [L.I. Monograph 61]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Guéron, J. 1992. “La possession inaliénable et l’aspect locatif” In: Tasmowski and Zribi-Hertz (eds).
Haegeman, L. 1992. Generative syntax: Theory and description. A case study from West Flemish. Cambridge UK.: Cambridge University Press.
Hulk, A. C. J. 1984. “La syntaxe du pronom ‘en’ dans la construction quantitative” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 131: 167–198.
Lefebvre, C. (ed). 1982. La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire. Approche formelle et fonctionnelle. [Langues et Sociétés.] Gouvernement du Québec. Office de la langue française.
Pollock, J. -Y. 1992. “Opérateurs nuls, dont, questions indirectes et théorie de la quantification” In: Tasmowski and Zribi-Hertz (eds).
