Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 45:4 (2021) ► pp.866–887

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A typology of depiction marking

The prosody of Japanese ideophones and beyond

ORCiD logo with link | Nagoya University
Published online: 30 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17029.aki
Abstract
Ideophones and direct quotations are “depictive” signs, or vivid re-enactments of what they signify. Pursuing the typology of linguistic depiction, the current study proposes a three-way classification of depiction marking strategies: framing, foregrounding, and backgrounding. While well-known formal characteristics of ideophones, such as prosodic prominence and quotative constructions, illustrate framing and foregrounding, this paper discusses low-pitched quotative indexes in Japanese as backgrounding-type depiction markers. These quotatives immediately follow ideophones and exclamatory quotations and set them off. They also underlie the exceptional pitch pattern of heavy syllables in ideophones.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Depiction and description
  • 3.Three types of depiction marking
  • 4.Prosodic backgrounding in Japanese
    • 4.1Exclamatory quotations
    • 4.2Ideophones
  • 5.Exceptional pitch pattern in Japanese ideophones
    • 5.1Issues
    • 5.2Experimental methods
    • 5.3Experimental results
    • 5.4Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (51)
References
Akinaga, Kazue. 2001. Shinmeikai nihongo akusento jiten [A Shinmeikai dictionary of Japanese accent]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi. 2015. Ideophones and reported discourse as depictive signs. Gengo Bunka Kyōdō Kenkyū Purojekuto 2014: Shizen Gengo e no Rironteki Apurōchi [Osaka University Joint Project on Language & Culture 2014: Theoretical Approaches to Natural Language]. 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Modality-specificity of iconicity: The case of motion ideophones in Japanese. In Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Operationalizing iconicity, 3–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.). 2019. Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Takeshi Usuki. 2016. A constructional account of the “optional” quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52(2). 245–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alderete, John & Alexei Kochetov. 2017. Integrating sound symbolism with core grammar: The case of expressive palatalization. Language 93(4). 731–766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bodomo, Adams B. 2006. The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In John Mugane, John P. Hutchison & Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African languages and linguistics in broad perspectives, 203–213. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2006. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3). 324–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Depicting in communication. In Peter Hagoort (ed.), Human language: From genes and brains to behavior, 235–247. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4). 764–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [URL] (last access 11 August 2020).
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 81. 440–447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2). 119–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morton H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10). 603–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge. 2018. Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 716. 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico. 2017. L-syntax and phono-symbolism: On the status of ideophones in complex predicates. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(2). 243–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 2018. Ideophones and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko Saito. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.). 1994. Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirose, Yukio. 1995. Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua 951. 223–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2017. Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(2). 196–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2014. Grammar of the internal expressive sentences in Japanese: Observations and explorations. In Kaori Kabata & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds.), Usage-based approaches to Japanese grammar: Towards the understanding of human language, 55–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kadooka, Ken-Ichi. 2007. Nihongo onomatope goi ni okeru keitaiteki/on’inteki taikeisei ni tsuite [On the morphological and phonological systematicity of Japanese ideophonic lexemes]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 2007. Explorations in the conceptual semantics of mimetic verbs. In Bjarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Smith (eds.), Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese, 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori & Lawrence Schourup. 1996. Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35(2). 379–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics 39(2). 419–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 1999. Mora and syllable. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 31–61. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. The phonological structure of Japanese mimetics and motherese. In Kimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives, 35–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nasu, Akio. 2002. Nihongo onomatope no gokeisei to inritsu kōzō [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese ideophones]. Ibaraki: University of Tsukuba PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1932. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadanobu, Toshiyuki. 2015. Four types of linguistic resources for variable speaking units in common Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 19(2). 109–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasamoto, Ryoko. 2019. Onomatopoeia and relevance: Communication of impressions via sound. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2017. The significance of the grammatical study of Japanese mimetics. In Noriko Iwasaki, Peter Sells & Kimi Akita (eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics: Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation, 7–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shin’ichi & Haruo Kubozono. 1999. Nihongo no hatsuon kyōshitsu: Riron to renshū [Introduction to Japanese pronunciation: Theory and practice]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Arthur Lewis & Youngah Do. 2019. Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 721. 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Usuki, Takeshi & Kimi Akita. 2015. What’s in a mimetic?: On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. In Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity: East meets West, 109–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voeltz, Friedrich K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich. 1927. Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Franz Boas (ed.), Festschrift Meinhof, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Akinbo, Samuel Kayode
2025. Iconicity of grammatical tonal polarity and reduplication in Nigerian Pidgin. Journal of Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Guitang, Guillaume
2025. Ideophones in Gizey grammar. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Erben Johansson, Niklas
2024. Prominence effects in vocal iconicity: Implications for lexical access and language change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
McLean, Bonnie, Michael Dunn & Mark Dingemanse
2023. Two measures are better than one: combining iconicity ratings and guessing experiments for a more nuanced picture of iconicity in the lexicon. Language and Cognition 15:4 ► pp. 716 ff. DOI logo
Yasui, Eiko
2023. Japanese onomatopoeia in bodily demonstrations in a traditional dance instruction: A resource for synchronizing body movements. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Hao, Zhoushao & Gengxin Sun
2022. Naive Bayesian Prediction of Japanese Annotated Corpus for Textual Semantic Word Formation Classification. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue