Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 42:3 (2018) ► pp.529–561

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Gender agreement alternation in Aqusha Dargwa

A case against information structure

 | University of Bamberg | National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17018.gan
Abstract
The article discusses gender agreement alternation in Aqusha Dargwa (Nakh-Daghestanian, the Caucasus, Russian Federation). The phenomenon is observed in periphrastic verbal forms with transitive verbs where gender agreement on the auxiliary can show the gender features of either the ergative subject or the absolutive direct object. Considering existing analyses of the phenomenon in terms of information structure, I argue that agreement alternation cannot be captured by sentence-topic-oriented accounts. I also discuss a structural proposal developed by Sumbatova, Nina R. & Yuri A. Lander. 2014. Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: grammatičeskij očerk, voprosy sintaksisa. Moscow: Jazyki slav’anskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and show that their analysis cannot be maintained in full. Instead, I propose a modified analysis according to which only subject agreement, but not object agreement, results from a cross-clausal referential dependency between the ergative subject of the lexical verb and the absolutive subject of the matrix restructuring verb. On this view, agreement alternation may be assimilated to the familiar distinction between ergative and biabsolutive constructions found elsewhere in Nakh-Daghestanian.
Article outline
  • 1.Problem setting
  • 2.Previous accounts of alternating agreement: An overview
    • 2.1 Van den Berg (1999): Default Ergative Hypothesis
    • 2.2 Sumbatova and Lander (2014)
  • 3.Agreement controller is not discourse topic or old information
  • 4.Agreement controller is not sentence topic
    • 4.1Non-topicable quantifiers can control auxiliary gender agreement
    • 4.2Thetic sentences do not imply default agreement
    • 4.3Focus-marked arguments can control auxiliary gender agreement
    • 4.4“Defective” controllers of gender agreement on the auxiliary
  • 5.Syntax of gender agreement
  • 6.A structural parallel
  • 7.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (25)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2006. Introduction: Passivization and typology. Form vs. function – a confined survey into the research status quo. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology: Form and function, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belyaev, Oleg. 2016. Ergative gender agreement in Dargwa “backward control” or feature sharing? In Doug Arnold, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King, & Stefan Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 83–103. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Information Structure Conditions on the Agreement Controller in Dargwa. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG’17 Conference, University of Konstanz, 66–82. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, Cornelia & Stefan Hinterwimmer. 2010. The interpretation of topical indefinites as direct and indirect aboutness topics. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, 89–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endriss, Cornelia. 2009. Quantificational Topics. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forker, Diana. 2012. The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46(1). 75–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie, Michael Goncalves, Maria Polinsky, & Nina Radkevich. 2014. The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez. Lingua 1501. 137–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction. Volume II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic Notions of Information Structure. In Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information StructureVolume 6: The notions of information structure, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Quantification and information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 251–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2016. Agreement in Archi from a minimalist perspective. In Oliver Bond, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina, & Greville Corbett (eds.), Archi: complexities of agreement in cross-theoretical perspective, 184–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam. 2002. Backward Control. Linguistic Inquiry 33(2). 245–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising. Syntax 9(2). 171–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potsdam, Eric & Maria Polinsky. 2012. Backward Raising. Syntax 15(1). 75–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and Linguistics. An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Philosophica 271. 53–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina R. & Yuri A. Lander. 2014. Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: grammatičeskij očerk, voprosy sintaksisa. Moscow: Jazyki slav’anskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Strategies for Scope Taking. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 109–154. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma. 1999. Gender and person agreement in Akusha Dargi. Folia Linguistica 33(1–2). 153–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Dargi folktales. Oral stories from the Caucasus. With an introduction to Dargi grammar. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115(1–2). 147–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kaye, Steven
2025. Clausal agreement on adverbs in Andi. Linguistics 63:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Forker, Diana
2019. Elevation as a category of grammar: Sanzhi Dargwa and beyond. Linguistic Typology 23:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Forker, Diana
2019. Grammatical relations in Sanzhi Dargwa. In Argument Selectors [Typological Studies in Language, 123], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue