Cover not available

Article published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp.1–26

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Zero morphemes in paradigms

 | Shanghai Jiaotong University
 | Zhejiang University of Science and Technology
Published online: 6 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16085.ger
Abstract
This paper sheds a new light on the notion of zero morphemes in inflectional paradigms: on their formal definition (§ 1), on the way of counting them (§ 2–3) and on the way of conceptualizing them at a deeper, mathematical level (§ 4). We define (zero) morphemes in the language of cartesian set products and propose a method of counting them that applies the lexical relations of homophony, polysemy, allomorphy and synonymy to inflectional paradigms (§ 2). In this line, two homophonic or synonymous morphemes are different morphemes, while two polysemous and allomorphic morphemes count as one morpheme (§ 3). In analogy to the number zero in mathematics, zero morphemes can be thought of either as minimal elements in a totally ordered set or as neutral element in a set of opposites (§ 4). Implications for language acquisition are discussed in the conclusion (§ 5).
Article outline
  • 1.Zero morphemes and paradigms
  • 2.Polysemy, homophony, allomorphy and synonymy
  • 3.The count of zero morphemes
    • 3.1Paradigms with one zero morpheme
    • 3.2Paradigms with two zero morphemes
    • 3.3Paradigms with multiple zero morphemes
  • 4.The zero morpheme and the zero number
    • 4.1Zero morphemes as minimal values
    • 4.2Zero morphemes as neutral element
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Anderson, Stephen (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher. 1985. Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Natural morphology: The organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In Charles Ferguson & Thom Huebner (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, 67–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The grammaticization of zero: Asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. 1998. Morphology in language acquisition. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology, 374–389. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, David. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 2012. On the acquisition of inflectional morphology: introduction. Morphology 221. 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, David. 2009. Mamainde Grammar: A Northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. Utrecht, Netherlands: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel. 2004. A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, Erica & Florimon van Putte. 1989. Forms are silver, nothing is gold. Folia Linguistica Historica 8(1–2). 365–384.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, 73–113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. Language Universals: with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia. 1985. A grammar of Loniu (Austronesian, Papua New Guinea languages). Lawrence KS, University of Kansas dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Luke. 2005. A History of Mathematics: From Mesopotamia to Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hume, Elisabeth. 2011. Markedness. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Ricce (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Volume I1, 79–106. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, William. 1958. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, George. 2011. The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics (3rd edn). Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kukla, André (2005). Ineffability and Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert. 2000. The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Robert Vago & Anna Fenyvesi, A. 1998. Hungarian. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurłyowicz, Jerzy. 1947. La nature des procès dits analogiques. Acta Linguistica 51: 121–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Grammar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lojenga, Constance. 1994. Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemaréchal, Alain. 1997. Zéro(s). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1990. A Functional Grammar of Gooniyandi. Studies in language companion series 22. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 2002. Towards a formal concept ‘zero linguistic sign’. In Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang Dressler, Oskar Pfeiffer and Maria Voeikova (eds.), Selected papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, 24–28 February 2000, pp. 241–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Zero sign in morphology. In David Beck (ed.), Aspects of the Theory of Morphology, 469–516. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Press, Ian. 1986. A grammar of Modern Breton. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton Raatikainen, Panu. (2018), Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems. In Edward Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), [URL] (18 September, 2019).
Siewierska, Anna. 2005. Third person zero of verbal person marking. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structure, 414–417. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ([URL]) (18 September, 2019).
. 2010. Person asymmetries in zero expression and grammatical function. In Franck Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, 471–485. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
So-Hartmann, Helga. 2009. A Descriptive Grammar of Daai Chin. STEDT Monographs 7. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staal, Frits. 1969. Sanskrit philosophy of language. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 5: Linguistics in South Asia, 499–531. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas & Gregory Stump. 2007. Paradigm Function Morphology and the morphology/syntax interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 383–421. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional Paradigms: Content and Form at the Syntax-Morphology Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory & Raphael Finkel. 2013. Morphological Typology: From Word to Paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, Joseph-Sung Park & Charles Li. 2006. A reference grammar of Wappo. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, David. 1983. A grammar of Huallaga Quechua. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Paul. 2008. Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Ling. 2015. The affix ordering in typological perspective. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kerimoğlu, Caner
2024. Dilbilimsel Sıfırlar: Mit mi, Gerçek mi?. Dil Araştırmaları 18:35 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gerner, Matthias
2022. Derivational zero affixes worldwide. Lingua 278 ► pp. 103414 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue