Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 14:1 (1990) ► pp.234–248
Book review
. Configurationality in syntax. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo: Reidel, 1987. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiado, 1987. 268 pp. $ 69.00
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 January 1990
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.11mor
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.11mor
References (14)
Abraham, Werner; and de Meij, Sjaak (eds). 1986. Topic, focus, and configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistik Aktuell 41].
Cole, Peter; and Sadock, Jerrold M. (eds). 1977. Grammatical relations. New York, San Francisco: Academic Press [Syntax and Semantics 81].
Farkas, Donka F.; and Sadock, Jerrold M. 1989. “Preverb climbing in Hungarian.” Language 65(2):318–338.
Horvath, Julia. 1981. Aspects of Hungarian syntax and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 1986. “Remarks on the configurationality issue.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986. 65–87.
Hunyadi, László. 1986. “The expression of logical scope in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 89–102.
Kenesei, István. 1986. “On the logic of word order in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 143–159.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1986. “The order and scope of operators in the Hungarian sentence.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 181–214.
Li, Charles N.; and Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. “Subject and topic: A new typology of language.” In: Li (ed.) 1976: 457–489.
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1984. “The place of direct objects among the noun phrase constituents of Hungarian.” In: Plank (ed.) 1984: 55–85.
