Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 12:1 (1988) ► pp.194–199

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Bernard Comrie. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. andÖsten Dahl. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford / New York: Blackwell, 1985.

Reviewed by
 | BSO/Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Published online: 1 January 1988
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.15sch
References (12)
References
Anderson Östman, Carin; Anna Malmberg (eds.). 1986. Svenska i tid och otid. Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersson, Sven-Gunnar. 1972. Aktionalität im Deutschen. Eine Untersuchung unter Vergleich mit dem russischen Aspektsystem. [Vol. 11 = Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Germanistica Upsaliensia 101].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1978. On the definition of the telic/atelic (bounded/nonbounded) distinction. = Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 361.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen; Fred Karlsson. 1976. “Verbal aspect and object marking: a comparison between Finnish and Russian.” International Review of Slavic Linguistics 11:1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garey, Howard B. 1957. “Verbal aspect in French.” Language 331:91–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1914. “Tid og tempus.” Oversigt over det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger 1914, pp. 367–420. København: Høst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin (8th ed. 1958).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press / London: Collier-Macmillan (new ed. 1966).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, Klaus. 1982. Aktiv und Passiv im Deutschen und Schwedischen. Kiel: SAIS Arbeitsberichte aus dem Seminar für Allgemeine und Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft 51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “Är svenskans perfekt aspektuellt?” In: Anderson Östman; Malmberg (eds.) 1986:197–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V. 1972. Russkij jazyk. Moscow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue