Cover not available

Review published In: Studies in Language
Vol. 10:1 (1986) ► pp.151–166

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Christian Lehmann. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen – Theorie seiner Funktionen – Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1984. . [Language Universals Series, 3]. XVI + 438 pp. DM 96,-.

Reviewed by
 | University of Antwerp (UFSIA)
Published online: 1 January 1986
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.10.1.10auw
References (19)
References
Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, B. T. 1978. “Some Universals of Relative Clause Structure”, in J. H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language. Volume 4. Syntax. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 375–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. 1976. “The adjoined relative clause in Australia”, in R. M. W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institue of Aboriginal Studies. 78–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechtes. Berlin: Königl. Akad. d. Wiss.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie. 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry 81.63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. “Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy”, Language 551.333–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1979. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983a. “Rektion und syntaktische Relationen”, Folia Linguistica XVII1.339–378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983b. “The Present State of Linguistic Typology”, In S. Hattori & K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo. 950–956.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. & B. Blake. 1981. Language Typology. Cross-linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiler, H. 1960. Relativsatz, Attribut und Apposition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978. “The Cologne project on language universals: Questions, objectives, and prospects”, in H. Seiler (ed.) Language Universals. Tübingen: Narr. 11–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobler, A. 1896. “Relativsatz als prädikative Bestimmung”, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 201.55–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, J. 1984. “ That COMP-fusions”, in C. Brugmann & M. Macaulay (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. 660–673.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985a. “Relative that – a centennial dispute”, Journal of Linguistics 11. 149–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985b. “The predicative relatives of French perception verbs”. In A. M. Bolkestein. e.a. (eds.) Predicates and terms in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht & Cinnaminson: Foris. 219–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue