Cover not available

Article published In: Morphology and emotions across the world's languages
Edited by Maïa Ponsonnet and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 42:1] 2018
► pp. 182–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The encoding of emotions in Kakataibo (Panoan)

Morphological markers and prosodic patterns

 | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Published online: 19 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00007.zar
Abstract
Kakataibo (a Panoan language spoken in Peru) encodes emotional meanings by means of various morphological and prosodic devices. Some of them may be related to pragmatic implications (like the expression of affection by the diminutive), but others constitute dedicated emotional markers (as is the case of the illocutionary suffixes, augmentative nominalizers and nasalized imperatives). The fact that almost all the emotional markers carry nasalization is interpreted here as a possible case of language-internal sound-symbolism between nasalization and (negative) emotional meanings. This paper also shows that in Kakataibo we find a systematic pattern according to which dedicated emotional markers express negative emotions and never positive ones. Both the phonological and the semantic systems described in this paper may reveal patterns relevant for the cross-linguistic research on the grammar of emotions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Kakataibo language and its speakers
  • 3.Data
  • 4.The expression of emotions in Kakataibo
    • 4.1Illocutionary suffixes
      • 4.1.1Complaining negators
      • 4.1.2-iéé ‘accusatory speech’
    • 4.2Augmentative nominalizers
    • 4.3Nasalization alone
    • 4.4Expressive uses of the diminutive -ra ~ -ratsu ‘diminutive’
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The semantic domain of emotions in Kakataibo
    • 5.2Prosody, nasalization and the expression of emotions in Kakataibo
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (19)
References
Austin, J. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
d’Ans, Marcel. 1973. Reclasificación de las lenguas pano y datos glotocronológicos para la etnohistoria de la Amazonía peruana. Revista del Museo Nacional XXXIX1. 349–369.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleck, David W. 2013. Panoan languages and linguistics. Anthropological papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 991.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandi, Nicola. 2002. Development and spread of augmentative suffixes in the Mediterranean area. In P. Ramat & T. Stolz (eds.), Mediterranean Languages, 171–190. Bochum: Dr. Brockmeyer University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). 2007. II Censo de Comunidades Indígenas de la Amazonia. [URL]
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loos, Eugene. 1999. Pano. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 227–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Németh, Boglárka & Anna Sőrés. Evaluative morphology in the verbal domain. Complex verbs suffixed by -kVdik in Hungarian. In Maïa Ponsonnet & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Morphology and emotions across the world’s languages. Special issue of Studies in Language 42(1).
Shell, Olive A. 1965. Pano reconstruction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. Estudios Panos III: Las Lenguas Pano y su Reconstrucción. Yarinacocha, Pucallpa: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2009. Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t: the case of relativization. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity, 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 1992. The use of the diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics 171. 155–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ponsonnet, Maïa. 2014. The language of emotions. The case of Dalabon (Australia). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. Lingua mentalis: the semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011a. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. Melbourne: LaTrobe University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Hacia una dialectología del idioma Cashibo-Cacataibo. Lexis 35(1). 5–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Tessmanns Nokamán: a linguistic investigation of a mysterious Panoan group. Cadernos de Etnolinguistica 5(2). 1–46. Recuperado de [URL]
. 2015a. The encoding of addressee’s perspective in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru). Language Typology and Universals (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 68(2). 143–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Bosquejo gramatical de la lengua iskonawa. Boston: RCLLGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dobrushina, Nina
2024. Evaluation between grammar and context. Diachronica 41:5 ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue