Cover not available

In:Pluricentricity and Pluriareality: Dialects, Variation, and Standards
Edited by Philipp Meer and Ryan Durgasingh
[Studies in Language Variation 32] 2025
► pp. 1–14

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Modeling variation

Pluricentricity and pluriareality — The debate surrounding both models, and potentials for their complementarity

ORCiD logo with link | University of Münster, Germany | University of Campinas, Brazil
ORCiD logo with link | Ruhr University Bochum | University of Münster, Germany
Published online: 16 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.32.01mee
Abstract
The question of how to conceptualize variation in languages with more than one standard variety, such as English, Dutch, or German, has been a central one to variation linguistics. Variation in these languages is sometimes modeled according to two opposed approaches: pluricentricity and pluriareality, though not uncontroversially. The present chapter first introduces the pluricentricity/pluriareality debate and then identifies several aspects that warrant a more extensive and thorough discussion of their potential complementarity. It then introduces the volume, which is the first of its kind to consolidate pluricentric and pluriareal perspectives on modeling standard language variation in a systematic manner. A major contribution of the volume lies in the fact that most chapters seek to integrate both concepts in modeling variation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overview of individual contributions
  • Note
  • References
References (69)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allsopp, Richard. 1996. Dictionary of Caribbean English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich. 1995. Die deutsche Sprache in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Plurinationalität oder Pluriarealität? Begriffliche und terminologische Präzisierungsvorschläge zur Plurizentrizität des Deutschen — mit Ausblick auf ein Wörterbuchprojekt. In Peter Ernst & Franz Patocka (eds.), Deutsche Sprache in Raum und Zeit, 313–323. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2014. Enregistering pluricentric German. In Augusto S. d. Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias. 2012. Attitudes towards Englishes in Sri Lanka. World Englishes 31(3). 279–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias & Christopher Koch. 2016. Attitudes towards Englishes in India. World Englishes 35(1). 118–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolander, Brook. 2020. World Englishes and transnationalism. In Daniel Schreier, Marianne Hundt & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, 676–701. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.). 2020. Modelling world Englishes: A joint approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial varieties. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, Alexander Kautzsch & Edgar W. Schneider. 2018. From colonial dynamism to current transnationalism: A unified view on postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. In Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), Modelling World Englishes in the 21st century: Assessing the interplay of emancipation and globalization of ESL varieties, 15–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael G. (ed.). 1992. Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. The German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar. 2013. Towards endonormative standards of English in the Caribbean: A study of students’ beliefs and school curricula. Language, Culture and Curriculum 26(2). 109–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. English in the Caribbean: Variation, style and standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar, Stephanie Hackert, Eva C. Hänsel, Alexander Laube, Mahyar Hejrani & Catherine Laliberté. 2021. The norm orientation of English in the Caribbean: A comparative study of newspaper writing from ten countries. American Speech. Advance online publication. 1–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devonish, Hubert & Ewart A. T. Thomas. 2012. Standards of English in the Caribbean. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Standards of English: Codified varieties around the world, 179–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2019a. The Pluricentricity Debate. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Debunking “pluri-areality”: On the pluricentric perspective of national varieties. Journal of Linguistic Geography 7(2). 98–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebner, Jakob. 2014. Österreichisches Deutsch: Ein Klärungsversuch. In Bundesministerium für Bildung (ed.), Österreichisches Deutsch als Unterrichts — und Bildungssprache, 7–9. Vienna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan & Christa Dürscheid. 2017. Areale grammatische Variation in den Gebrauchsstandards des Deutschen. In Marek Konopka & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds.), Grammatische Variation: Empirische Zugänge und theoretische Modellierung, 85–104. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Christa Dürscheid & Arne Ziegler. 2017. Zur grammatischen Pluriarealität der deutschen Gebrauchsstandards — oder: Über die Grenzen des Plurizentrizitätsbegriffs. Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 136. 69–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan & Stefan Kleiner. 2019. Forschungsergebnisse Zur Arealen Variation Im Standarddeutschen. In Joachim Herrgen & Jürgen E. Schmidt (eds.), Deutsch: Sprache und Raum — ein Internationales Handbuch der Sprachvariation, 159–184. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan & Konstantin Niehaus. 2014. The standardization of a modern pluriareal language: Concepts and corpus designs for German and beyond. Orð og tunga 16. 47–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Tobias Bernaisch. 2016. Exploring epicentres empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 37(1). 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike. 2012. Standards of English in West Africa. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Standards of English: Codified varieties around the world, 213–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie. 2022. The epicentre model and American influence on Bahamian Englishes. World Englishes 41(3). 361–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hänsel, Eva C. Michael Westphal, Philipp Meer & Dagmar Deuber. 2022. Context matters: Grenadian students’ attitudes towards newscasters’ and teachers’ accents. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 37(1). 16–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch & Stefan T. Gries. 2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41(1). 111–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011. Indian English — An emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia 129(3–4). 258–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2013. The diversification of English: Old, new and emerging epicentres. In Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), English as a contact language, 182–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Randolph Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1978. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, 2nd edn. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leitner, Gerhard. 1992. English as a pluricentric language. In Michael G. Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations, 179–237. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. World Englishes: From Methodological Nationalism to a Global Perspective. In Britta Schneider, Theresa Heyd & Mario Saraceni (eds.), Bloomsbury World Englishes Volume 1: Paradigms, 27–45: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meer, Philipp & Dagmar Deuber. 2020. Standard English in Trinidad: Multinormativity, translocality, and implications for the Dynamic Model and the EIF Model. In Sarah Buschfeld & Alexander Kautzsch (eds.), Modelling world Englishes: A joint approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial varieties, 274–297. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meer, Philipp & Ryan Durgasingh. 2024. Sociophonetic and morphosyntactic variation in Caribbean creoles and Englishes. In Kingsley Bolton (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meer, Philipp, Robert Fuchs, Dagmar Deuber, Véronique Lacoste & Eva C. Hänsel. 2023. Prosodic variation of English in Dominica, Grenada, and Trinidad. World Englishes 42(1). 48–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meer, Philipp, Michael Westphal, Eva C. Hänsel & Dagmar Deuber. 2019. Trinidadian secondary school students’ attitudes toward accents of Standard English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34(1). 83–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4). 530–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser, Hugo. 1959. Neuere und neueste Zeit. Von den 80er Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts zur Gegenwart. In Friedrich Maurer & Friedrich Stroh (eds.), Deutsche Wortgeschichte (Vol. 2). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muhr, Rudolf. 1997. Zur Terminologie und Methode der Beschreibung plurizentrischer Sprachen und deren Varietäten am Beispiel des Deutschen. In Rudolf Muhr & Richard Schrodt (eds.), Österreichisches Deutsch und andere nationale Varietäten plurizentrischer Sprachen in Europa: Empirische Analysen, 40–67. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Linguistic dominance and non-dominance in pluricentric languages: A typology. In Rudolf Muhr (ed.), Non-dominant varieties of pluricentric languages: Getting the picture, 23–48. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Misconceptions about pluricentric languages and pluricentric theory — an overview of 40 years. In Rudolf Muhr & Benjamin Meisnitzer (eds.), Pluricentric languages and non-dominant varieties worldwide: New pluricentric languages — old problems, 17–56. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, Cecil L. Z. G. Proshina, Daniel R. Davis, Braj B. Kachru & Yamuna Kachru (eds.). 2020. Handbook of world Englishes, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niehaus, Konstantin. 2015. Areale Variation in der Syntax des Standarddeutschen: Ergebnisse zum Sprachgebrauch und zur Frage Plurizentrik vs. Pluriarealität. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 82(2). 133–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Pam, Adam Smith & Tobias Bernaisch. 2019. Shared Lexical Innovations in Australian and New Zealand English. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 40(2). 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platt, John, Heidi Weber & Ho M. Lian. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platt, John T. & Heidi Weber. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, features, functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pohl, Heinz D. 1997. Gedanken zum Österreichischen Deutsch (als Teil der „pluriarealen” deutschen Sprache). In Rudolf Muhr & Richard Schrodt (eds.), Österreichisches Deutsch und andere nationale Varietäten plurizentrischer Sprachen in Europa: Empirische Analysen, 67–87. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pride, John (ed.) (1982). New Englishes. Rowley, MA: Newsbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiffenstein, Ingo. 2001. Das Problem der nationalen Varietäten. Rezensionsaufsatz zu Ulrich Ammon: Die deutsche Sprache in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Das Problem der nationalen Varietäten, Berlin/New York 1995. Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie (1). 78–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruette, Tom, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts. 2014. Lexical variation in aggregate perspective. In Augusto S. d. Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scharloth, Joachim. 2005. Asymmetrische Plurizentrizität und Sprachbewusstsein: Einstellungen der Deutschschweizer zum Standarddeutschen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 33(2–3).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheuringer, Hermann. 1996. Das Deutsche als pluriareale Sprache: Ein Beitrag gegen staatlich begrenzte Horizonte in der Diskussion um die deutsche Sprache in Österreich. Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German 29(2). 147–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidlin, Regula, Eva Wyss & Winifred Davies. 2017. Plurizentrik revisited — aktuelle Perspektiven auf die Variation der deutschen Standardsprache. In Winifred Davies, Annelies Häcki Buhofer, Regula Schmidlin, Melanie Wagner & Eva Wyss (eds.), Standardsprache. zwischen Norm und Praxis: Theoretische Betrachtungen, empirische Studien und sprachdidaktische Ausblicke, 8–20. Tübingen: Narrr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Britta. 2019. Methodological nationalism in linguistics. Language Sciences 76. 101169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Global diffusion, regional attraction, local roots? Sociocognitive perspectives on the pluricentricity of English. In Augusto S. d. Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel, Marianne Hundt & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.). 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Leen Impe & Dirk Geeraerts. 2014. Phonetic distance and intelligibility in Dutch. In Augusto S. d. Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L. 2021. Transnational dialect contact and language variation and change in World Englishes. In Alexander Onysko (ed.), Research Developments in World Englishes, 149–172. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseng, Amelia & Lars Hinrichs. 2020. Mobility and the English language. In Bas Aarts, April M. S. McMahon & Lars Hinrichs (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 2nd edn. 637–652. Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tupas, T. R. F. (ed.). 2015. Unequal Englishes: The politics of Englishes today. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergeiner, Philip C. Elisabeth Buchner, Eva Fuchs & Stephan Elspaß. 2021. Weil STANDARD verständlich ist und DIALEKT authentisch macht. In Toke Hoffmeister, Markus Hundt & Saskia Naths (eds.), Laien, Wissen, Sprache, 417–442. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, Norbert R. 1994. Österreichisches zum österreichischen Deutsch. Aus Anlaß des Erscheinens von: Wolfgang Pollak: Was halten die Österreicher von ihrem Deutsch? Eine sprachpolitische und soziosemiotische Analyse der sprachlichen Identität der Österreicher. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 61(1). 66–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yurchenko, Asya, Sven Leuckert & Claudia Lange. 2021. Comparing written Indian Englishes with the new Corpus of Regional Indian Newspaper Englishes (CORINNE). ICAME Journal 45(1). 179–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue