Cover not available

In:Variation in Second and Heritage Languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston and Xiaoshi Li
[Studies in Language Variation 28] 2022
► pp. 97–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
What can Cantonese heritage speakers tell us about age of acquisition, linguistic dominance, and sociophonetic variation?

ORCiD logo with link | Saint Catherine University
Published online: 14 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.28.05tse
Abstract
For many individuals, the first acquired language is also the linguistically dominant language, but what are the implications for sociophonetic variation if the linguistically dominant language is a second acquired childhood language, as is the case for many heritage speakers? This chapter addresses two correlates of linguistic dominance on the production of L2-influenced vowels in heritage Cantonese sociolinguistic interview data. Results show that Cantonese Production Score (CPS), an externally measured proficiency proxy, is consistently a better predictor than Ethnic Orientation (a self-reported identity metric) in accounting for speakers who are most likely to produce English influenced vowels. While a distinction between child vs. adult language acquisition remains important, these results highlight linguistic dominance as an interacting factor in sociophonetic variation.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Acquisition and the study of contact-induced sound change
    • Frameworks based on child vs. adult acquisition
    • A framework based on linguistic dominance
  • Background on Toronto heritage Cantonese
    • The social context
    • The Cantonese vowel system
    • Research question
  • Methodology
    • Data and analysis procedures
    • Ethnic orientation (EO) group
    • Cantonese production score (CPS)
  • Results
    • The vowel /y/
    • The vowel /u/
    • R2 for the fixed effects
    • Summary
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Bauer, Robert S. & Paul K. Benedict. 1997. Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer Program] (version 6.0.15). [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2016. Thematic household survey report No. 59. Hong Kong. [URL].
Chan, Arlene. 2011. The Chinese in Toronto from 1878: From outside to inside the circle. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coetsem, Frans van. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cui, Naomi, Minyi Zhu, Vina Law, Holman Tse & Naomi Nagy. 2014. Exploring automated formant analysis for comparative variationist study of heritage Cantonese and English. In Presentation at change and variation in Canada/Changement et Variation au Canada (CVC 8). Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.), 2020. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 23rd ed. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorman, Kyle, Jonathan Howell & Michael Wagner. 2011. Prosodylab-Aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech. Canadian Acoustics 39(3). 192–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F. & James A. Walker. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22(1). 37–67. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keefe, Susan Emley & Amado M. Padilla. 1987. Chicano ethnicity. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyskawa, Paulina, Ruth Maddeaux, Emilia Melara & Naomi Nagy. 2016. Heritage speakers follow all the rules: Language contact and convergence in Polish devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2). 219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2015. The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 2011. A multilingual corpus to explore variation in language contact situations. Rassegna Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata 43(1/2). 65–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Joanna Chociej & Michol F. Hoffman. 2014. Analyzing ethnic orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language & Communication 35. 9–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi & Miriam Meyerhoff. 2008. Introduction: Social lives in language. In Gillian Sankoff, Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy (Eds.), Social lives in language–Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff, 1–17. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, Arvilla Chapin. 1976. The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. University of Pennsylvania dissertation. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2013. Linguistic outcomes of bilingualism. In J. K Chambers & Natalie Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 501–518. Maldon, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scovel, Thomas. 2000. A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20. 213–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smits, Caroline. 1998. Two models for the study of language contact: A Psycho-linguistic perspective versus a socio-cultural perspective. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 377–390. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2017. Toronto, C [Census Subdivision], Ontario and Canada [Country] (Table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. [URL].
Thomas, Erik & Tyler Kendall. 2007. NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2013. Sociolinguistic typology social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsang, Chui-Lim. 1984. Sociolinguistic considerations in selecting the language of instruction in a bilingual programme. In Beverly Hong (ed.), New papers on Chinese language use, 45–58. Canberra: Contemporary China Centre, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, Holman. 2019. Vowel shifts in Cantonese? Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5(1). 67–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, James A. 2015. Canadian English: A sociolinguistic perspective. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2007. Some issues in the study of language contact. Journal of Language Contact 1(1). 22–40. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. On the unity of contact phenomena: The case for imposition. In Carole de Féral (ed.), In and out of Africa: Languages in question. In honour of Robert Nicolaï, 43–71. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The ecology of language and the New Englishes: Toward an integrative framework. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Anna Mauranen & Svetlana Vetchinnikova (eds.), Changing English: Global and local perspectives, 25–55. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1996. Lexicon optimization in languages without alternations. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 354–385. Salford, Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne Oi-kan. 1972. Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zee, Eric. 1999. Change and variation in the syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants in Hong Kong Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27(1). 120–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fernández Flórez, Carmen & Bret Linford
2025. Implicit bias and the L2 perception of the Peninsular Spanish interdental fricative /θ/. In Research at the Intersection of Second Language Acquisition and Sociolinguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 43], ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Li, Katrina Kechun, Li Nguyen, Christopher Bryant & Kayeon Yoo
2024. Lexical tonal effects in code-switching: A comparative study of Cantonese, Mandarin, and Vietnamese switching with English. International Journal of Bilingualism 28:5 ► pp. 799 ff. DOI logo
Tse, Holman
2024. Functional Load and Vowel Merger in Toronto Heritage Cantonese. In The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages, ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue