Cover not available

In:Variation in Second and Heritage Languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston and Xiaoshi Li
[Studies in Language Variation 28] 2022
► pp. 71–96

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
Cross-linguistic influence in the acquisition of L3 variation

A comparison of speech and writing

ORCiD logo with link | National University of Singapore
Published online: 14 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.28.04par
Abstract
This chapter addresses stylistic and obligatory variation in third language (L3) argument realization patterns. It focuses on the effects of formal second language (L2) learning experience, typological proximity, and five linguistic factors (discourse type, clause type, verb type, NP animacy, NP person). A corpus analysis of L3 Korean spoken production demonstrates that the considered linguistic and developmental factors do influence spoken L3 variation patterns to a certain extent. However, for the early bilingual participants, the analysis found a strong influence of their first languages (L1s) on their L3 spoken production, particularly in associating animacy with case. This L1 influence overrides the benefits of formal L2 learning experience and typological proximity on variation patterns in accusative argument realization, which were found in a prior study of L3 writing (Park & Starr 2019). The findings imply that it may take longer to acquire target-like sociolinguistic competence in L3 speech than in L3 writing.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Acquisition of a third language
  • The acquisition of Ln variation patterns
    • Variation in Korean argument realization
  • Research questions
  • The study
    • Participants
    • Data collection
    • Coding and analysis
  • Results: Linguistic factors
    • Type 2 variation
    • Type 1 variation
  • Results: Developmental factors
    • Type 2 variation
    • Type 1 variation
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Bardel, Camilla & Ylva Falk. 2007. The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research 23. 459–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 2007. Second language acquisition: A variationist perspective. In Robert Bayley & Ceil Lucas (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications, 133–144. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert & Dennis R. Preston. 2008. Variation and second language grammars. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1(2). 385–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert & Vera Regan, Vera. 2004. Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(3). 323–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen. 1988. Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology 24. 560–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, Jennifer & Jason Rothman. 2010. On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics 48. 275–296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenoz, Jasone. 2003. The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism 7(1). 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, Ylva, Christina Lindqvist & Camilla Bardel. 2015. The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2). 227–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne, Claire Foley & Inna Vinnitskaya. 2004. The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1. 3–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammarberg, Björn. 2001. Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production. In Jasone Cenoz, Britta Hufeisen & Ulrike Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 21–41. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulstijn, Jan H. & Elaine Marchena. 1989. Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3). 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaensch, Carol. 2009. L3 enhanced feature sensitivity as a result of higher proficiency in the L2. In Yan-kit Ingrid Leung (ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar, 115–143. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jessner, Ulrich. 2006. Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jia, Li & Robert Bayley. 2002. Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(2). 103–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Taeho. 2008. Subject and object markings in conversational Korean. Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Elaine C. 1995. Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference?. Language Learning 45(3). 419–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, Batia & Stig Eliasson. 1993. What causes avoidance in L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1). 35–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, Yan-kit Ingrid. 2005. L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8. 39–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Ping, Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney. 1993. Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 32(2). 169–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi. 2010. Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a second language. Language Learning 60. 366–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Variation of subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36. 39–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi, Xiaoqing Chen & Wen-Hsin Chen. 2012. Variation of subject pronominal expression in Mandarin Chinese. Sociolinguistic Studies 6. 91–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1987. Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics 8. 315–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Terry Nadasdi & Katherine Rehner. 2010. The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Katherine Rehner & Terry Nadasdi. 2004. The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8 (3). 408–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Mihi & Rebecca L. Starr. 2015. The role of formal L2 learning experience in L3 acquisition among early bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism 13. 294–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regan, Vera. 1995. The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In Barbara F. Freed (ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, 245–268. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In Robert Bayley & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, 177–202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regan, Vera, Martin Howard & Isabelle Lemée. 2009. The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman Jason. 2011. L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research 27(1). 107–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, Jason. 2015. Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2). 179–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanz, Cristina. 2000. Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics 21(1). 23–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, Roumyana. 2017. The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(6). 651–665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L. 2017. Sociolinguistic variation and acquisition in two-way language immersion: Negotiating the standard. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Jacqueline. 1988. The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9(3). 235–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Qi, Diane Lillo-Martin, Catherine T. Best & Andrea Levitt. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2(3). 221–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2019. Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research. 37(3). 379–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit, Natalia Mitrofanova, Roksolana Mykhaylyk & Yulia Rodina. 2017. Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(6). 666–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ng, Tien Yi & Byeonggon Min
2025. Factors affecting L3 acquisition: effects of perceived language distance and metalinguistic awareness on L3 Korean among Hong Kong learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 28:6 ► pp. 662 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue