In:Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Acquisition across the Lifespan
Edited by Anna Ghimenton, Aurélie Nardy and Jean-Pierre Chevrot
[Studies in Language Variation 26] 2021
► pp. 227–250
Chapter 10Usage, evaluation and awareness of French sociolinguistic
variables by second-language learners during a stay abroad
The case of negative ne and optional liaison
Published online: 16 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.26.10gau
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.26.10gau
Abstract
This chapter deals with the acquisition of two
sociolinguistic variables of twenty-nine American and Chinese
learners of French. The purpose is to track the production and
evaluation of the optional liaison and the variable deletion of
negative ne during a 9-month stay abroad (SA) and
to take a close look at the differences between the two
sociolinguistic variables during the course of acquisition. We also
aim to understand whether evaluation and awareness of the usage of
these variables could influence the learners’ production.
Statistical analyses show that the use of formal variants by the
learners declined significantly during their SA. Moreover,
acquisition of the ne variable seems guided by
awareness of its sociolinguistic value, whereas acquisition of
optional liaison appears to be driven by exposure to input and
item-based learning.
Article outline
- 1.Sociolinguistic variation in second language research
- 2.Sociolinguistic variables in second language classroom and textbooks
- 3.Awareness and evaluation of sociolinguistic variants
- 4.Purpose of the study
- 5.Methodology
- a.Participants
- b.Sociolinguistic variables
- Optional liaison
- Negative ne
- c.Sociolinguistic interviews
- d.Judgement tasks for the two variables
- e.Questionnaire on sociolinguistic variables
- 6.Results
- a.Optional liaison
- b.Negative ne
- c.Evolution of judgements from T1 to T3
- 7.Conclusion and discussion
Notes Bibliography Appendix
References (37)
Adda-Decker, M., Boula de Mareüil, P. and Lamel, L. 1999 Pronunciation
variants French : schwa and
liaison. Proceedings of the
XIVth International Congress of Phonetics
Sciences, 2239–2242.
Adda-Decker, M., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C. & Lamel, L. 2012 La
liaison dans la parole spontanée familière : une étude sur
grand corpus. Revue Française
de Linguistique
Appliquée, 17, (1), 113–128.
Ashby, W. 2001 Un
nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en
français parlé tourangeau : s’agit-il d’un changement en
cours ? Journal of French
Language
Studies, 11, 1–22.
Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. 2000 Studying
the mind in the middle : a pratical guide to priming and
automacity
research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook
of research methods in social
psychology (pp. 253–285). New-York: Cambridge University Press.
Coveney, A. 1996 Variability
in spoken French. A sociolinguistic study of Interrogation
and
negation. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
De Jong, D. 1991 La
liaison à Orléans (France) et à Montréal
(Québec). Actes du XIIe
Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques
(pp. 198–201). Aix-en Provence, France.
Dewaele, J-M. 2002 Using
socio-stylistic variants in advanced French interlanguage:
the case of
‘nous’/‘on’. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, T. Ruthenberg & M. L. Poschen (Eds.) Eurosla
Yearbook (pp. 205–226). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dickerson, L. J. 1975 The
learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable
rules. TESOL
Quartely, 9, 401–7.
Durand, J. & Lyche, C. 2003 Le
projet ‘Phonologie du Français Contemporain’ (PFC) et sa
méthodologie. In E. Delais and J. Durand (Eds.), Corpus
et variation en phonologie du français : méthodes et
analyses (pp. 212–276). Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
2008 French
liaison in the light of corpus
data. Journal of French
Language
Studies. 18, (1), 33–66.
Durand, J., Laks, B. & Lyche, C. 2005 Un
corpus numérisé pour la phonologie du
français. In G. Williams (Ed.), La
linguistique de
corpus (pp. 205–217). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Durand, J., Laks, B., Calderone, B. & Tchobanov, A. 2011. Que
savons-nous de la liaison
aujourd’hui ? Langue
Française, 169, 103–135.
Ellis, N. C. 2002 Frequency
effects in language processing : a review with implications
for theories of implicit and explicit language
acquisition. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 24, (2), 143–188.
Etienne, C., & K. Sax. 2009 Stylistic
variation in French: bridging the gap between research and
textbooks. Modern Language
Journal, 93, 584–606.
Hansen, B. M. & Malderez, I. 2004 Le
ne de négation en région parisienne : une étude en temps
réel. Langage et
Société, 107, (1), 5–30.
Harnois-Delpiano, M. 2016 Le
kaléidoscope de la liaison en français : étude comparée de
son appropriation par des apprenants adultes de FLE et des
enfants natifs. Doctoral
dissertation. Grenoble Alpes University.
Howard, M. 2012 The
advanced learner’s sociolinguistic profile: On issues of
individual differences, second language exposure conditions,
and type of sociolinguistic
variable. The Modern Language
Journal, 96,(1), 20–33.
Howard, M., Mougeon, R. & Dewaele, J. M. 2013 Sociolinguistics
and second language
acquisition. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron & C. Lucas (Eds.) The
Oxford Handbook of
Sociolinguistics (pp. 340–359). New York, U.S.: Oxford University Press.
Kinginger, C. 2008 Language
learning in study abroad : Case studies of Americans in
France. Supplement to Modern
Language
Journal, 92, 1–124.
MacWhinney, B. 2000 The
CHILDES Project : Tools for Analyzing
Talk. 3rd
Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mallet, G. M. 2008 La
liaison en français : descriptions et analyses dans le
corpus PFC. Doctoral
dissertation, Paris 10 University.
Mougeon, R. & Dewaele, J.-M. 2002 L’acquisition
de la variation par les apprenants du français langue
seconde. Special issue of
Acquisition et Interaction en Langue
Etrangère, 17, 3–5.
Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T., & Rehner, K. 2002 Etat
de la recherche sur l’appropriation de la variation par les
apprenants avancés du FL2 ou
FLE. In J.-M. Dewaele & R. Mougeon (Eds.), L’acquisition
de la variation par les apprenants du français langue
seconde. Special Issue Acquisition
et Interaction en Langue
Etrangère, 17, 7–50.
Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. & Rehner, K. 2003 Emploi
du ‘futur’ dans le français parlé d’élèves
d’immersion. Journal of
French Language
Studies 13, (2), 195–219.
Nardy, A. 2008 Acquisition
des variables sociolingusitiques entre 2 et 6 ans : facteurs
sociologiques et influences des interactions au sein du
réseau social. Doctoral
dissertation, Stendhal, Grenoble University.
Regan, V., Howard, M. & Lemée, I. 2009 The
acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad
context. Bristol, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Sax, K. 2003 Acquisition
of stylistic variation in American learners of
French. Doctoral
dissertation, Bloomington, Indiana University.
Thomas, A. 2004 Phonetic
norm versus usage in advanced French as a second
Language. International
Review of Applied
Linguistics, 42, (4), 365–382.
Torreira, F., Adda-Decker, M. et Ernestus, M. 2010 The
Nijmegen corpus of casual
French. Speech
Communication, 52, 201–212.
van Compernolle, R. A. 2013 Concept
appropriation and the emergence of L2 sociostylistic
variation. Language Teaching
Research, 17, (3), 343–362.
van Compernolle, R. A. & Williams, L. 2011 Metalinguistic
explanations and self-reports as triangulation data for
interpreting second language sociolinguistic
performance. International
Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 21, (1), 26–50.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rosseel, Laura & Eline Zenner
2025. Introduction: Variation in language acquisition. In Variation in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 34], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
