Cover not available

In:Language Variation – European Perspectives VIII: Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 10), Leeuwarden, June 2019
Edited by Hans Van de Velde, Nanna Haug Hilton and Remco Knooihuizen
[Studies in Language Variation 25] 2021
► pp. 135–160

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 6
Exploring an approach for modelling lectal coherence

ORCiD logo with link | Queen Mary University of London | Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.25.06bea
Abstract
This paper presents an exploratory approach for modelling and measuring the concept of lectal coherence – the logical unity of idiolects, dialects, sociolects, regiolects, etc. – and how coherence can shape variation and foster or constrain language change. Twelve phonological and morpho-syntactic features of Central Swabian, a variety of German spoken in the southwestern part of the country, exemplify differences in lectal coherence across two communities (Stuttgart and Schwäbisch Gmünd) and two points in time (1982 and 2017). Following the traditional quantitative variationist approach pioneered by Labov (1963), coupled with Guttman-like (1944) implicational scaling, and drawing on concepts from the order and lattice theory of mathematics (Partee, Ter Meulen, and Wall 1993), the proposed model brings together three views of coherence – covariation, implicational scaling, and lattice theory – to demonstrate a holistic approach to the study of linguistic coherence and its influence on language change. The research question this investigation explores is: does lectal coherence enable or inhibit linguistic change? The hypothesis tested in this study is that more coherent lects are less vulnerable to change and convergence while less coherent lects are more susceptible.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
    • 2.1Speech communities
    • 2.2Swabian corpus
    • 2.3Linguistic variables
    • 2.4Extra-linguistic predictors
  • 3.Analysis and results
    • 3.1Linguistic variables
    • 3.2Dialect change in Swabia
    • 3.3Lectal coherence
      • Lattices
      • Pairwise comparisons
      • The Lectal Lattice
      • PCA and the Lattice
      • Implicational coherence
      • Coherence and language change
      • Limitations and future opportunities
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Ammon, Ulrich. 1973. Dialekt und Einheitssprache in ihrer sozialen Verflechtung: Eine empirische Untersuchung zu einem vernachlässigten Aspekt von Sprache und sozialer Ungleichheit. (Beltz-Monographie, Pragmalinguistik 3). Weinheim & Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1997. Co-occurrence restrictions between linguistic variables: A case for social dialectology, phonological theory and variation studies. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, change, and phonological theory, 69–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, 7–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Frans Hinskens. 2005. The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Karen V. Beaman & Michael Ramscar. Forthcoming 2021. Deconfounding the effects of competition and attrition on dialect across the lifespan: A panel study investigation. In Karen V. Beaman & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Language variation and language change across the lifespan: Theoretical and empirical perspectives from panel studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaman, Karen V. 2020. Coherence in real- and apparent-time: A sociolinguistic study of Swabian. Queen Mary University of London: Unpublished PhD Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Identity and mobility in linguistic change across the lifespan: The case of Swabian German. In Arne Ziegler, Stefanie Edler, Nina Kleczkowski & Georg Oberdorfe (eds.), Urban matters: Current approaches of international sociolinguistic research (Studies in Language Variation). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaman, Karen V. & Fabian Tomaschek. 2021. Loss of historical phonetic contrast across the lifespan: Articulatory, lexical, and social effects on sound change in Swabian. In Karen V. Beaman & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Language variation and language change across the lifespan: Theoretical and empirical perspectives from panel studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1973. The nature of a creole continuum. Language 49(3). 640–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2010. Supralocal regional dialect levelling. In Carmen Llamas & Dominic Watt (eds.), Language and identities, 193–204. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia & Guy Bailey. 2017. The effect of small Ns and gaps in contact on panel survey data. In Suzanne Evans Wagner & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Panel studies of variation and change, 181–212. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1968. Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 349–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1970. Two models of socially significant linguistic variation. Language 46(3). 551–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie & Jacques Van Keymeulen. 2016. Implicational scales in colloquial Belgian Dutch. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 24. 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guttman, Louis. 1944. A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review 9(2). 139–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. & Frans Hinskens. 2016. Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities. Lingua 172–173. 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans. 2020. Surviving Limburg and Hollandic dialect features and what they have in common. In Massimo Cerruti & Stavroula Tsiplakou (eds.), Intermediate language varieties: Koinai and regional standards in Europe, 55–77. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Peter Auer & Paul Kerswill. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 1–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Walt Wolfram. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(4). 427–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holm, Sture. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6(2). 65–70. [URL]
Horvath, Barbara M. & David Sankoff. 1987. Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16(2). 179–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19(3). 273–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. 1987. Variabilität zwischen Dialekt und Standardsprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistik 8(5). 544–558.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Steffen Klaere. 2017. A case for clustering speakers and linguistic variables: Big issues with smaller samples in language variation. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives VI (Studies in Language Variation VI), 23–46. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 339–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks. 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Alice G. ter Meulen & Robert E. Wall. 1993. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 2001. Implicational scales. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 142–167. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred Lehmann & Yakou Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn & John Nerbonne. 2011. Bipartite spectral graph partitioning for clustering dialect varieties and detecting their linguistic features. Computer Speech and Language 25(3). 700–715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06), 1556–1559. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue