Cover not available

In:Language Variation - European Perspectives VII: Selected papers from the Ninth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 9), Malaga, June 2017
Edited by Juan-Andrés Villena-Ponsoda, Francisco Díaz Montesinos, Antonio Manuel Ávila-Muñoz and Matilde Vida-Castro
[Studies in Language Variation 22] 2019
► pp. 119–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
ASPA Tools or how to measure foreign-accentedness and intelligibility in an objective manner

 | Universidad Rey Juan Carlos I, Spain
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.22.07jur
Abstract
Dialectometry has traditionally been examined from the perspective of the dialects and accents of a single language or related languages. However, foreign accents still remain understudied within this paradigm (see section 2 and Wieling et al. 2014 for an exception).
In this chapter we present ASPA Tools (Accented-Speech Phonetic Alignment), a web application which measures phonetic distances between foreign-accented speech and a standard pronunciation. Unlike similar instruments (Visual DialectoMetry or Gabmap), ASPA Tools measures the degree of intelligibility of non-native English speech in relation to English as a Lingua Franca (ELF).
We use Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) and two variations of the Levenshtein Distance (LD) to examine the pronunciation of a group of speakers and compare it to a given ELF standard. Furthermore, ASPA Tools objectively measures the prototypical pronunciation of the group, which allows researchers to analyse the most salient deviations from the ELF standard.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Existent dialectometric tools
  • 3.English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) and the Lingua Franca Core (LFC)
  • 4.Prototype Theory applied to (foreign) accents
  • 5.Technical characteristics of ASPA Tools
    • 5.1Input/Output data
    • 5.2Algorithms
  • 6.Conclusions and future perspectives
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Alonso, Laura, Irene Castellon, Jordi Escribano, Xavier Messeguer, and Lluis Padro. 2004. “Multiple Sequence Alignment for Characterizing the Linear Structure of Revision.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: 403–6. Lisbon (Portugal). Retrieved from: [URL] [Accessed 16/08/2018]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, Gotzon, Gotzon Santander, Iker Usobiaga, and Aitor Iglesias. 2016. “Diatech: Tool for Making Dialectometry Easier.” Dialectologia: Revista Electrònica 17: 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beijering, Karin, Charlotte Gooskens, and Wilbert Heeringa. 2008. “Predicting Intelligibility and Perceived Linguistic Distances by Means of the Levenshtein Algorithm.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 15: 13–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloem, Jelke, Anna Mészáros, Martijn Benjamin Wieling, and John Nerbonne. 2016. “Automatically Identifying Characteristic Features of Non-Native English Accents.” In The Future of Dialects, ed. by Marie-Hélène Côté,, Remco Knooihuizen, and John Nerbonne, 155–173. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1989. Prospects and Problems of Prototype Theory. Linguistics 27 (4): 587–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, and Wilbert Heeringa. 2004. “Perceptive Evaluation of Levenshtein Dialect Distance Measurements Using Norwegian Dialect Data.” Language Variation and Change 16 (03): 189–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, Wilbert Heeringa, and Karin Beijering. 2008. “Phonetic and Lexical Predictors of Intelligibility.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2 (1–2): 63–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haimerl, Edgar. 2006. “Database Design and Technical Solutions for the Management, Calculation, and Visualization of Dialect Mass Data.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 21 (4): 437–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert, Peter Kleiweg, Charlotte Gooskens, and John Nerbonne. 2006. “Evaluation of String Distance Algorithms for Dialectology.” LD´06 Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Distances: 51–62. Sydney (Australia): Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from: [URL] [Accessed 26/07/2018] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurado-Bravo, Maria Angeles. 2018. The Intelligibility of Spanish Regional Accents in L2 English after Tailored Lingua Franca Core Instruction: a Critical Empirical Analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Faculty of Philology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte. 2003. “How to Do Things with Allophones. Linguistic Stereotypes as Cognitive Reference Points in Social Cognition”. In Cognitive Models and Thought. Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings, ed. by René Dirven and Roslyn M. Frank, 69–120. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Usage-Based Cognitive Phonology”. International Journal of English Studies 6 (2): 107–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Style-Shifting and Shifting Styles: A Socio-Cognitive Approach to Lectal Variation”. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven, 45–88. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Lectal Acquisition and Linguistic Stereotype Formation”. In Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen and Yves Peirsman, 225–263. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leinonen, Therese, Çağrı Çöltekin, and John Nerbonne. 2016. “Using Gabmap.” Lingua, Linguistic Research in the CLARIN Infrastructure: 178: 71–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, John M. 2005. “Changing Contexts and Shifting Paradigms in Pronunciation Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 39 (3): 369–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John, Rinke Colen, Charlotte Gooskens, Peter Kleiweg, and Therese Leinonen. 2011. “Gabmap - a Web Application for Dialectology.” Dialectologia: Revista Electrònica: 65–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John, and Wilbert Heeringa. 2001. “Computational Comparison and Classification of Dialects.” Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 9: 69–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John, and Peter Kleiweg. 2003. “Lexical Distance in LAMSAS.” Computers and the Humanities 37 (3): 339–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilus, Zahariah. 2013. “Exploring ESL Learners’ Attitudes Towards English Accents.” World Applied Sciences Journal 21: 143–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prokić, Jelena, Martijn Benjamin Wieling, and John Nerbonne. 2009. “Multiple Sequence Alignments in Linguistics.” Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Language Technology and Resources for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, 18–25.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. “Natural Categories”. Cognitive Psychology 4 (3): 328–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975a. “Cognitive Reference Points”. Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 532–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975b. “Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 104 (3): 192–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scales, Julie, Ann Wennerstrom, Dara Richard, and Su Hui Wu. 2006. “Language Learners’ Perceptions of Accent.” Tesol Quarterly 40 (4): 715–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Larry E., and Cecil L. Nelson. 1985. “International Intelligibility of English: Directions and Resources.” World Englishes 4 (3): 333–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorisation: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Robin. 2010. Teaching the Pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberger, Steven. 2015. Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from [URL] [Accessed 10/08/2018]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn Benjamin. 2012. A Quantitative Approach to Social and Geographical Dialect Variation. University Library Groningen: Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn Benjamin, Jelke Bloem, Kaitlin Mignella, Mona Timmermeister, and John Nerbonne. 2014. “Measuring Foreign Accent Strength in English. Validating Levenshtein Distance as a Measure.” The Mind Research Repository (Beta) 0 (1):1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue