Cover not available

In:Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English
Edited by Sandra Jansen and Lucia Siebers
[Studies in Language Variation 21] 2019
► pp. 183–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
The modal auxiliary verb may and change in Irish English

Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.21.10kir
This paper presents an analysis of the modal auxiliary verb may using data from the International Corpus of English: Ireland Component (the ICE-Ireland Corpus and from other corpora for comparison. The analysis is focused on the semantic functions of may, especially root and epistemic uses. The analysis shows that root uses of may predominate overall but epistemic uses predominate in spoken data, in both parts of Ireland. It uncovers a further instance of mild obligation may, which may be considered an Irishism.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research questions
    • 2.1Corpus data
    • 2.2ICE-Ireland
    • 2.3ICE-GB
    • 2.4London-Lund Corpus of Spoken British English (LLC)
    • 2.5Corpus of Irish English Correspondence (CORIECOR)
    • 2.6Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus (LOB)
    • 2.7Freiburg Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus (FLOB)
    • 2.8The British National Corpus (BNC)
  • 3.Background
    • 3.1Modal verb system of Irish
    • 3.2Development of may in the History of English
    • 3.3Descriptive model of may
  • 4.May in nineteenth-century Ireland
    • 4.1May in late twentieth-century Irish and British English
    • 4.2Irish uses of may
    • 4.3Merger/blend/borderline cases
    • 4.4May and prosody
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Bowie, Jill, Sean Wallis & Bas Aarts. 2013. Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: mapping the impact of 'genre'. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, 57–94. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 145–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter C. 2007. Can/could and may/might in British, American and Australian English: A corpus-based account. World Englishes 26 (4). 474–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P. 2010. Irish English: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony. 2012. English in Ireland: A complex case study. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott, (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 470–480. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. Historical English syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse. 2010. Some observations on the meaning of modals’. In Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wads (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar offered to Renaat Declerck, 72–91. Tokyo: Kaitakusha Co. Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Susan Reed. 2006. Mood and modality in English. In Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 269–290. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere Ilse & Susan Reed. 2011. Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics 15(1). 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta. 2003. Pragmatic and sociological constraints on the functions of may in contemporary British English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug &Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 301–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1982. On the development of the modals and of epistemic function in English. In Anders Ahlqvist (ed.), Papers from the 5 th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , 74–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. (ed.) 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The international corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2007. Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Modal verbs in English and Irish. In Esa Penttilä & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Language contacts meets English dialects: Studies in honour of Markku Filppula, 259–274. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. The verb. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 213–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2013. Irish English: The Republic of Ireland . Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. & John M. Kirk. 2008. ICE-Ireland: A user’s guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. SPICE-Ireland: A user’s guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. & Jeffrey L. Kallen. 2007. Assessing Celticity in a corpus of Irish Standard English. In Hildegard L. C. Tristram (ed.), The Celtic Languages in contact, 270–288. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Negation in Irish Standard English comparative perspectives. In Esa Penttilä & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Language contacts meet English dialects: Studies in honour of Markku Filppula, 277–296. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. How Scottish is Irish Standard English? In Robert McColl Millar (ed.), Northern lights,northern words: Selected papers from the FRLSU conference, Kirkwall 2009, 178–213. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, John M., Jeffrey L. Kallen, Jeffrey, Orla Lowry, Anne Rooney & Margaret Mannion. 2011a. International corpus of English: Ireland component. The ICE-Ireland corpus: Version 1.2.2. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast and Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. The SPICE-Ireland corpus: Systems of pragmatic annotation for the spoken component of ICE-Ireland. Version 1.2.2. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast and Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisbye, Torben. 1972. An historical outline of English syntax. Volume 2. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1991. Can (could) vs. may (might): Regional variation in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 233–290. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. Third Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech Geoffrey & Jennifer Coates. 1980. Semantic indeterminacy and the modals. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech &Jan Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 79–90. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith (eds). 2009. Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin & Carolina P. Amador-Moreno. 2012a. A corpus of Irish English correspondence (CORIECOR): A tool for studying the history and evolution of Irish English. In Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds.), New perspectives on Irish English, 265–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Geoffrey Leech. 2006. Current changes in English syntax. In Bas Aarts & April MacMahon (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin & Carolina P. Amador-Moreno. 2012b. ‘I will be expecting a letter from you before this reaches you’: A corpus-based study of shall/will variation in Irish English correspondence. In Marina Dossena & Gabriela Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuillan, Peter. 2009. Modals in Irish. In Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds.), Modals in the languages of Europe: A reference work, 71–105. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Bas Aarts. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolas, Marion. 2014. Modal verbs in Irish English. MA thesis: University of Lille 3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan (ed.). 1990. The London-Lund Corpus of spoken English: Description and research. Lund Studies in English, 82. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan & Quirk, Randloph1980. A corpus of conversational English. Lund Studies in English, 56. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Andreas Ammann. 2008. Overlap between Situational and Epistemic Modal Marking. In Martin Haspelmath, Mathew S. Dryer, David Gil &Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hattum, Marije. 2012. Irish English modal verbs from the fourteenth to the twentieth centuries. PhD thesis: University of Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Wright, Georg H. 1951. An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

O’Keeffe, Anne
2023. Irish English Corpus Linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Irish English, ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue