In:Language Variation - European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015
Edited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar
[Studies in Language Variation 19] 2017
► pp. 3–22
Analytic and synthetic
Typological change in varieties of European languages
Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.01has
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.01has
Abstract
It has long been observed that the modern European languages use more function words compared to earlier inflectional patterns, and this trend seems to have increased even further in creoles and other non-standard varieties. Here we make two arguments: First, we note that the terms synthetic and analytic are based on the “word” concept, which is not well-defined, so that these concepts cannot be used in a synchronic typology. But we can define a notion of “analyticization”, i.e. the replacement of an earlier pattern by a new, more elaborate pattern based on lexical or concrete items. Second, we observe that such analyticizations are particularly common in creole languages (when viewed as continuations of their lexifiers), and we hypothesize that this is due to the extra transparency that is required in situations with many adult second-language speakers.
Keywords: analytic, synthetic, function word, grammaticalization, creole
Article outline
- 1.The macro-comparative perspective: Language typology and language contact
- 2.A short history of the analytic/synthetic terminology
- 3.Analytic/synthetic as a synchronic notion
- 4.Synthetic/analytic in diachrony
- 5.Analyticizations occur very commonly in creoles
- 5.1Definite articles (APiCS 28, 9)
- 5.2Indefinite articles (APiCS 29, 10)
- 5.3Plural markers (APiCS 22, 23)
- 5.4Genitive markers (APiCS 38, 37)
- 5.5Personal pronouns in subject or possessor function (APiCS 62)
- 5.6Accusative markers (APiCS 57)
- 5.7Dative markers (APiCS 60, 61)
- 5.8Future tense markers (cf. APiCS 48)
- 5.9Past tense (or anterior) markers (APiCS 45)
- 5.10Imperfective aspect markers (APiCS 46, 47, 48)
- 5.11Causative construction
- 6.Analyticization is generally favoured by language-contact situations
- 7.Further examples of increased analyticity in European varieties
- 7.1Increased analyticity in Afrikaans
- 7.2Increased analyticity in Brazilian Portuguese
- 7.3Increased analyticity in Bulgarian
- 8.Conclusion
Notes References
References (51)
Ansaldo, Umberto, Stephen Matthews and Lisa Lim (eds.). 2007. Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Atoyebi, Joseph Dele. 2010. A Reference Grammar of Oko: A West Benue-Congo Language of North-Central Nigeria. Köln: Köppe.
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag. 2011. “Creoles Are Typologically Distinct from Non-Creoles.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1). 5–42. .
Bruyn, Adrienne. 2009. “Grammaticalization in Creoles: Ordinary and Not-So-Ordinary Cases.” Studies in Language 33(2). 312–337.
Bybee, Joan. 2006. “Language Change and Universals.” In Linguistic Universals, ed. by Ricardo Mairal and Juana Gil, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlier, Anne, Walter De Mulder and Béatrice Lamiroy. 2012. “Introduction: The Pace of Grammaticalization in a Typological Perspective.” Folia Linguistica 46(2). 287–301.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2012. “Cognitive Explanations, Distributional Evidence, and Diachrony.” Studies in Language 36(3). 645–670. .
Good, Jeff. 2012. “Typologizing Grammatical Complexities, or: Why Creoles May Be Paradigmatically Simple but Syntagmatically Average.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1). 1–47.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. “A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language.” International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3). 178–194.
. 2004. “On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization.” In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2010. “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86(3). 663–687.
. 2011. “The Indeterminacy of Word Segmentation and the Nature of Morphology and Syntax.” Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80.
. 2017. “Revisiting the Anasynthetic Spiral.” In Grammaticalization and Language Typology, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog. (to appear)
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hinrichs, Uwe. 2004. “Ist das Bulgarische kreolisiertes Altbulgarisch?” In Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Wege zum analytischen Sprachtyp, ed. by Uwe Hinrichs, 231–242. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Holm, John. 2004. Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kortmann, Bernd and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2011. “Parameters of Morphosyntactic Variation in World Englishes: Prospects and Limitations of Searching for Universals.” In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, ed. by Peter Siemund, 264–290. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Lahiri, Aditi 2000. “Hierarchical Restructuring in the Creation of Verbal Morphology in Bengali and Germanic: Evidence from Phonology.” In Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology, ed. by Aditi Lahiri, 71–123. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change.” Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–318.
Leufkens, Sterre. 2013. “The Transparency of Creoles.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28(2). 323–362.
Lupyan, G. and R. Dale. 2010. “Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure.” PLoS ONE 5(1). e8559.
Matthews, P. H. 1997. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McWhorter, John H. 2001. “The Worlds Simplest Grammars Are Creole Grammars.” Linguistic Typology 5(2–3). 125–166.
2007. Language Interrupted: Signs of Non-Native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Michaelis, Susanne. 2015. “Inflectional Complexity in Creole Languages: Evidence from the Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures.” Paper presented at the SLE conference in Leiden, September 2015.
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber (eds.). 2013. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (apics-inline.info)
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. “The Simplicity of Creoles in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, ed. by Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson, 265–285. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Plag, Ingo. 2002. “On the Role of Grammaticalization in Creolization.” In Pidgin and Creole Linguistics in the 21st Century, ed. by Glenn Gilbert. New York: Peter Lang.
Reinöhl, Uta and Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2017. “ “Renewal”: A Figure of Speech or a Process Sui Generis?” Manuscript, University of Cologne.
Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel and Kristine A. Hildebrandt. 2010. “The Prosodic Word Is Not Universal, but Emergent.” Journal of Linguistics 46(3). 657–709.
Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie grecque-latine-allemande.
Schleicher, August. 1860. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.
Seuren, Pieter and Herman Wekker. 1986. “Semantic Transparency as a Factor in Creole Genesis.” In Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis, ed. by Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith, 57–70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Siegel, Jeff, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi and Bernd Kortmann. 2014. “Measuring Analyticity and Syntheticity in Creoles.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1). 49–85.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2009. “Typological Parameters of Intralingual Variability: Grammatical Analyticity Versus Syntheticity in Varieties of English.” Language Variation and Change 21(03). 319–353.
. 2016. “An analytic-synthetic spiral in the history of English.” In Cyclical Change Continued, ed. by Elly van Gelderen, 93–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Thomason, Sarah Grey and Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cited by (48)
Cited by 48 other publications
Blasi, Damian, Felicia Bisnath & Pui Yiu Szeto
Olguín Martínez, Jesus
Bülow, Lars & Philip C. Vergeiner
De Knop, Sabine
Pastor, Dorian, Agnes Korn & Christian Rammer
Sung, Hakyung, Sooyeon Cho & Kristopher Kyle
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina & Cristhian Tomàs-Vidal
Van Olmen, Daniel
Corizzo, Roberto & Sebastian Leal-Arenas
Uglev, Viktor & Oleg Sychev
Zhou, Chenliang & Haitao Liu
De Smet, Isabeau, Laura Rosseel & Freek Van de Velde
Karaj, David M.
Kuzmina, A.A., M.A. Lifshits & V.Y. Kostenko
Vercher García, Enrique Javier & Manuel Bullejos Lorenzo
Danylenko, Andrii
2020. On the grammaticalization of the -(v)ši- resultative in North Slavic. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 293 ff.
Marukatat, Rangsipan
Smith, John Charles
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Laura Rosseel
Tak, Jin-young
Tantucci, Vittorio & Matteo Di Cristofaro
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
Coupe, Alexander R.
Dahl, Östen
Esseesy, Mohssen
Haig, Geoffrey
Haspelmath, Martin
Heine, Bernd
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
Klamer, Marian
McWhorter, John H.
Mithun, Marianne
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
Mushin, Ilana
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
Smith, Hiram L.
Zariquiey, Roberto
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath
Inglese, Guglielmo
2017. A synchronic and diachronic typology of Hittite reciprocal constructions. Studies in Language 41:4 ► pp. 956 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
