In:Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change
Edited by Janne Bondi Johannessen † and Joseph C. Salmons
[Studies in Language Variation 18] 2015
► pp. 135–160
Get fulltext
Functional Convergence and Extension in Contact
Syntactic and Semantic Attributes of the Progressive Aspect in Pennsylvania Dutch
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 20 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.06bro
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.06bro
This paper investigates the extension of the progressive aspect in contemporary Pennsylvania Dutch. The scope of convergence in contact varieties is a debated subject in theoretical linguistics; the most recent and promising research finds that convergence in contact is not a simple one-to-one mapping, nor an opportunity for any structural anomaly to present. Previous studies concluded that Pennsylvania Dutch had matched and gone beyond English semantic constraints for the progressive aspect. The extent of the progressive in Pennsylvania Dutch has not been systematically documented. To account for these findings, we propose, as most recently suggested by Putnam and Sánchez (2013), an analysis of feature reconfiguration, with the result of progressive aspect appearing with different aspectual classes of verbs (most notably, with certain types of statives).
Keywords: aspect, convergence, feature reconfiguration, hyperextension, Pennsylvania Dutch, semantics, syntax
References (56)
Andersson, Sven-Gunnar. 1989. “On the Generalization of Progressive Constructions: ‘Ich bin (das Buch) am Lesen’ – Status and Usage in Three Varieties in German.” In Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Aspectology, ed. by Lars-Gunnar Larsson, 95–106. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Bartsch, Renate. 1995. Situations, Tense and Aspect: Dynamic Discourse Ontology and the Semantic Flexibility of Temporal System in German and English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Behrens, Bergliot, Monique Flecken and Mary Carroll. 2013. “Progressive Attraction: On the Use and Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Dutch, Norwegian, and German.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25(2): 95–136.
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology After Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Brown, Joshua R. 2011. Religious Identity and Language Shift Among Amish-Mennonites in Kishacoquillas Valley, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University dissertation.
Burridge, Kate. 1992. “Creating Grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario.” In Diachronic Studies on the Languages of the Anabaptists, ed. by Kate Burridge and Werner Enninger, 199–241. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts-Amherst dissertation.
Dowty, David. 1979/1991. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fábregas, Antonio and Michael Putnam. 2013. “Parasitic Semantics (or Why Swedish Can’t Lexicalize Middle Voice Constructions).” Proceedings of the Penn Linguistics Colloquium 36 19(1): 51–58.
. 2014. “The Emergence of Middle Voice Structures With and Without Agents.” The Linguistic Review 31(2): 193–240.
Fuller, Janet. 1996. “When Cultural Maintenance Means Linguistic Convergence: Pennsylvania German Evidence for the Matrix Language Turnover Hypothesis.” Language in Society 25: 493–514.
Gachelin, Jean-Marc. 1997. “The Progressive and Habitual Aspects in Non-Standard Englishes.” In Englishes Around the World: Studies in Honour of Manfred Gorlach, vol. 1, ed. by Edgar W. Schneider, 33–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hale, Ken and Jay Keyser. 2005. “Aspect and the Syntax of Argument Structure.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapport, 11–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howell, Robert. 1993. “German Immigration and the Development of Regional Variants of American English: Using Contact Theory to Discover our Roots.” In The German Language in America, ed. by Joseph Salmons, 190–212. Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute.
Huffines, M. Lois. 1986. “The Function of Aspect in Pennsylvania German and the Impact of English.” Yearbook for German – American Studies 21: 137–154.
Kim, Jaegwon. 1969. “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations.” In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, ed. by Nicholas Rescher, 198–215. Dordrecht: Reidel.
. 1976. “Events as Property Exemplifications.” In Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, ed. by Myles Brand and Douglas Walton, 159–177. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Louden, Mark. 1988. Bilingualism and Syntactic Change in Pennsylvania German. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.
. 2005. “On the Limits of the Davidsonian Approach: The Case of Copula Sentences.” Theoretical Linguistics 31(3): 275–313.
Maurer, Philippe. 1997. “Tense-Aspect-Mood in Principense.” In The structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles: Including Selected Papers from the Meetings of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, ed. by Arthur K. Spears and Donald Winford, 415–435. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Montrul, Silvina. 2002. “Incomplete Acquisition and Attrition of Spanish Tense/Aspect Distinctions in Adult Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5: 39–68.
. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. “Incomplete Acquisition of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish Heritage Speakers.” International Journal of Bilingualism 13(3): 239–269.
Polinsky, Maria. 1997. “American Russian: Language Loss Meets Language Acquisition.” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic 19 Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting (1995), ed. by Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornsich, Natasha Kondrashova and Draga Zec, 370–406. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers.
. 2008. “Without Aspect.” In Case and Grammatical Relations, ed. by Greville G. Corbett and Michael P. Noonan, 263–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. “Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 305–328.
Putnam, Michael and Liliana Sánchez. 2013. “What So Incomplete About Incomplete Acquisition? A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Grammars.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4): 478–508.
Ramat, Anna Giacalone. 1997. “Progressive Periphrases, Markedness, and Second Language Data.” In Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen, ed. by Stig Eliasson and Ernst Hakon Jahr, 261–286. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, Sarah Julianne. 1999. “The TMA System of Hawaiian Creole and Diffusion.” In Creole Genesis, Attitudes, and Discourse: Studies Celebrating Charlene J. Sato, ed. by John R. Rickford and Suzanne Romaine, 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ross, John Robert. 1972. “Act.” In Semantics of Natural Language, ed. by David Davidson and Gilbert Herman, 76–120. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sánchez, Liliana. 2003. Quechua-Spanish Bilingualism: Interference and Convergence in Functional Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2004. “Functional Convergence in the Tense, Evidentiality and Aspectual Systems of Quechua Spanish Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 147–162.
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1993. “On the Permeability of Grammars: Evidence from Spanish and English Contact.” In Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages, ed. by William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun and Giorgio Perissinotto, 19–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorace, Antonella. 2006. “Gradedness and Optionality in Mature and Developing Grammars.” In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspective, ed. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel and Matthais Schlesewsky, 106–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stiebels, Barbara and Dieter Wunderlich. 1994. “Morphology Feeds Syntax: The Case of Particle Verbs.” Linguistics 32(6): 913–968.
Stroik, Thomas and Michael Putnam. 2013. The Structural Design of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline. 2004. “Convergence as an Optimization Strategy in Bilingual Speech: Evidence from Code-Switching.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 165–173.
Van Pottelberge, Jeroen. 2004. Der am-Progressive: Struktur und parallele Entwicklung in den kontinentalwestgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Roberta D’Alessandro, Michael T Putnam & Silvia Terenghi
Bousquette, Joshua, Robert Klosinski & Michael T. Putnam
Kinn, Kari & George Walkden
Blevins, Margaret
2018. Towards a constructional analysis of the progressive aspect in Texas German. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 73 ff.
Brown, Joshua R.
Pierce, Marc, Hans C. Boas & Karen A. Roesch
2015. The History of Front Rounded Vowels in New Braunfels German. In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 117 ff.
Westergaard, Marit & Merete Anderssen
2015. Word Order Variation in Norwegian Possessive Constructions. In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 21 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
