In:History of Linguistics 2021: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS 15), Milan, 28 August – 1 September
Edited by Savina Raynaud, Maria Paola Tenchini and Enrica Galazzi
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 133] 2024
► pp. 31–46
Chapter 2Type or descent?
The philosophical, romantic, and biological sources of typology in Soviet linguistics of the 1920s–1940s
Published online: 28 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.133.02ser
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.133.02ser
Either science aims at universal validity, or it is no science. The idea that science can be
culturally or nationally determined is unanimously considered as an outdated Romantic cliché. Nonetheless, it is usual
to speak of the Western thought, without wondering where its Eastern limit is to be found. In the history of
linguistics, Russian science of language is often proclaimed by Russian thinkers as being “fundamentally different”
from Western linguistics. This paradox is examined here after R. Jakobson’s works in the interwar period and their
links to Goethe’s and Naturphilosophie research in biology: idealistic morphology appears to be a way
towards typology.
Keywords: function, Goethe, Jakobson, metaphor, metonymy, Naturphilosophie, Russian linguistics, teleology, tradition, typology, Western thought
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Absolute Russian specificity
- 3.The enigma of similarity
- 4.On the sources of typology: Similarity without a common ancestor
- 5.The theory of types
- 6.Metaphor and metonymy
Notes References
References (31)
Berezin, Fedor M. 1976. Russkoe
iazykoznanie kontsa XIX — nachala XX v. [Russian linguistics of
the late XIX — early XX
century]. Moskva: Nauka.
Berg Lev. 1922. Nomogenez, ili èvoliuciia na osnove
zakonomernostei, Petrograd: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo. English translation: Nomogenesis, or
evolution determined by
law, London, 1926.
Danilevsky, Nikolai. 1869. Rossiia i Evropa, Vzgliad na kul’turnye i politicheskie otnosheniia slavianskogo mira k
germano-romanskomu [Russia and Europe: a view of cultural and
political relations between the Slavic and Germano-Roman worlds]. Sankt Peterburg: Tipografiia bratiev Panteleevykh.
. 1885. Darvinizm: kriticheskoe izsledovanie [Darwinism: a
critical study], 2 vols. Sankt Peterburg: Komarov.
Garvin, Paul; Lunt, Horace & Stankiewicz Edward. 1963 (19802). Current
Trends in Linguistics. Vol. I: Soviet and East European Linguistics. The Hague; Paris & New York: Mouton.
Goethe Johann Wolfgang. 1830. “Principes de philosophie zoologique”, Schriften zur
Anatomie, Zoologie,
Physiognomik. Reprint 1962. München: dtv: 151–178.
Jakobson, Roman. 1929. “Über die heutigen Voraussetzungen der russischen Slavistik”, Slavische
Rundschau, 1: 629–646. Reprint
in Elmar Holenstein (ed.): Roman Jakobson. Semiotik. Ausgewählte Texte 1919–1982, Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 1992: 50–70.
. 1931. “K kharakteristike evraziiskogo iazykovogo
soiuza”, Paris: Evraziiskoe izdatel’stvo. English
transl. 2023. “The Eurasian language
union”, The Limits of Structuralism, J. McElveny (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press: 159–204.
. 1938. “Sur la théorie des affinités phonologiques entre les langues”, Actes du IVe Congrès international des linguistes tenu à Copenhague du 27 août au 1er
septembre 1936, Copenhague: Einar Munskgaard: 48–58; reprinted in a
modified version in Jakobson, 1971: 234–246.
. 1956. “Two
aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances”, Fundamentals of
Language, The Hague: Mouton: 55–82; reprinted
in Jakobson, 1971: 237–259.
. 1960. “Linguistics
and Poetics”, in Style in
Language, edited by T. Sebeok. Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 350–377.
Katsnelson, Solomon. 1983. “Lingvisticheskaja
tipologiia” [Linguistic typology], Voprosy
iazykoznaniia 3: 9–20; 4: 19–34. Reprint
in Katsnelson, S. 2001. Kategorii iazyka i myshlenia [The Categories of
Language and
Thought]. Moskva: Iazyki slavianskoi kultury: 713–755.
Kolesov, Vladimir. 1991. “Razvitie lingvisticheskikh idei u vostochnykh slavian epokhi
Srednevekoviia” [The development of linguistic ideas among
the Eastern Slavs in the Middle Ages]. Istoria lingvisticheskikh
uchenii. Pozdnee Srednevekovie [History of linguistic theories.
Late Middle Ages], edited by A. Desnickaia. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka: 208–254.
Liubishchev, Aleksandr. 1977. “Ponjatie sistemnosti i organizovannosti (predvaritel’nyj nabrosok)” [The concept of consistency
and organization (preliminary outline)], Trudy po znakovym
sistemam, 9: 134–141.
McElvenny James (ed.). 2023. The
Limits of Structuralism. Forgotter Sources in the History of Modern
Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meillet, Antoine. 1921. “Le problème de la parenté des langues”, in
Id. Linguistique historique et linguistique
générale. Paris: Champion: 76–101.
Nisbet H. B. 1972. Goethe
and the Scientific Tradition, University of London, Institute of Germanic Studies.
Serdiuchenko, Georgii. 1931: “Staroe
i novoe v nauke o jazyke” [The old and the new in the science of language], Na
podieme, 4: 156–175.
Sériot, Patrick. 2014. Structure
and the Whole. East, West and non-Darwinian Biology in the Origins of Structural
Linguistics. Boston & Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Toman, Jindřich, ed. 1994. Letters
and Other Materials from the Moscow and Prague Linguistic
Circles, 1912–1945. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications / Cahiers Roman Jakobson 1.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1932. “Das Morwinische phonologische System verglichen mit dem
Russischen”, in Charisteria Guilelmo V.
Methesio quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici
oblata, Prague: svmptibvs “Pražský linguistický kroužek”, 21–24. Reprint in
Russian translation: N. S. Trubetzkoi. Izbrannye trudy po fonologii [Selected works on
Phonemics]. Moskva: Progress, 1987: 63–66.
