In:History of Linguistics 2014: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014
Edited by Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes and Rolf Kemmler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 126] 2016
► pp. 247–256
Polysemy in 19th century linguistic studies in Chile
Attitudes and ideology
Published online: 17 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.19roj
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.19roj
This paper analyzes the attitudes towards polysemy in the works of Chilean Spanish-speaking grammarians and lexicographers from the nineteenth century. These attitudes are mainly negative: the authors consider that words should have only one meaning (the “proper” meaning). Such a belief can be best understood within the frame of standard language ideology. As this language ideology aims for reduction of linguistic variation, the existence of semasiological variation (i.e., polysemy) becomes the subject of negative evaluation. Moreover, we underline the political motivations of such ideology and attitudes towards polysemy.
References (24)
Bello, Andrés. 1847. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Santiago, Chile: Imprenta del Progreso.
. 1883. “Correcciones lexicográficas”. Obras completas de don Andrés Bello. Tomo VIII: Opúsculos literarios i críticos III, ed. by Miguel Luis Amunátegui Reyes, lxix–lxxvii. Santiago, Chile: Imprenta de Pedro Ramírez.
Del Solar, Fidelis. 1876. Reparos al “Diccionario de chilenismos” del señor don Zorobabel Rodríguez. Santiago, Chile: Imprenta de Federico Schrebler.
Gormaz, Valentín. 1860. Correcciones lexigráficas sobre la lengua castellana en Chile. Valparaíso: Imprenta del Comercio.
Ortúzar, Camilo. 1893. Diccionario manual de locuciones viciosas y de correcciones de lenguaje. San Benigno Canavese: Imprenta Salesiana.
Arnoux, Elvira Narvaja de. 2008. Los discursos sobre la nación y el lenguaje en la formación del Estado (Chile, 1842–1862). Estudio glotopolítico. Buenos Aires: Santiago Arcos.
Auroux, Sylvain. 2009. A revolução tecnológica da gramatização. Translated by Eni Puccinelli Orlandi. Second edition. Campinas: Unicamp.
Avilés, Tania & Darío Rojas. 2014. “Argumentación y estandarización lingüística: creencias normativas en el Diccionario de chilenismos (1875) de Zorobabel Rodríguez”. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística 85.142–163.
Blommaert, Jan, ed. 1999. Language Ideological Debates (= Language, Power and Social Process, 2). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brahm, Enrique. 1992. “La crisis del conservantismo chileno en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX. Política, gobierno y régimen de gobierno en el itinerario intelectual de don Ramón Sotomayor Valdés”. Revista Chilena de Derecho 19:1.7–33.
Collier, Simon & William F. Sater. 2004. A History of Chile, 1808–2002. Second edition (= Cambridge Latin American studies, 82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geeraerts, Dirk. [2003] 2006. “Cultural models of linguistic standardization”. Words and other wonders: Papers on lexical and semantic topics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, René Dirven & John R. Taylor (= Cognitive Linguistics Research, 33), 272–306. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaksic, Iván. 2001. Andrés Bello: Scholarship and Nation-Building in nineteenth-century Latin America (= Cambridge Latin American Studies, 87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milroy, James. 2001. “Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5:4.530–555.
Milroy, James & Leslie Milroy. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English (= Routledge Linguistics Classics). London: Routledge.
Nerlich, Brigitte. 2003. “Polysemy: past and present”. Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language, ed. by Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman and David D. Clarke (= Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, 142), 49–76. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rojas, Darío. 2014. “Diccionario y estandarización lingüística en Hispanoamérica: la visión de Ramón Sotomayor Valdés (1866)”. Estudios Filológicos 53.109–121.
Subercaseaux, Bernardo. 2011. Historia de las ideas y la cultura en Chile: desde la Independencia hasta el Bicentenario. Tome 1, volume 1: Sociedad y cultura liberal en el siglo XIX. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Swiggers, Pierre. 2012. “Linguistic historiography: object, methodology, modelization”. Todas as Letras 14:1.38–53.
Velleman, Barry L. 2002. “Linguistic anti-academicism and Hispanic community: Sarmiento and Unamuno”. The Battle over Spanish between 1800 and 2000. Language ideologies and Hispanic intellectuals, ed. by José del Valle and Luis Gabriel-Stheeman (= Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics), 14–41. London & New York: Routledge.
Watts, Richard J. 2008. “Grammar writers in eighteenth-century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community?”. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (= Topics in English Linguistics, 59), 37–56. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilton, Antje & Holger Wochele. 2011. “Linking past and present. A view of historical comments about language”. AILA Review 24.55–67.
