Cover not available

In:History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 127–136

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Earlier and later anti-psychologism in linguistics

 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.11elf
Psychologism has been a mainstream view in linguistics throughout many centuries. Serious and prominent anti-psychologism flourished in the first half of the 20th century, mainly in European structuralism. As a minority view, mostly dubbed ‘anti-mentalism’, anti-psychologism resurfaced in the 1970s in reaction to Chomsky’s strong psychologism. I will show that, in spite of differences due to their relationship to divergent problem contexts, the earlier and later varieties of anti-psychologism share as a common kernel a full recognition of the intentional character of language. However, the locus of intentionality differs between the two.
References (17)
References
Antal, László. 1984. “Psychologism, platonism and realism in linguistics”. Word 35.163–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baaren, Robbert van. 1996. “Brentano’s intentionaliteitsbegrip en het ontstaan van de psychologie als wetenschap”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 87.136–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf. 1992. Twentieth-century conceptions of language: mastering the metaphysics market. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, Philip. 1984. Linguistic realities. An autonomist metatheory for the generative enterprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, David. 1975. Knowledge of language. London: Prism Press & New York: Humanities Press Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael. 2006. Ignorance of language. Oxford: Clarendon press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elffers, Els. 1998. “Linguistics and psychology; how should we reconstruct their relationship?” Metahistoriography. Theoretical and methodological aspects in the historiography of linguistics, ed. by Peter Schmitter & Marijke van der Wal, 87–106. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia. 2004. A history of language philosophies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John 
Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio. 2001. 200 Years of Syntax: A critical survey. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1973. Main Trends in the Science of Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold. 1981. Language and other abstract objects. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Geschichte der psychologischen Sprachauffassung in Deutschland von 1850 bis 1920. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marty, Anton. 1908. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer. (1st edition 1880).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue