In:History of Linguistics 2008: Selected papers from the eleventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XI), 28 August - 2 September 2008, Potsdam
Edited by Gerda Haßler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 115] 2011
► pp. 147–165
The earliest stages of Persian-German language comparison
Published online: 22 April 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.115.15van
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.115.15van
Renaissance Europe (re)discovered Persia and its language. Despite the supposed Semitic nature of Persian, some striking lexical similarities between this language and the Germanic languages became unmistakable to many Western scholars. Until the elaboration of comparative linguistics as an autonomous academic discipline at the beginning of the nineteenth century, Dutch (or German) and Persian were often considered to have a privileged relationship, an idea which gave birth to the so-called “Persian-German theory”. This contribution aims to shed new light on the earliest stages of Persian and German vocabulary comparison carried out by Dutch humanists. The role played by Franciscus Raphelengius (senior), Justus Lipsius, Josephus Justus Scaliger will be re-evaluated. Furthermore, Hugo Grotius’s and Marnix van Sint-Aldegonde’s contribution, which has been largely overlooked in this connection, will be focused upon. The remainder of the paper will discuss the various approaches to the Persian-Germanic hypothesis after its initial formulation.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
