In:History of Linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS X), 1–5 September 2005, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
Edited by Douglas A. Kibbee
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 112] 2007
► pp. 404–415
Meaning by collocation: The Firthian filiation of corpus linguistics
Published online: 28 November 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.112.31leo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.112.31leo
In my paper, I would like to address the issue of collocation works, starting from Firth’s view on meaning by collocation, in order to see how it has been worked out in Corpus Linguistics. Meaning by collocation, first conceived by Firth as lexical meaning, concerned, later in his work, not only words but phrases, compounds, turns of phrases, and even inferior units such as morphemes. It can be said that Firth restricted collocations to words when he put forward methodological indications in order to achieve practical aims, such as dictionaries and translation. Firth then specified that the collocations of selected ‘key’ or ‘pivotal’ words should be searched for in whole attested texts. Among his followers, Halliday and Sinclair set up the theoretical and methodological conditions of studying Firth’s meaning by collocation systematically in the 1960s. Collocation has since become one of the main issues of Corpus Linguistics; however, many questions raised by computerbased collocation research have still remained unsolved.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Sheehan, Shane, Masood Masoodian & Saturnino Luz
Léon, Jacqueline
Léon, Jacqueline
Khan, Jahangeer & Chengyu Liu
Luz, Saturnino & Shane Sheehan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
