Cover not available

In:Ditransitives in Germanic Languages: Synchronic and diachronic aspects
Edited by Eva Zehentner, Melanie Röthlisberger and Timothy Colleman
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 7] 2023
► pp. 226–263

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Chapter EPUB

Exploring variation in the dative alternation across World Englishes

 | Universität Zürich
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 August 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.7.07rot
Abstract
The present chapter explores the variable nature of speakers’ (probabilistic) grammar by analysing variation in the English dative alternation across World Englishes. While the numerous constraints that impact the choice of variant are well-known, the extent to which the regional variability of these constraints in specific registers or lexical items can be generalized to the language as a whole has largely remained understudied (but see, e.g., Bresnan and Ford 2010; Röthlisberger, Grafmiller, and Szmrecsanyi 2017). The current study takes a comprehensive large-scale comparative perspective across nine varieties, 14 different registers and including 86 alternating verbs (N = 13,171) to showcase how restrictions in the dataset (e.g. to specific registers or verbs) can result in misleading generalizations. Results of mixed-effects regression analyses indicate that the factors regionally variable across the whole dataset might not be regionally variable across specific registers. Thus, the present chapter not only confirms the variable nature of probabilistic grammars but also stresses the importance of combining an aggregate perspective with more fine-grained analyses to grasp more fully the cross-lectal variability of speakers’ grammatical knowledge.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
    • 2.1The data
    • 2.2Explanatory factors
      • 2.2.1Length (factor name: WeightRatio)
      • 2.2.2Pronominality (RecPron / ThemePron)
      • 2.2.3Discourse givenness (RecGivenness / ThemeGivenness)
      • 2.2.4Definiteness (RecDefiniteness / ThemeDefiniteness)
      • 2.2.5Animacy (RecAnimacy / ThemeAnimacy)
      • 2.2.6Verb semantics and verb sense (VerbSemantics / VerbSense)
      • 2.2.7Structural persistence (PrimeType)
      • 2.2.8Frequency (RecHeadFreq / ThemeHeadFreq)
      • 2.2.9Context-related factors and corpus structure
    • 2.3Specific domains of language use
    • 2.4Statistical analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Regional variation on the global level
    • 3.2Variation by register and verb
      • 3.2.1Spoken vs written language
      • 3.2.2Formality and mode
      • 3.2.3give and send
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (53)
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. “Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern.” Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Edwin Kuh, and Roy E. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. “The Dative Alternation in South Asian English(Es): Modelling Predictors and Predicting Prototypes.” English World-Wide 35 (1): 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, and Alexandra Cleland. 2000. “Syntactic Co-Ordination in Dialogue.” Cognition 75 (2): B13–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen. 2007. “Predicting the Dative Alternation.” In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, ed. by Gerlof Boume, Irene Kraemer, and Joost Zwarts, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford. 2010. “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay. 2008. “Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zealand and American English.” Lingua 118 (2): 245–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic, and Saartje Verbeke. 2013. “Dative Alternation in Indian English: A Corpus-Based Analysis.” World Englishes 32 (2): 169–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, John. 2003. “Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (15): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, and Susan Garnsey. 2004. “Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation.” Language 80 (4): 748–775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garretson, Gregory, M. Catherine O’Connor, Barbora Skarabela, and Marjorie Hogan. 2004. “Coding Practices Used in the Project ‘‘Optimality Typology of Determiner Phrases’’.” MS. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2005. “Lectal Variation and Empirical Data in Cognitive Linguistics.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interactions, ed. by Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez and M. Sandra Peña Cervel, 163–189. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers, and Peter Bakema. 1994. The Structure of Lexical Variation: A Descriptive Framework for Cognitive Lexicology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine 27 (15): 2865–2873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. “Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-Based Approach.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34 (4): 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Stefanie Wulff. 2005. “Do Foreign Language Learners Also Have Constructions? Evidence from Priming, Sorting, and Corpora.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 182–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. “The English Comparative: Language Structure and Language Use.” English Language and Linguistics 12 (3): 395–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosmer, David, and Stanley Lemeshow. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler, Joan Bresnan, and Gerard Van Herk. 2011. “The Dative Alternation in African American English: Researching Syntactic Variation and Change across Sociolinguistic Datasets.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7 (2): 229–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2013. “How Language Production Shapes Language Form and Comprehension.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (226): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, Kim. 2006. “Interaction and Syntactic Priming: English L2 Speakers’ Production of Dative Constructions.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (2): 179–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menard, Scott. 2010. Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Applications. Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. “Describing Verb-Complementational Profiles of New Englishes: A Pilot Study of Indian English.” English World-Wide 27 (2): 147–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olavarría de Ersson, Eugenia, and Philip Shaw. 2003. “Verb Complementation Patterns in Indian Standard English.” English World-Wide 24 (2): 137–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Stefan Grondelaers, and Freek Van de Velde. 2018. “Why and How We Need to Incorporate the Multi-Level Nature of the Constructicon into Corpus Research.” Presented at the International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-10), Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinheiro, José C., and Douglas M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL].
Rosenbach, Anette. 2008. “Animacy and Grammatical Variation: Findings from English Genitive Variation.” Lingua 118 (2): 151–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie. 2021a. Between context and community: Regional variation in register effects in the English dative alternation. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation (eds.), Elena Seoane & Douglas Biber, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 111-142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. “Social Constraints on Syntactic Variation: The Role of Gender in Jamaican English Ditransitive Constructions.” In Gender in World Englishes, ed. by Tobias Bernaisch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. “Regional Variation in Probabilistic Grammars: A Multifactorial Study of the English Dative Alternation.” PhD dissertation, Leuven: KU Leuven.
. 2018b. “The Dative Dataset of World Englishes.” KU Leuven. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Jason Grafmiller, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2017. “Cognitive Indigenization Effects in the English Dative Alternation.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 (4): 673–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea. 2004. “Shared Morpho-Syntactic Features in Contact Varieties of English: Article Use.” World Englishes 23 (2): 281–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Joybrato Mukherjee, Christopher Nam, and Sach Mukherjee. 2013. “Complementation of Ditransitive Verbs in South Asian Englishes: A Multifactorial Analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (2): 187–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2013. Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Simon Todd. 2017. “Spoken Syntax in a Comparative Perspective: The Dative and Genitive Alternation in Varieties of English.” Glossa 2 (1): 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2014. “A Comparative Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Dative Alternation.” In Linguistic Variation: Confronting Fact and Theory, ed. by Rena Torres-Cacoullos, Nathalie Dion, and André Lapierre, 297–318. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theijssen, Daphne, Joan Bresnan, Marilyn Ford, and Lou Boves. 2011. “In a Land Far Far Away… A Probabilistic Account of the Dative Alternation in British, American, and Australian English. Manuscript.” Manuscript.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theijssen, Daphne, Louis Ten Bosch, Lou Boves, Bert Cranen, and Hans van Halteren. 2013. “Choosing Alternatives: Using Bayesian Networks and Memory-Based Learning to Study the Dative Alternation.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (2): 227–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. “Dative and Genitive Variability in Late Modern English: Exploring Cross-Constructional Variation and Change.” Diachronica 30 (3): 382–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, Mary Catherine O’Connor, and Thomas Wasow. 2004. “Animacy Encoding in English: Why and How.” In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July 2004, ed. by Donna Byron and Bonnie Webber, 118–125. East Strouddsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuur, Alain F., Elena N. Ieno, Neil J. Walker, Anatoly A. Saveliev, and Graham M. Smith. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Liu, Zoey, Haiyin Yang & Stefanie Wulff
2025. Modeling the Dative Alternation in English Early Child Language. Open Mind 9 ► pp. 1066 ff. DOI logo
Long, Yijun & Haitao Liu
2025. Measuring complexity of the objects of the verb give across English varieties: a study of constituent length and dependency distance. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue