Cover not available

In:Ditransitives in Germanic Languages: Synchronic and diachronic aspects
Edited by Eva Zehentner, Melanie Röthlisberger and Timothy Colleman
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 7] 2023
► pp. 19–55

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Chapter EPUB

The emergence of the English dative alternation as a response to system-wide changes

An Evolutionary Game Theory approach

 | Universität Zürich
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 August 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.7.01zeh
Abstract
This chapter revisits the much-discussed question whether a causal relationship holds between several changes observed in the history of English; these are (a) the increasing use of prepositional patterns, (b) the loss of nominal case marking, and (c) the fixation of constituent order. Located within the same time-period, namely Middle English, there is relatively broad consensus that the processes are correlated. However, the extent and directionality of causation is highly debated. This chapter addresses this issue by taking another look at a specific case study which reflects all the changes: the history of the dative alternation. To add to results from earlier corpus-based investigations on this development, the emergence of the alternation is modelled by means of Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT). Specifically, the study tests the hypothesis that the increase of prepositional ditransitives and ultimately the dative alternation is a consequence of case marking being lost and constituent order becoming fixed, and discusses the potential benefits of taking an EGT approach to such questions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Changes in the history of the English dative alternation
    • 2.1Increase of prepositional patterns and the rise of the dative alternation
    • 2.2Loss of case marking
    • 2.3Fixation of constituent order
    • 2.4Correlations and causal effects
  • 3.(Evolutionary) game theory
    • 3.1Introduction to (E)GT
    • 3.2EGT applications to (historical) linguistics: Potential uses
  • 4.An EGT approach to the history of the English dative alternation
    • 4.1Set-up of the model
    • 4.2Input and results of the model
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (100)
References
Alcorn, Rhona. 2011. “Pronouns, Prepositions and Probabilities: A Multivariate Study of Old English Word Order.” Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Changes in Case Marking in NP: From Old English to Middle English.” In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case, ed. by Mengistu Amberber, and Helen de Hoop, 223–249. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Case Syncretism and Word Order Change.” In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade, and Bettelou Los, 201–223. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2009. “The Development of Case in Germanic.” In The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, and Shobhana Chelliah, 123–159. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Kristian Kristoffersen, and Andreas Sveen. 2011. “West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a Family of Constructions: With a Special Attention to the Norwegian V–REFL–NP Construction.” Linguistics 49 (1): 53–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert, and Thomas Cable. 2002. A History of the English Language. (5th edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2001. “Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study.” Bergen: University of Bergen Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertacca, Antonio. 2009. Natural Morphology and the Loss of Nominal Inflections in English. Pisa: PLUS-Pisa UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 2001. Case. (2nd edn.). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 2001. Old English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, John, and Michael Tanenhaus. 1975. “Prolegomena to a Functional Theory of Word Formation.” In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, ed. by Robin Grossman, Timothy Vance, and James San. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic. 1938. “The Background in Old English of the Modern English Substitutes for the Dative-Object in the Group Verb + Dative-Object +Accusative-Object.” Ann Arbor, MA: University of Michigan Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colleman, Timothy, and Bernard De Clerck. 2009. “‘Caused Motion’? The Semantics of the English to-Dative and the Dutch aan-Dative.” Cognitive Linguistics 20 (1): 5–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colleman, Timothy, and Bernard De Clerck. 2011. “Constructional Semantics on the Move: On Semantic Specialization in the English Double Object Construction.” Cognitive Linguistics 22 (1): 183–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, and Polinsky, Maria. 1998. “Gender in a Historical Perspective: Radial Categories Meet Language Change.” In Language Change and Typological Variation: In Honor of Winfred P. Lehmann on the Occasion of his 83rd Birthday, ed. by Carol F. Justus, and Edgar C. Polomé, 566–589. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Evolutionary Models and Functional-Typological Theories of Language Change.” In Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade, and Bettelou Los, 68–91. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2010. “The Old English Double Object Alternation: A Discourse–Based Account.” Sprachwissenschaft 35: 337–368.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Debiasing Semantic Analysis: The Case of the English Preposition to.” Language Sciences 37: 122–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. “A Multivariate Analysis of the Old English ACC+DAT Double Object Alternation.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11 (2): 225–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2015b. “The Old English to–Dative Construction.”  English Language and Linguistics 19 (1): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2015. “The Semantic and Pragmatic Underpinnings of Grammaticalization Paths: The Progressive and the Imperfective.” Semantics and Pragmatics 8 (14): 1–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn, and Kristel van Goethem. 2018. “The Changing Functions of Competing Forms: Attraction and Differentiation.” Cognitive Linguistics 29 (2): 197–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vaere, Hilde, Ludovic De Cuypere, and Klaas Willems. 2020. “Alternating Constructions with Ditransitive ‘geben’ in Present-Day German.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. “Syntax.” In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2, ed. by Norman Blake, 207–408. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman, and Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer Olga, and Wim van der Wurff. 2006. “Syntax.” In A History of the English Language, ed. by Richard Hogg, and David Denison, 109–198. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna. 2013. “Give It Me! Pronominal Ditransitives in English Dialects.” English Language and Linguistics 17 (3): 445–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Ditransitives in British English Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2000. “Adjuncts and the Syntax of Subjects in Old and Middle English.” In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, ed. by Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, and Anthony Warner, 109–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 2010. Adpositions. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice, and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Typological Changes in the Lexicon: Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Ditransitive Constructions in the World’s Languages. Leipzig spring school on linguistic diversity. [URL] (accessed 18 April 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Ditransitive Constructions.” Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 19–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1994. “Grammaticalization as an Explanatory Parameter.” In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca, 255–287. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofbauer, Josef, and Karl Sigmund. 1998. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofbauer, Joseph, and Karl Sigmund. 2003. “Evolutionary Game Dynamics.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 40 (4): 479–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2005. Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-Based Study. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 2002. An Introduction to Old English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Wilhelm. 1921. Sprachkoerper und Sprachfunktion im Englischen. Berlin: Mayer and Mueller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis. 2011. Semantic Erosion of Middle English Prepositions. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard. 2004. Evolutionary Game Theory for Linguists: A Primer. (unpublished manuscript). University of Tübingen. [URL] (accessed 02 Sept 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Evolutionary Game Theory and Typology: A Case Study.” Language 83 (1): 74–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Applications of Game Theory in Linguistics.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (3): 408–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon, Tom Griffiths, and Kenny Smith. 2014. Iterated Learning and the Evolution of Language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 108–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi, and Jussi Ylikoski. 2011. “Introduction to Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles.” In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles, ed. by Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi, and Jussi Ylikoski, 1–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, Willem. 1990. “Word Order in Old English.” Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, Willem, and Wim van der Wurff. 2000. “Two Word Order Patterns in the History of English: Stability, Variation, Change.” In Stability, Variation and Change of Word-Order Patterns over Time, ed. by Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe, and Ariel Shisha–Halevy, 259–283. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, and Ann Taylor. 1997. “Verb Movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact.” In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, ed. by Ans van Kemenade, and Nigel Vincent, 297–325. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000a. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, Second Edition. [URL] (accessed 02 Sept 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. “Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English.” In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, ed. by Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, and Anthony Warner, 132–187. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2009. “Evolution of Case Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Case, ed. by Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer, 439–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principle of Change, Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. “Phonology and Morphology.” In The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476, ed. by Norman Blake, 23–155. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2015. A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: EUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundskær–Nielsen, Tom. 1993. Prepositions in Old and Middle English (NOWELE Supplement 9). Odense: Odense UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie. 2010. “Ditransitive Constructions: A Typological Overview.” In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions, ed. by Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie, 1–64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, and George Price. 1973. “The Logic of Animal Conflict.”  Nature 246: 15–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2002. “The Rise of the to-Dative in Middle English.” In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, ed. by David Lightfoot, 107–123. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Vol. 1. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, John. 1950. “Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36 (1): 48–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1999. “Making the Best Use of ‘Bad’ Data: Evidence for Sociolinguistic Variation in Early Modern English.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100 (4): 499–533.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin A. 2000. “The Basic Reproductive Ratio of a Word, the Maximum Size of a Lexicon.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 204: 179–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogura, Michiko. 1980. The Syntactic and Semantic Rivalry of Quoth, Say and Tell in Medieval English. Japan: Kufs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara. 2002. “Double Objects and Morphological Triggers for Syntactic Case.” In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, ed. by David Lightfoot, 124–142. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, Heidi. 2005. The Distribution of Case Forms in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 2004. Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: A Darwinian Approach to Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus, and Andreas Baumann. 2012. “Transferring Mathematics to English Studies.” In Transfer in English Studies, ed. by Manfred Markus, and Herbert Schendl, 219–237. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Evolutionary Game Theory in Historical Language Studies.” Abstract presented at the 10th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (EVOLANG X), Vienna, April 14–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte, and Freek Van de Velde. 2020. “On Cause and Correlation in Language Change: Word Order and Clefting in Brazilian Portuguese.” Language Dynamics and Change. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael. 1972. Linguistic Evolution: With Special Reference to English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiler, Guido. 2006. “The Role of Functional Factors in Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach.” In Different Models of Linguistic Change, ed. by Ole Nedergård Thomsen, 163–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. “Analyticity and Syntheticity in the History of English.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Traugott, 654–665. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, and Susan Pintzuk. 2015. “Verb Order, Object Position, and Information Status in Old English.” In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, and George Walkden, 318–335. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter, and Leo Jonker. 1978. “Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics.” Mathematical Biosciences 40: 145–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra. 1995. “The Iconicity of ‘Dative Shift’ in English: Considerations from Information Flow in Discourse.” In Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension, ed. by Marge Landsberg, 155–175. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. “Syntax.” In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 1, ed. by Richard Hogg, 168–289. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Trijp, Remi. 2013. “Linguistic Assessment Criteria for Explaining Language Change: A Case Study on Syncretism in German Definite Articles.” Language Dynamics and Change 3: 105–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The Evolution of Case Grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Zhijian, Bin Xu, and Hai-Jun Zhou. 2014. “Social Cycling and Conditional Responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors Game.” Scientific Reports 4: 5830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. “Dative and Genitive Variability in Late Modern English.” Diachronica 30 (3): 382–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yáñez–Bouza, Nuria, and David Denison. 2015. “Which Comes First in the Double Object Construction? Diachronic and Dialectal Variation.” English Language and Linguistics 19 (2): 247–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva. 2017. “Ditransitives in Middle English: On Semantic Specialisation and the Rise of the Dative Alternation.” English Language and Linguistics 22 (1): 149–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva, and Marianne Hundt. 2021. “Prepositions in Early Modern English Argument Structure and beyond.” In English Historical Linguistics: Change in Structure and Meaning, ed. by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone, and Graeme Trousdale, 201–224. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1992. “Some Choices in the Theory of Morphology.” In Formal Grammar, ed. by Robert Levine, 327–371. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue