In:Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian
Edited by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Hjalmar P. Petersen and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 1] 2017
► pp. 91–112
Determining the nature of intra-speaker subject case variation
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.04now
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.04now
Abstract
Extensive syntactic surveys show that variation in subject case appears in both Insular Scandinavian languages. The results furthermore indicate that intra-speaker variation is widespread and that Person-Specific Retention (PSR) is one of the characteristics of the variation in both Icelandic and Faroese. Many questions on the nature of the variation remain unanswered and no formal account of the PSR has been provided. In this paper I shed light on the subject by presenting new data from Icelandic, Faroese and heritage North-American Icelandic. Experimental language acquisition data can be particularly decisive regarding the nature of the intra-speaker variation and the variation and PSR can be accounted for formally within Yang’s (2002, 2016) variational model of acquisition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies: Major findings and unsolved problems
- 2.1Distribution
- 2.1.1Person-Specific Retention (PSR)
- 2.1.2Mixed case marking (MCM)
- 2.2Language acquisition
- 2.1Distribution
- 3.Study
- 3.1Methodology
- 3.1.1Survey design
- 3.1.2Additional data
- 3.1Methodology
- 4.Results
- 4.1Survey
- 4.1.1The distribution of cases with langa
- 4.1.2Accusative Substitution with finnast
- 4.2Naturalistic data
- 4.2.1Language sample corpus
- 4.2.2Collected examples
- 4.1Survey
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Rules over words
- 5.2Variable input and intra-speaker variation
- 5.2.1First and second person singular accusative as a (productive) rule
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (24)
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna. 2006. North-American Icelandic. The Life of a Language. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Björgvinsdóttir, Ragnheiður. 2003. Frumlagsfall í máli barna. [‘Subject case in child language.’] Unpublished BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Clahsen, Harold, Sonja Eisenbeiß and Anne Vainikka. 1994. “The Seeds of Structure.” In Studies in Generative Grammar, ed. by Teun Hoekstra and Bonnie Schwartz, 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Einarsdóttir, Jóhanna. 2014. Gagnabanki Jóhönnu Einarsdóttur um málsýni (GJEUM). [‘Jóhanna Einarsdóttir’s data bank.’]
Erlingsdóttir, Gyða. 2010. Hún finnst ekki tannkrem gott. Um fallmörkun frumlaga í barnamáli. [‘She doesn’t like toothpaste. On subject case marking in child language.’] Unpublished BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Ingason, Anton K. 2011. “A Death Rattle Hypothesis for Minority Rules.” Poster presented at DiGS 13, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, and Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2005. “Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28 (2): 223–245.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2013. “Two Types of Case Variation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (1): 5–25.
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. “Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.
. 2001. “Syntactic Change.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ed. by Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nowenstein, Iris. 2012. Mig langar sjálfri til þess. Rannsókn á innri breytileika í fallmörkun frumlaga. [‘I want that myself. Investigation of intra-speaker variation in subject case marking.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [Accessible at [URL].]
. 2014. “Intra-speaker Variation in Subject Case: Icelandic.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 20(1), Article 28.
Pinker, Steven. 1995. “Why the Child Holded the Baby Rabbit. A Case Study in Language Acquisition.” In An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language, ed. by Lila Gleitman and Mark Liberman, 107–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schütze, Carson, and Jon Sprouse. 2014. “Judgment Data.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. by Robert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, 27–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sigurðardóttir, Herdís Þ. 2002. Fall í íslensku. Hvernig læra íslensk börn að nota föll? [‘Case in Icelandic. How do Icelandic children acquire case?’] Unpublished MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
. 2013. “Þágufallshneigð í sjón og raun. Niðurstöður spurningakannana í samanburði við málnotkun.” [‘Dative substitution, apparent and real. The results from questionnaires compared to language use.’] In Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð I, ed. by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Ásgrímur Angantýsson and Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, 83–110. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2013. “Ideal Speakers and Other Speakers. The Case of Dative and Other Cases.” In Variation in Datives – A Micro-Comparative Perspective, ed. by Beatriz Fenández and Ricardo Etxepare, 161–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2005. “On Productivity.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 265–302.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
