In:Prosody in Interaction
Edited by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber and Margret Selting
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23] 2010
► pp. 191–212
Intonation phrases in natural conversation
A participants’ category?
Published online: 22 December 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.16ree
https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.16ree
This chapter tests the usefulness of the category intonation phrase for the analysis of natural conversation. It asks whether the intonation phrase is a relevant unit for participants, and if so, whether it is a prosodic, or indeed an interactional category. The data show that while participants do divide their speech into intonation phrase-like chunks, these chunks are not defined by intonation alone. Instead, participants draw on a variety of interactional modes in their production of speech chunks, which are defined here as building blocks for turns and Turn Constructional Units. Chunks are shown to be employed as interactional units below the turn, and potentially below the Turn Constructional Unit; therefore the term Turn Constructional Phrase is suggested.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Bergmann, Pia & Alexandra Groß
Divin, Olivier
Inbar, Maya, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman & Ayelet N. Landau
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
Debras, Camille
Inbar, Maya, Eitan Grossman & Ayelet N. Landau
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Persson, Rasmus
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
