This book uses Conversation Analysis methodology to analyze rhetorical and other questions that are designed to convey assertions, rather than seek new information. It shows how these question sequences unfold interactionally in naturally-occurring talk in a variety of settings, e.g., friends arguing over the phone, parents disciplining children, news interviews, and second language writing conferences. The questions are used across these widely different contexts to perform a number of related social actions such as accusations, challenges to prior turns, and complaints. Those used in institution settings, such as teacher-student conferences, orient to institutional norms and roles and can help accomplish institutional goals, e.g., eliciting student error correction. Both the interactional context in which these questions are embedded and the known epistemic authority of the questioner play a role in our understanding of these questions, i.e., what social actions the question is accomplishing in a particular interaction.
2025. 641The Pragmatics of Rhetorical Questions in Sophocles’ Tragedies: An Analysis of Antigone and Electra
. In Advances in Ancient Greek Linguistics, ► pp. 641 ff.
Gubina, Alexandra
2025.
Countering Prior Interactional Conduct with Responsive
doch
in German Talk-in-Interaction
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 58:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
2024. Layers of Oriented‐to Identities in Language Learner Peer Discussion Tasks. TESOL Quarterly 58:4 ► pp. 1703 ff.
Camus, Laurent
2024. The sequential and reflexive achievement of coach participation in the live TV broadcasting of football. Sports Coaching Review 13:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Hermolle, Megan, Alexandra Kent, Abigail J. Locke & Samantha J. Andrews
2024. ‘Are We Sure That He Knew That You Don’t Want to Have Sex?’: Discursive Constructions of the Suspect in Police Interviews with Rape Complainants. Behavioral Sciences 14:9 ► pp. 837 ff.
2024. The Task of the Chinese Translator: Charles Bernstein’s “A Test of Poetry”. ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 37:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
2023. What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:5-6 ► pp. 497 ff.
Lee, Don
2023. Divergence in uncertainty: the Korean non-committal suffix -(u)lkel. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 697 ff.
Whitenton, Michael R.
2023. Questioning the Questions around Jesus’s Authority in Mark 11:27–33: A Performance Perspective. Religions 14:8 ► pp. 972 ff.
2022. The case of question-based exclamatives: From pragmatic rhetorical function to semantic meaning. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Feng, Jiayu
2022. How an utterance is regarded as implying disagreement: an analysis of confirmation requests in Japanese decision-making meetings. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Mackiewicz, Jo & Isabelle Thompson
2022. Students’ Questions in Writing Center Conferences. Written Communication 39:3 ► pp. 497 ff.
2022. I’m not going to have a conversation with you: Linguistic refusals of 1stAmendment YouTube auditors during police interactions. Communication and Democracy 56:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
Sevastjanova, Rita, Mennatallah El-Assady, Adam Bradley, Christopher Collins, Miriam Butt & Daniel Keim
2022. VisInReport: Complementing Visual Discourse Analytics Through Personalized Insight Reports. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28:12 ► pp. 4757 ff.
2021. Pursuing Common Ground: Nondisaffiliative Rhetorical Questions in Mandarin Conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:4 ► pp. 355 ff.
Zhang, Shuling
2021. The epistemics of advice-giving sequences: Epistemic primacy and subordination in advice rejection. Discourse Studies 23:6 ► pp. 705 ff.
Friedman, Debra A.
2020. Reflecting on the Research Interview as a Socializing Interaction. TESOL Quarterly 54:1 ► pp. 266 ff.
Pethica, Stefania, Jonathan Hill, Katy Jones, Paul Tranter, Steve Riley, Heather Lee & Michaela Swales
2020. Developing the therapeutic conversation: a conversation analysis of information giving in Family Domains Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 42:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn
2020. Shaming interrogatives: Admonishments, the social psychology of emotion, and discursive practices of behaviour modification in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology 59:2 ► pp. 347 ff.
2019. Does gender matter? A cross-national investigation of primary class-room discipline. Gender and Education 31:8 ► pp. 947 ff.
Raymond, Geoffrey & Jack Sidnell
2019. Interaction at the Boundaries of a World Known in Common: Initiating Repair with “What Do You Mean?”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Blythe, Joe, Rod Gardner, Ilana Mushin & Lesley Stirling
2018. Tools of Engagement: Selecting a Next Speaker in Australian Aboriginal Multiparty Conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Clayman, Steven E. & Laura Loeb
2018. Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
2018. Did Paul Refuse an Offer of Support from the Corinthians?. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 40:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Seuren, Lucas M., Mike Huiskes & Tom Koole
2018. Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences. Language in Society 47:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
Sunnen, Patrick, Béatrice Arend & Valérie Maquil
2018. “There Was No Green Tick”: Discovering the Functions of a Widget in a Joint Problem-Solving Activity and the Consequences for the Participants’ Discovering Process. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2:4 ► pp. 76 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018. On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
Boelé, Amy L.
2017. Does It Say That? Tensions in Teacher Questions When the Text Has the Final Say. Reading & Writing Quarterly 33:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
2017. Questions and Answers, A Seesaw and Embodied Action: How a Preschool Teacher and Children Accomplish Educational Practice. In Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction, ► pp. 37 ff.
2017.
Noticing Breaches with Nonpolar Interrogatives: Estonian
Kes
(“Who”) Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Nukuto, Hirokazu
2017. Code choice between L1 and the target language in English learning and teaching: a case study of Japanese EFL classrooms. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Sugiura, Hideyuki
2017. Expressing an alternative view from second position: Reversed polarity questions in everyday Japanese conversation. Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
2016. Qu’est-ce t’as été te mêler de ça ?!Une « nouvelle » structure pour les questions rhétoriques conflictuelles. Journal of French Language Studies 26:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Evans, Bryn & Richard Fitzgerald
2016. ‘It's Training Man’! Membership Categorization and the Institutional Moral Order of Basketball Training. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Hernández, Patricia, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. «Depuis quandle requin est un mammifère ?!?!?! » La pragmaticalisation de la séquence interrogativedepuis quand. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 12009 ff.
Kent, Alexandra & Kobin H. Kendrick
2016. Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 272 ff.
Laanesoo, Kirsi
2016. Targeting question’s inappositeness: The Estonian kus ‘where’-interrogative in the second position. Discourse Studies 18:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
2016. When Claims of Understanding Are Less Than Affiliative. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 167 ff.
Antaki, Charles, Emma Richardson, Elizabeth Stokoe & Sara Willott
2015. Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19:3 ► pp. 328 ff.
Drake, Veronika
2015.
Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-Final
Or
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
2015. Analyzing Storytelling In TESOL Interview Research. TESOL Quarterly 49:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Khamees, Khalid Sabie
2015. An Assessment of EFL Learners' Ability to Identify and Interpret Rhetorical Questions: A Pragmatic Perspective Study. SSRN Electronic Journal
Koike, Chisato
2015. Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:05 ► pp. 481 ff.
Prediger, Susanne, Uta Quasthoff, Anna-Marietha Vogler & Vivien Heller
2015. How to Elaborate What Teachers Should Learn? Five Steps for Content Specification of Professional Development Programs, Exemplified By “Moves Supporting Participation in Classroom Discussions”. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 36:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Reynolds, Edward
2015. How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Hoey, Elliott M.
2014. Sighing in Interaction: Somatic, Semiotic, and Social. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele & Johannes Wagner
2014. Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34 ► pp. 171 ff.
Kim, Mary Shin
2014. Reported Thought as a Stance-Taking Device in Korean Conversation. Discourse Processes 51:3 ► pp. 230 ff.
Kim, Mary Shin & Stephanie Hyeri Kim
2014. Initiating Repair With and Without Particles: Alternative Formats of Other-Initiation of Repair in Korean Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47:4 ► pp. 331 ff.
OAKLEY, TODD & VERA TOBIN
2014. The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Prokhorov, Kirill
2014. Focalization particles in Bambara. Mandenkan :52 ► pp. 60 ff.
Chiang, Shiao-Yun
2013. ‘The word isn't there!’: a Foucauldian approach to power negotiation in an instructional interaction across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Critical Discourse Studies 10:3 ► pp. 298 ff.
Deeb, Hadi Nicholas
2013. Boiling Down to the M‐Word at the California Supreme Court. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 23:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto & Shuya Kushida
2013.
Responding With Resistance to
Wh
-Questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2013. Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context. Classroom Discourse 4:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
2013. Japanese and English as Lingua Francas: Language Choices for International Students in Contemporary Japan. In Language Alternation, Language Choice and Language Encounter in International Tertiary Education [Multilingual Education, 5], ► pp. 31 ff.
Childs, Carrie
2012. ‘I’m not X, I just want Y’: Formulating ‘wants’ in interaction. Discourse Studies 14:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Clift, Rebecca
2012. Who Knew?: A View from Linguistics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Ghorbel, Hatem
2012. Experiments in Cross-Lingual Sentiment Analysis in Discussion Forums. In Social Informatics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7710], ► pp. 138 ff.
Heritage, John
2012. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Park, Innhwa
2012. Asking different types of polar questions: The interplay between turn, sequence, and context in writing conferences. Discourse Studies 14:5 ► pp. 613 ff.
Park, Innhwa
2017. Questioning as advice resistance: writing tutorial interactions with L2 writers. Classroom Discourse 8:3 ► pp. 253 ff.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Jonathan Clifton
2012. The interactional negotiation of group membership and ethnicity: The case of an interview with a former slave. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
2011. Soliciting Accounts With Why-Interrogatives in Conversation. Journal of Communication 61:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Lehmann, Devra
2011. Homosexuality in Classroom Discourse at an American Modern Orthodox High School. Journal of Jewish Education 77:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010.
Responses to
Wh
-Questions in English Conversation
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Radford, Julie
2010. Adult participation in children's word searches: on the use of prompting, hinting, and supplying a model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 24:2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. & Galina B. Bolden
2010. Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations. Discourse Studies 12:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Strong, Tom & Helen F. Massfeller
2010. Negotiating Post-Consultation ‘Homework’ Tasks Between Counselors and Clients. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 32:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Tracy, Karen & Jessica S. Robles
2010. Challenges of Interviewers' Institutional Positionings: Taking Account of Interview Content and the Interaction. Communication Methods and Measures 4:3 ► pp. 177 ff.
Koschmann, Timothy & Alan Zemel
2009. Optical Pulsars and Black Arrows: Discoveries as Occasioned Productions. Journal of the Learning Sciences 18:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2009. Managing Counterinformings: An Interactional Practice for Soliciting Information that Facilitates Reconciliation of Speakers' Incompatible Positions. Human Communication Research 35:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2020. One Type of Polar, Information-Seeking Question and Its Stance of Probability: Implications for the Preference for Agreement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2020. Revisiting Preference Organization in Context: A Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Responses to Information Seeking. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Strong, Tom
2009. Collaborative goal-setting: Counsellors and clients negotiating a counselling focus. Counselling Psychology Review 24:3-4 ► pp. 24 ff.
Tracy, Karen & Jessica Robles
2009. Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction. Discourse Studies 11:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Vehviläinen, Sanna
2009. Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Betz, Emma & Andrea Golato
2008.
Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Token
achja
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Epperson, Terrence W. & Alan Zemel
2008. Reports, requests, and recipient design: The management of patron queries in online reference chats. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59:14 ► pp. 2268 ff.
Halonen, Mia & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2008. Using niin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker's action as an exaggeration. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Heinemann, Trine
2008. Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele
2008. Discourse and Socially Shared Cognition. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 1824 ff.
Strong, Tom & Katie Turner
2008. Resourceful Dialogues: Eliciting and Mobilizing Client Competencies and Resources. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 38:4 ► pp. 185 ff.
FIRTH, ALAN & JOHANNES WAGNER
2007. Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal 91:s1 ► pp. 800 ff.
FIRTH, ALAN & JOHANNES WAGNER
2007. Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal 91:s1 ► pp. 800 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2007. Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:1 ► pp. 229 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2008. Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4 ► pp. 477 ff.
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2007. The multi‐functionality of accounts in advice giving1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.