Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 20:3 (2023) ► pp.574–598
First person singular subject pronoun expression of young Spanish speakers from Quito, Ecuador
Published online: 14 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.21015.del
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.21015.del
Abstract
This variationist study analyzes the first-person subject pronoun expression (SPE) of speakers from Quito, Ecuador. To date, this morphosyntactic variable has not been explored in this Andean variety of Spanish. The data consists of 20 sociolinguistic interviews. Results reveal an SPE rate of 17%, comparable to other Andean Spanish varieties. As per Rbrul’s quantitative analysis, the predictors that promote the presence of the ‘yo’ in this variety of Spanish are co-referential Priming, switch reference, ambiguous TMA endings and main clauses. In addition, following Orozco, Rafael, and Luz Marcela Hurtado. 2021. “A Variationist Study of Subject Pronoun Expression in Medellín, Colombia.” Languages 6 (1): 5. , lexical effects of the verb were observed by analyzing the verb lemma. This predictor revealed similarly opposing tendencies between verbs in the same lexical category. This study adds to the growing body of SPE research by examining which linguistic variables influence the use of ‘yo’ in this Ecuadorian Andean Spanish (EAS) variety and comparing these results to those of other Andean Spanish varieties.
Keywords: Subject pronoun expression, Quito, Ecuador, morphosyntactic variation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data and participants
- 3.2Envelope of variation
- 3.3Predictor variables examined
- 3.3.1Verb class
- 3.3.2Reference connection
- 3.3.3Ambiguity of the TMA ending
- 3.3.4Co-referential priming
- 3.3.5Reflexive use of the verb
- 3.3.6Clause type
- 3.3.7Verb lemma
- 4.Results
- 4.1Reference connection
- 4.2Ambiguity of TMA
- 4.3Clause type
- 4.4Verb lemma
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
References
References (58)
Adelaar, Willem F. H., and Pieter Muysken. 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge University Press.
Barrenechea, Ana María, and Alicia Alonso. 1973. “Los pronombres personales sujetos en el español hablado en Buenos Aires.” In Studia Iberica: Festschrift für Hans Flasche, 75–91. Francke Verlag.
Bayley, Robert, Norma Cárdenas, Belinda Treviño Schouten, and Carlos Martin Vélez. 2012. “Spanish Dialect Contact in San Antonio, Texas: An Exploratory Study.” In Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic linguistic symposium, 48–60. Sommerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1980. Why canto and not yo canto? The problem of first-person subject pronoun in spoken Venezuelan Spanish. Master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 1987. Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Vol. 131. Universidad Central de Venezuela, Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico.
Bessett, Ryan. 2018. “Testing English influence on first person singular ‘yo’ subject pronoun expression in Sonoran Spanish.” Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 151: 355–72.
Cameron, Richard. 1993. “Ambiguous Agreement, Functional Compensation, and Nonspecific Tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain.” Language Variation and Change 5 (3): 305–34.
Cameron, Richard, and Nydia Flores-Ferrán. 2004. “Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish.” Spanish in Context 1, no. 1: 41–65.
Carvalho, Ana M., and Michael Child. 2011. “Subject Pronoun Expression in a Variety of Spanish in Contact with Portuguese.” In Selected Proceedings on the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 14–25. Sommerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Carvalho, Ana M., and Ryan M. Bessett. 2015. “Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish in Contact with Portuguese.” In Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish: A Cross-Dialectal Perspective, 143–165.
Carvalho, Ana M., Rafael Orozco, & Naomi L. Shin. 2015. Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown University Press.
Cerrón-Palomino, Álvaro. 2014. “Ser más pro o menos pro: variación en la expresión de sujeto pronominal en el castellano limeño.” Lingüística 30 (1): 61–83.
. 2018. “Variable Subject Pronoun Expression in Andean Spanish: A Drift from the Acrolect.” Onomázein: Revista de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción de La Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, no. 42: 53–73.
. 2019. “Null-Subject Encounter: Variable Subject Pronoun Expression in the Spanish of Quechua-Spanish Bilinguals in the Central Peruvian Andes.” International Journal of Bilingualism 23 (5): 1005–23.
Cifuentes, Hugo. (1980). “Presencia y ausencia del pronombre personal sujeto en el habla culta de Santiago de Chile.” Boletín de Filología 31, no. 2: 743–752.
De Prada Pérez, Ana. 2015. “First Person Singular Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish in Contact With Catalan.” Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective, 121–142.
Enríquez Duque, Paola. 2021. “El ‘saber habitual’: una gramaticalización inducida por factores internos y externos en el español andino ecuatoriano.” Spanish in Context 18 (3):362–368.
Escobar, Anna María. 2016. “Dialectos del español de América: español andino.” En Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (coord.). Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica 21: 353–362.
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2004. “Spanish Subject Personal Pronoun Use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can We Rest the Case of English Contact?” Language Variation and Change 16 (1): 49–73.
. 2007. Los Mexicanos in New Jersey: Pronominal expression and ethnolinguistic aspects. In Selected Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (Vol. 9291, pp. 85–91). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
. 2009. “Are You Referring to Me? The Variable Use of UNO and YO in Oral Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (9): 1810–24.
Haboud, Marleen. 1998. Quichua y castellano en los Andes ecuatorianos: los efectos de un contacto prolongado. 1 ed. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala.
. 2005. “El gerundio de anterioridad entre bilingües quichua-castellano y monolingües hispanohablantes de la Sierra ecuatoriana.” UniverSOS 21: 9–38.
. 2018. “Perífrasis de gerundio y causatividad en el castellano andino ecuatoriano.” Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana 16, no. 2: 97–118.
Haboud, Marleen, and Esmeralda de la Vega. 2008. El español en América: Ecuador. In El español en America: Contactos lingusticos en Hispanoamerica, ed. by Azucena Palacios, chap. Ecuador, 161–187. Ariel Letras.
Lastra, Yolanda, and Pedro Martín Butragueño. 2015. “Subject Pronoun Expression in Oral Mexican Spanish.” Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective 39–57.
Limerick, Philip P. “First-person plural subject pronoun expression in Mexican Spanish spoken in Georgia.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14, no. 2 (2021): 411–432.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2015. “Subject pronoun expression in contact with Maya in Yucatan Spanish.” Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective: 101–119.
Manjón-Cabeza Cruz, Antonio, Francisca Pose Furest, and Francisco José Sánchez García. 2016. “Factores determinantes en la expresión del sujeto pronominal en el corpus PRESEEA de Granada.” Boletín de filología 51, no. 2: 181–207.
Martínez-Lara, José Alejandro. 2022. “Sujeto variable de 3ª persona singular en el habla de Montevideo.” Onomázein.
Morales, Amparo. 1980. “La expresión de sujeto pronominal, primera persona, en el español de Puerto Rico.” Boletín de la Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española 8, no. 2: 91–102.
Niño-Murcia, Mercedes. 1992. “El futuro sintético en el español norandino: caso de mandato atenuado.” Hispania 75 (3): 705–13.
Olbertz, Hella. 2008. “Dar + Gerund in Ecuadorian Highland Spanish: Contact-Induced Grammaticalization?” Spanish in Context 5 (1): 89–109.
Orozco, Rafael. 2015. “Pronominal Variation in Costeño Spanish.” In Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish: A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Edited by Ana M. Carvalho, Rafael Orozco and Naomi Lapidus Shin. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 17–37.
. 2018. Spanish in Colombia and New York City: Language Contact Meets Dialectal Convergence. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Edited by Ana M. Carvalho, Rafael Orozco, and Naomi Lapidus Shin. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 17–37.
Orozco, Rafael, and Gregory R. Guy. 2008. “El uso variable de los pronombres sujetos: ¿qué pasa en la costa Caribe colombiana?” In Selected Proceedings on the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 70–80. Sommerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Orozco, Rafael, and Luz Marcela Hurtado. 2021. “A Variationist Study of Subject Pronoun Expression in Medellín, Colombia.” Languages 6 (1): 5.
Otheguy, Ricardo, and Ana Celia Zentella. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialectal Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ana Celia Zentella, and David Livert. 2007. “Language and Dialect Contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the Formation of a Speech Community.” Language 83 (4): 770–802.
Padilla, Lillie. 2021. “First person singular subject pronoun expression in Equatoguinean Spanish.” Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 3, no. 2: 171–194.
Palacios, Azucena, and Marleen Haboud. 2018. “Dejar + gerundio en el castellano andino ecuatoriano.” Migración y contacto de lenguas en la Romania del siglo XXI. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Posio, Pekka. 2012. “Who Are ‘We’ in Spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and Reference of First Person Plural Subject Pronouns.” Language Sciences 34 (3): 339–60.
Quilis, Antonio. 1992. Rasgos generales sobre la lengua española en el Ecuador. In César Hernandez Alonso (ed.), Historia y presente del español de américa, 593–606. Pabecal.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Repede, Doina. 2019. “Condicionantes sociolingüísticos en la expresión del sujeto pronominal en el corpus PRESEEA-Sevilla: el sociolecto alto.” Revista de Investigación Lingüística 221: 397–423.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso, and Eider Etxebarria-Zuluaga. In press. “Variationist Typology; assessing convergence between Basque and Spanish subject pronoun expression.” Lapurdum.
Shin, Naomi Lapidus. 2014. “Grammatical Complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg Pronoun Expression and Verbal Ambiguity.” Language Variation and Change 26 (3): 303–30.
Shin, Naomi Lapidus, and Cecilia Montes-Alcalá. 2014. “El uso contextual del pronombre sujeto como factor predictivo de la influencia del inglés en el español de Nueva York [English influence on Spanish in New York: Evidence from subject pronouns in context].” Sociolinguistic Studies 8 (1): 85–110.
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford University Press.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Catherine E. Travis. 2010. “Variable Yo Expression In New Mexico: English Influence?” Spanish of the U.S. Southwest, 185–206.
. 2011. Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), pp. 241–267.
. 2014. “Prosody, Priming and Particular Constructions: The Patterning of English First-Person Singular Subject Expression in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 631: 19–34.
. 2018. Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge University Press.
Travis, Catherine. 2005. “The Yo-Yo Effect Priming in Subject Expression in Colombian Spanish.” In Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Salt Lake City, March 2004, ed. by Randall Gess and Edward J. Rubin. Vol. 2721. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
