Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 18:2 (2021) ► pp.218–236
Vos and tú in the linguistic landscape
Attitudes toward their use in Medellín, Colombia
Published online: 8 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.18022.wey
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.18022.wey
Abstract
Although vos is common in speech in Medellín, it is considered non-prestigious for writing (Agudelo Montoya, Claudia Liliana, Gladys Yolanda Pasuy Guerrero, Octavio Escobar Giraldo, and José Fernando Ramírez Osorio. 2016. “Actitudes
lingüísticas de los profesores de lenguas de la Universidad de Caldas respecto al
voseo.” Revista de Investigaciones
UCM 16 (27): 16–28. ). Nonetheless, vos is an important marker of
local identity (. 2013. “Voseo medellinense como
expresión de identidad
paisa.” Íkala 18 (1): 61–81.) that increasingly appears in writing ( 2016a. “Making the Case for Increased
Prestige of the Vernacular: Medellín’s
Voseo.” In Forms of Address in the Spanish-Speaking
World, ed. by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera, 287–302. New York: John Benjamins. ). Its presence suggests a potential upward shift in its prestige. For that to happen,
favorable attitudes toward its use in writing are called for. Here we examine the linguistic attitudes of 222
medellinenses toward vos, tú, and their corresponding verb forms in
advertising. We find that (1) all speakers prefer vos; (2) they favor the pronoun vos over its
corresponding verb forms; (3) younger speakers prefer vos over their older counterparts; and (4) men prefer
voseo verb forms while women prefer tuteo forms. Given the overall positive attitudes toward
vos, it is possible that its prestige will increase.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Forms of address in Medellín
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results and discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (24)
Agudelo Montoya, Claudia Liliana, Gladys Yolanda Pasuy Guerrero, Octavio Escobar Giraldo, and José Fernando Ramírez Osorio. 2016. “Actitudes
lingüísticas de los profesores de lenguas de la Universidad de Caldas respecto al
voseo.” Revista de Investigaciones
UCM 16 (27): 16–28.
Bursik, Bronislav. 2008. Las
formas de tratamiento en la publicidad periodística de hoy de hace 25 años.” (Unpublished MA
thesis). Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. [URL]
Flórez, Luis. 1957. Habla
y cultura popular en Antioquia: Materiales para un
estudio. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
Gordon, Elizabeth. 1997. “Sex,
Speech, and Stereotypes: Why Women Use Prestige Speech Forms More Than Men.” Language in
Society 26 (1): 47–63.
Jang, Ji Son. 2010. “Fórmulas de tratamiento
pronominales en los jóvenes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia) desde la óptica socio-pragmática: Estrato socioeconómico y
sexo.” Íkala 15 (26): 43–116.
. 2012. “La dinámica de la alternancia
entre tú, vos y usted en Medellín (Colombia) desde la teoría de la acomodación
comunicativa.” Forma y
Función 25 (1): 129–144.
. 2015. “Frecuencia del tú en tres
zonas del departamento de Antioquia (Colombia): influencia de la zona urbana/rural.” Forma y
Función 28 (1): 11–29.
Millán, Mónica. 2014. “Vos
sos paisa: A Study of Address Forms in Medellín, Colombia.” In New
Directions in Hispanic Linguistics, ed. by Rafael Orozco, 92–111. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Penny, Ralph. 2000. A
History of the Spanish Language, 2nd
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quintanilla Aguilar, José Roberto Alexander, and Pablo Rodríguez Prieto. 2014. “El
voseo en la publicidad de Costa Rica: Un análisis de las actitudes de los hablantes.” Revista
Internacional de Lingüística
Iberoamericana 12 (1): 109–119.
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1989. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Urban Land Institute. 2013. “City of
the Year.” [URL]
Villa Mejía, Víctor. 2010. “La
solidaridad y poder del vos antioqueño.” Lingüística y
Literatura 581: 69–85.
Weyers, Joseph R. 2011. “Tú and Usted in Mexican
Advertising: The Politeness Systems of Written Public Discourse.” Southwest Journal of
Linguistics 30 (1): 117–133.
2016a. “Making the Case for Increased
Prestige of the Vernacular: Medellín’s
Voseo.” In Forms of Address in the Spanish-Speaking
World, ed. by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera, 287–302. New York: John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Liebscher, Grit, Cole Sutherland & Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain
2025. Functions of address in the German linguistic landscape. In Beyond Binaries in Address Research [Topics in Address Research, 6], ► pp. 119 ff.
Mazzaro, Natalia & Raquel González de Anda
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
