Cover not available

Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 13:2 (2016) ► pp.285–307

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Can speakers’ virtual lexical richness be calculated?

Individual and social determining factors

Published online: 15 September 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.2.06avi
The aim of this paper is to show an original method of calculating individual lexical richness. This method leads to a non-linear optimization. A randomized algorithm, Simulated Annealing, is used in order to carry out the optimization. This procedure has allowed us to represent a function from which we obtain a reliable pattern for lexical estimation. Furthermore, this method is compatible with other traditional procedures used for the estimation of lexical richness. Therefore, in this work we have taken an alternative and more general approach: we wish to calculate the virtual richness of the individual’s vocabulary. In order to validate the new model that calculates lexical richness, we carried out a pilot study based on the subjects’ sociolinguistic patterns that govern their lexical richness. We have explored the lexical variation of the Spanish system that occurs during the oral exchanges of 86 speakers born in Malaga.
References (28)
Ávila, Raúl. 1985. “La langue espagnole et son enseignement. Oppresseurs et oprimes.” In La crise des langues, ed. by Jacques Maurais, 342ff. Québec-París: Conseil de la Langue Française.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “Lengua hablada y estrato social. Un acercamiento lexicoestadístico.” NRFH XXXVI/11: 131–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldi, Pierre Luigi. 1971. “Fattori sociali dell’abilitá lingüística nella produzione scrita di bambini di novidieci anni.” SILTA 11: 335–471.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bod, Rens. 1995. Enriching Linguistics with Statistics. Performance Models of Natural Language. Amsterdam: ILLC Disertation Series, Amsterdam University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1957. Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. London-New York: Tavistock-Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta and David Sankoff. 1974. “Variable Rules. Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence.” Language 501: 333–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charniak, Eugene. 1993. Statistical Language Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre. 1959. Problèmes et méthodes de la statisque linguistique. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott. 2002. “Short Texts, Best Fitting Curves, and New Measures of Lexical Diversity.” Language Testing 191: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: CAL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. “Contraction, Deletion and Inherent Variability of the English Copula.” Language 451: 715–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Field Methods of the Project of Linguistic Change and Variation.” In Language in Use. Readings in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Baugh and Joel Sherzer, 28–53. New Jersey: Prentice‑Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Morales, Humberto (coord.) 1983. Introducción a la lingüística actual. Madrid: Playor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malvern, David and Brian Richards. 2000. “Investigating Accommodation in Language Proficiency in Interviews Using a New Measure of Lexical Diversity.” Language Testing 191: 85–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malvern, David, Brian Richards, Ngoni Chipere, and Pilar Durán. 2004. Lexical Diversity and Language Development: Quantification and Assessment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metropolis, Nicholas, et al. 1953. “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 211: 1087–1092. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1979. Function and Process in a Variable Phonology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rousseau, Pascale and David Sankoff. 1989. “Statistical Evidence for Rule Ordering.” Language Variation and Change 1(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez Sáez, José María. 1994. El algoritmo Simulated Annealing. Doctoral dissertation. Malaga University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. 1978. Linguistic Variation. Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gijsel, Sofie, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2006. “Locating Lexical Richness: A Corpus Linguistic, Sociovariational Analysis.” 8es Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles. Accessed February 19, 2014. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermeer, Anne. 2004. “The Relation between Lexical Richness and Vocabulary Size in Dutch L1 and L2 Children.” In Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition and Testing, ed. by Paul Bogaards and Baita Laufer, 173–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villena Ponsoda, Juan Andrés. 1994a. La ciudad lingüística. Fundamentos críticos de la sociolingüística urbana. Granada: Granada University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994b. “Pautas y procedimientos de representación del corpus oral español de la Universidad de Málaga. Informe preliminar.” In Estudios para un corpus del español, ed. by Manuel Alvar Ezquerra and Juan Andrés Villena Ponsoda, 73–10. Málaga: Malaga University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Proyecto de investigación de las variedades vernáculas de la ciudad de Málaga. Objetivos, métodos y primeros resultados. Final report for the DGICYT PB 91‑0417, 1992-1995. Málaga: Malaga University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Frederick (ed.) 1973. Language and Poverty. Chicago: McNally.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zareva, Alla, Paula Schwanenflugel, and Yordanka Nikolova. 2005. “Relationship between Lexical Competence and Language Proficiency-Variable Sensitivity.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 271: 567–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ávila-Muñoz, Antonio M. & Marta Sánchez-Saus Laserna
2025. Word Associations and Semantic Relationships in the Lexical Availability of Learners of Spanish as a Foreign Language. In Lexicon Exploration in English and Spanish Learners [Educational Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Ávila-Muñoz, Antonio Manuel
2024. Spanish Students’ Categorical Perceptions of Feminist Movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue