Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 13:2 (2016) ► pp.212–236
Remembering and noticing
A conversation-analytic study of ‘ah’ in Mexican Spanish talk
Published online: 15 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.2.03vaz
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.2.03vaz
The present investigation uses the methodology of Conversation Analysis to study the particle ah in Mexican Spanish interactions. It looks at ah as a change-of-state token in remembering and noticing sequences. Similar to previous studies (e.g., Edwards and Middleton 1986; Goodwin 1987; and Drew 1989), this investigation aims to show how cognitive processes are socially organised in interaction. Three types of remembering sequences are identified and described: assisted, metacognitive, and spontaneous remembering. It is suggested that in these type of sequences, ah marks the end of the cognitive process which is completed either with external help or with metacognitive strategies. In noticing formulations, ah marks the realisation of something, it prefaces a noticing formulation which may work as a topic initiator or it may initiate the closing of a sequence. A noticing formulation may also work as an account of action.
Keywords: ah, particles, interjections, noticing, remembering, Spanish interactions
References (26)
Alonso-Cortés, A. 1999. “Las construcciones exclamativas. La interjección y las expresiones vocativas.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 31, ed. by I. Bosque and V. Demonte, 3993–4051. Madrid: Espasa.
Drew, Paul. 1989. “Recalling Someone from the Past.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by D. Roger and P. Bull, 96–115. Exeter: Intercommunications.
Edeso Natalías, Verónica. 2009. Contribución al uso de la interjección en español. Bern: Peter Lang.
Edwards, Derek, and David J. Middleton. 1986. “Joint Remembering: Constructing an Account of Shared Experience through Conversational Discourse.” Discourse Processes 9 (4): 423–459.
. 1988. “Conversational Remembering and Family Relationships: How Children Learn to Remember.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 51: 3–25.
Goodwin, Charles. 1987. “Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 115–31.
Harvey, Sacks, Emanuel. A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”. Language, 501: 696–735.
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Actions, ed. by J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press.
. 2002. “
Oh-prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 1993. “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 1–30.
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“Oh That’s Right”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 277–297.
Martín Zorraquillo, M.A., and Lázaro Portolés. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 31, ed. by I. Bosque and V. Demonte, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa.
Middleton, David J., and Derek Edwards. 1990. “Conversational Remembering: A Social Psychological Approach.” In Collective Remembering, ed. by D. Middleton and D. Edwards, 23–46. London: Sage.
Real Academia Española (RAE). 2001. Diccionario de la lengua española, Vigésimo segunda edición. Accessed 28 June 2013. [URL].
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II1, ed. by G. Jefferson, with an introduction by E. Schegloff. Cornwall: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-taking Organization.” In Talk and Social Orgnization, ed. by G. Button and J.R. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Prime in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vázquez Carranza, A. 2012. “
O sea in Talk: A Study of Mexican Spanish Interactions.” Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics 131: 158–188.
. 2013. “Responding and Clarifying: An Analysis of pues as a Sequential Marker in Mexican Spanish Talk-in-interactions.” Spanish in Context 10 (2): 284–309.
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel. Forthcoming. “Aceptación y resistencia: un análisis de ‘ah’ y ‘ay’ como indicadores de cambio de estado”. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México.
Vázquez Carranza, A. 2015. “Análisis conversacional de ‘a poco’ en el habla cotidiana.” Coloquio Rumbos de la Lingüística V, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, México DF. Accessed 24 April 2015. [URL].
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Inbar, Anna
Pardo Llibrer, Adrià
2025. From vocative contexts to digressive uses. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 190 ff.
Sbertoli-Nielsen, Paul
2025. Multimodally aligning with projected continuation in Peninsular Spanish. Interactional Linguistics
Wu, Yaxin, Ying Hu & Elliott M. Hoey
Carranza, Ariel Vázquez
2022. Ritualized disbelief in Mexican Spanish talk-in-interaction. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 481 ff.
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel
Raymond, Chase Wesley
Waring, Hansun Zhang
Pascual Escagedo, Consuelo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.