Cover not available

Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 16:2 (2019) ► pp.151172

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (35)
Referencias
Anscombre, Jean Claude y Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2003. “Le recouvrement de la syntaxe et de la macro-syntaxe.” En Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral, ed. por Antonietta Scarano, 53–75. Roma: Bulzoni Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenes, Ester. 2017. “La reserva argumentativa. Análisis pragmalingüístico de sus correlatos sintácticos.” Pragmalingüística 251: 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia y Leslie Arnovick. 2010. “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation.” En Historical Pragmatics, ed. por Andreas Jucker e Irma Taavitsainen, 165–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions.” Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar II. Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaetane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. “Opérateurs argumentatives et visée argumentative.” Cahiers de linguistique française 51: 7–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nichols. 2007. “Insubordination and its Uses.” En Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. por Irina Nikolaeva, 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Insubordination and the Grammaticalisation of Interactive Presuppositions.” Ponencia presentada en el Congreso “Methodologies in determining Morphosyntactic Change”. Osaka: Museum of Ethnography.
Evans, Nichols y Honoré Watanabe. 2016. “The Dynamics of Insubordination. An Overview.” En Insubordination, ed. por Nichols Evans y Honoré Watanabe, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. “Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry 6 (3): 353–375.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2003. “Operador/conector, un criterio para la sintaxis discursiva.” Rilce 19 (1): 61–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Hacia una sintaxis del enunciado.” LEA 17 (1): 33–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “ Eso sí y la reinterpretación enunciativa.” Oralia 91: 305–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sintaxis del enunciado: los complementos periféricos. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “El margen derecho del enunciado.” RSEL 42 (2): 63–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Comment Clauses and the Emergence of New Discourse Markers: Spanish lo que es más .” Journal of Pragmatics 61 (1): 103–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Operadores de comentario y argumentación. Spanish in Context 12 (1): 56–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Nuevos retos en sintaxis del discurso.” En Jóvenes aportaciones a la investigación lingüística, coord. por Cristóbal J. Álvarez López, Blanca Garrido Martín y Marina González Sanz, 35–56. Sevilla: Alfar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Operadores discursivos: Focalización, modalidad e intersubjetividad.” En El español a través del tiempo: estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano, coord. por Araceli López Serena, Antonio Narbona Jiménez, Santiago del Rey Quesada, 77–899. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. “Los marcadores de límite escalar: argumentación y “vaguedad” enunciativa.” Rilce 32 (1): 110–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016c. “ Para colmo, Scalar Operator and Additive Connector. Keys to an Evolving Process.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1): 79–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [2000] 2017a. Lingüística pragmática y análisis del discurso. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Macrosintaxis y lingüística pragmática.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (CLAC) 711: 5–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina y Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara. 2002. Mecanismos lingüísticos de la persuasión. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1997. “La determinación de los niveles oracionales”. En La oración y sus funciones, ed. por Salvador Gutiérrez Ordóñez, 368–426. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, Vincenzo. 1998. Gramática de la argumentación. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María y José Portolés. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso.” En Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. por Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norén, Coco. 2012. “Increasing Argumentative Force in Parliamentary Debate. The Example of surtout (‘above all’).” En Parliamentary Discourses across Cultures: Interdisciplinary Approaches, ed. por Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, 91–104. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. 2016. “Independent si-Clauses in Spanish”. En Insubordination, ed. por Nichols Evans y Honoré Watanabe, 89–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of the argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
2021. A cross-linguistic look at the right periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325],  pp. 415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue