Cover not available

Article published In: Spanish in Context
Vol. 15:1 (2018) ► pp.103–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Análisis cognitivo-discursivo y situacional de las formas de tratamiento en función de sujeto y de objeto en español

 | Universidad de La Laguna

Article language: Spanish

Published online: 31 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00005.ser
Abstracto
Las formas de sujeto y de objeto de segunda persona singular tú/usted y te/a ti; le, lo, la /a usted son recursos que posee la lengua española para indexar a los participantes en las distintas situaciones discursivas. Pocos estudios han profundizado en los valores cognitivos que subyacen a esta elección y, de forma general, se prefiere seguir aludiendo al eje de solidaridad-poder para su explicación. Para ello se suele recurrir a un conjunto de factores meramente descriptivos (edad, distancia social, respeto, etc.). Este trabajo pretende contribuir al desarrollo del conocimiento de estos pronombres desde una perspectiva discursivo-cognitiva y situacional, que, además presenta como novedad la distinción entre las funciones de sujeto pronominal y objeto de persona. Para ello se realizará un análisis cognitivo-discursivo basado en la prominencia de los referentes de estas formas en distintos géneros y situaciones comunicativas y entre hablantes de distintas afiliaciones socioprofesionales. Se utilizarán textos del Corpus Conversacional del Español de Canarias (CCEC).
Article outline
  • 1.La segunda persona del singular como recurso de tratamiento interpersonal
  • 2.La variación de la segunda persona del singular en función de objeto
    • 2.1Valores cognitivo-discursivos de la variación de la segunda persona del singular
    • 2.2Variantes de la segunda persona del singular en función de objeto
  • 3.Metodología y corpus
  • 4.La variación de la segunda persona del singular
  • 5.El significado discursivo-cognitivo de las variantes de la segunda persona del singular
  • 6.Conclusiones
  • Reconocimiento
  • Notas
  • Referencias
References (39)
Referencias
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel. 2006. Variación morfosintáctica e interacción social: Análisis del paradigma de los clíticos verbales españoles en los medios de comunicación. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “The participants as objects: Variation and meaning of first- and second-person objects in Spanish”. Studia Linguistica 71 (2): 1–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel y María José Serrano. 2010. “The cognitive bases of linguistic style”. Sociolinguistic Studies 41: 115–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun Subjects. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ardehali, Paula Elizabeth. 1990. “Pronoun exchange as a barometer of social change”. Dialectal Anthropology 151: 82–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Accessibility theory: An overview”. En Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord y Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 29–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis. 2000. “Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political electoral debate”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Sociolingüística del español. Desarrollos y perspectivas en el estudio de la lengua española en contexto social. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. En Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge: Massachussets University Press, 253–276.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick y Dominique Maingueneau. 2005. Diccionario de análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William y Allan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Miguel, José Miguel. 2015. “Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach”. Folia Linguistica 491: 205–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction-grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. K., Hedberg, Nancy y Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 691: 274–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. “Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms”. En Dik Bakker y Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 197–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2010. “Reflexiones metodológicas y teóricas sobre el estudio de las formas de tratamiento en el mundo hispanoablante, a partir de una investigación en Santiago de Chile”. En Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. México: El Colegio de México, pp. 103–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, Martha B.. 1981. “Toward a semantic approach to terms of address. A critique of deterministic models in Sociolinguistics”. Language in Communication 1 (2–3): 237–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat Orecchioni, Catherine. 1992. Les interactions verbales. París: A ColinGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martiny, Thierry. 1996. “Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach”. Language Sciences 18 (3–4): 765–775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medina López, Javier. 2009. “El tú del presidente. La ruptura del rol social”. Revista Española de Lingüística 39 (1): 77–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2011. “The accountability interview, politics and change in the UK public service broadcasting”. En Mats Ekström y Marianna Patrona (Eds.), Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 33–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter y Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NGRAE: Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G.. 1997. “Language and politics: indirectness in political discourse”. Discourse and Society 8 (1): 49–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto. 2016. “Discourse, cognition and society”. En Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto (eds.) Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, María José. 2001. “La deixis social en los usos pronominales de cortesía en español”. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 9–101: 265–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “La variación sintáctica”. En Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica. Londres: Routledge, pp. 809–821.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 30 (1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2014. Person. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2006. “Image building through modality: The case of political interviews”. Discourse and Society 7(3): 389–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 1996. “Reconsidering power and distance”. Journal of Pragmatics 261:1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, Miranda. 2003. “‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular pronoun tú”. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 191–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard, Sachiko, Ide y Konrad Ehrlich. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and politic behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality”. En Richard Watts et al. (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Pollock, Matthew
2024. Politics, variation, and politeness on Andalusian Twitter (X). In Recent developments in Hispanic linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 41], ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Pontes, Valdecy Oliveira & José Victor Melo de Lima
2024. Uma análise cognitivo-funcional do uso de tú e usted no espanhol oral de Valência. Domínios de Lingu at gem 18 ► pp. e1817 ff. DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2021. Gradual objectivity. Variation in the use of the objectivizing second-person singular tú in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 176 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2022. Desubjectivizing discourse through the use of the periphrasis haber que + infinitive in Spanish. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 17 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018. Not just you: The construction of radio audiences through second-person choice in Peninsular Spanish. Language & Communication 60 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2025. “No se puede ser más tonto”. In Beyond Binaries in Address Research [Topics in Address Research, 6], ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Á.
2019. La elección de segunda persona y la construcción de identidades contextuales en el discurso radiofónico de una comunidad peninsular . Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue