Cover not available

In:L3 Development After the Initial State
Edited by Megan M. Brown-Bousfield, Suzanne Flynn and Éva Fernández-Berkes
[Studies in Bilingualism 65] 2023
► pp. 96–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

L3 prosody

Cross-linguistic influence of prosodic features in Mandarin and English by Cantonese multilinguals

 | City University of Hong Kong
 | The Education University of Hong Kong
 | The Education University of Hong Kong
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.65.05han
Abstract
The direction of cross-linguistic influence (CLI) of phonological features among L1, L2, and L3 of a multilingual depends indispensably on the proficiency levels of the L2 and the L3. Cantonese speakers in Guangdong Province have Mandarin as an L2 and English as an L3, while Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong have English as an L2 and Mandarin as an L3. This study aims to examine the CLI of Cantonese multilinguals’ Mandarin pitch span and the existence of the neutral tone on the pitch of stressed syllables and the duration of unstressed syllables in their English utterances. The study analyzed English and Mandarin speech data collected from 18 Cantonese multilinguals from Hong Kong and Guangdong Province. The results revealed progressive and regressive phonological CLI across the three languages spoken by the Cantonese multilinguals with different L2 and L3 proficiency levels.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Cantonese, Mandarin, and English prosody
    • 2.2Studies of prosody acquisition
    • 2.3Directionality of cross-linguistic influence
  • 3.Hypothesis and research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Procedure
    • 4.3Pitch analysis
    • 4.4Duration analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Pitch
    • 5.2Duration
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Influence of pitch span
    • 6.2Influence from pitch span to pitch level
    • 6.3Influence of syllable duration ratio
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
References (48)
References
Altenberg, E. P., & Ferrand, C. T. (2006). Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English/Russian, and bilingual English/Cantonese young adult women. Journal of Voice, 20(1), 89–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.2). Universty of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolton, K. (2011). Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 51–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown-Bousfield, M. M., & Chang, C. B. (2023). Regressive cross-linguistic influence in multilingual speech rhythm: the role of language similarity. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3 development after the initial state (pp. 49–71). John Benjamins. (this volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli, J. (2012). L3 phonology: An understudied domain. In J. Cabrelli, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017). Testing the phonological permeability hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Amaro, J. F., & Rothman, J. (2015). The relationship between L3 transfer and structural similarity across development. Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, 4, 21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 275–296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C. (2005). The acquisition of American English rhythm by Taiwanese EFL learners. English Teaching and Learning, 29, 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Han, Q. W. (2019). L3 phonology: Contributions of L1 and L2 to L3 pronunciation learning by Hong Kong speakers. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 492–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Tian, J. X. (2021). The roles of Cantonese speakers’ L1 and L2 phonological features in L3 pronunciation acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Wang, Q. (2016). The effects of Chinese learners’ English acoustic-prosodic patterns on listeners’ attitudinal judgments. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(2), 91–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, S. H. (2005). The effects of tones on speaking frequency and intensity ranges in Mandarin and Min dialects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(5), 3225–3230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Robb, M. P., Gilbert, H. R., & Lerman, J. W. (2001). A study of sentence stress production in Mandarin speakers of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(4), 1681–1690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, C. C. (2011). A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, R. F. (1990). Contemporary phonological theories and Chinese phonology. The World of Chinese Studies, 5, 58–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, R. E. (2010). Speech rhythm: The language-specific integration of pitch and duration (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.
Deterding, D. (2006). The North Wind versus a Wolf: Short texts for the description and measurement of English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36(2), 187–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Earle, Michael A. (1975). An acoustic phonetic study of northern Vietnamese tones. Santa Barbara CA: Speech Communications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E. M. (2015). A sonority-based account of speech rhythm in Chinese learners of English. In M. Gut, R. Fuchs, & E. M. Wunder (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp. 165–184). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, M. L. & Gallardo del Puerto, F. (2003). English FL sounds in school learners of different ages. In M. del P. García Mayo & M. L. García Lecumberri (Eds.) Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 115–135). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1989). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B., & Hammarberg, B. (2005). Re-setting the basis of articulation in the acquisition of new languages: A third-language case study. In B. Hufeisen & R. Fouser (Eds.), Introductory readings in L3 (pp. 11–18). Stauffenberg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hincks, R. & Edlund, J. (2009). Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 32–50Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hung, T. (2012). Hong Kong English. In E. L. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy and language in use (pp. 113–133). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keating, P., & Kuo, G. (2012). Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 1050–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llama, R., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Revisiting (non-) native influence in VOT production: Insights from advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, E. L. (2017). Suprasegmental aspects of pronunciation in New Englishes. In O. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation (pp. 527–541). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2013). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mok, P. (2009). On the syllable-timing of Cantonese and Beijing Mandarin. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 2, 148–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mok, P., & Dellwo, V. (2008). Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. In Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody (2008) (pp. 423–426).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, M. (1990). On the rhythm parameter in phonology. in I. M. Roca (Ed.), Logical issues in language acquisition (pp. 157–175). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1945). The intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plato, L. (1926). The laws (Loeb Classical Library, pp. 187–192). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied linguistics, 15(1), 36–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sypiańska, J. (2016). Multilingual acquisition of vowels in L1 Polish, L2 Danish and L3 English, International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 476–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, L., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2013). Trilingual education in Hong Kong primary schools: A case study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 100–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, L., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2008). Language attitudes and gender in China: Perceptions and reported use of Putonghua and Cantonese in the southern province of Guangdong. Language Awareness, 17(1), 57–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2010). L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 75–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, R., Ao, R., & Low, E. L. (2021). Features of Chinese English. In E. L. Low & A. Pakir (Eds.), Introductory readings in L3 English in East and South Asia: Policy, Features and Language in Use (pp. 107–121). Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Nissen, S. L. & Francis, A. L. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498–4513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Brown-Bousfield, Megan M. & Charles B. Chang
2023. Regressive cross-linguistic influence in multilingual speech rhythm. In L3 Development After the Initial State [Studies in Bilingualism, 65], ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue