Cover not available

In:L3 Development After the Initial State
Edited by Megan M. Brown-Bousfield, Suzanne Flynn and Éva Fernández-Berkes
[Studies in Bilingualism 65] 2023
► pp. 76–95

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Comparing two notions of transfer in third language phonological acquisition

A reanalysis of three studies

 | University of Victoria
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.65.04des
Abstract
In third language acquisition (L3A) research on cross-linguistic influence, much of the emphasis of the existing acquisition models has been on the transfer of morphosyntactic features, leaving phonology understudied. This chapter seeks to assess the empirical adequacy of two competing hypotheses of transfer and establish their potential value for future L3 phonology research: Full Transfer (FT) and Full Transfer Potential (FTP). I review previous L3 phonological studies and examine how FT and FTP could explain the data patterns. My analyses suggest that FTP provides greater empirical coverage and more explanatory potential than FT. Though better in accounting for sources of L3 phonological transfer post facto and beyond the initial stage, FTP may be limited concerning its core idea that “anything may transfer” (Westergaard, 2019).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical overview
    • 2.1Defining ‘transfer’
    • 2.2Transfer in L3A research
    • 2.3The FT model
    • 2.4Defining FT in L3A
    • 2.5An alternative hypothesis to FT: FTP
  • 3.L3 phonology production and perception studies
    • 3.1Chen and Han (2019): L1 and L2 influence on L3 Mandarin pronunciation
    • 3.2Llama et al. (2010), Llama and Cardoso (2018): L3 Spanish VOT
    • 3.3Chan and Chang (2019): Perception of L3 Yoruba/Thai tonal contrasts
  • 4.FT or FTP: Which provides a better account?
    • 4.1Chen and Han (2019)
    • 4.2Llama et al. (2010) and Llama and Cardoso (2018)
    • 4.3Chan and Chang (2019)
    • 4.4Wholesale (FT) or Property-by-property transfer (FTP)?
    • 4.5Scope: Initial state or beyond?
    • 4.6FTP: Potential limitations
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (45)
References
Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J. (2017). Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angelis, G. D., & Selinker, L. (2001). Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems in the multilingual mind. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 42–58). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (2021). Turtles all the way down: Micro-cues and piecemeal transfer in L3 phonology. Commentary on Westergaard (2020) “Microvariation in multilingual situations: the importance of property-by-property acquisition”. Second Language Research 37(3), 415–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Segmental and prosodic evidence for property-by-property phonological transfer in L3 English in Northern Africa. Languages, 7(1), 28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berkes, E., & Flynn, S. (2012). Further evidence in support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model. In J. Cabrelli, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli, J. (2012). L3 phonology: An understudied domain. In J. Cabrelli, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, I. L., & Chang, C. B. (2019). Perception of nonnative tonal contrasts by Mandarin-English and English-Mandarin sequential bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(2), 956–972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Han, Q. W. (2019). L3 phonology: Contributions of L1 and L2 to L3 pronunciation learning by Hong Kong speakers. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 492–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daland, R., & Norrmann-Vigil, I. (2015). Toward a generative theory of language transfer: Experiment and modeling of sC prothesis in L2 Spanish. Open Linguistics, 1(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, E. (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(4), 677–714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Berkes, E., & Flynn, S. (2023). Grammatical mapping in L3 acquisition: A theory of development. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3 development after the initial state (pp. 28–48). John Benjamins. (this volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, S. (2009). UG and L3 acquisition: New insights and more questions. In Y. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp. 71–88). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). Avoiding the cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy: Comments and questions regarding Full Transfer Potential. Second Language Research, 37(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2021). You know more than you say: Methodological choices in L3 transfer research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 54–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Born to parse: How children select their languages. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C. (2023). Lexical development in a third language. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3 development after the initial state (pp. 152–170). John Benjamins. (this volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llama, R., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Revisiting (non-)native influence in VOT production: Insights from advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, S. (2003). Second language transfer during third language acquisition. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 3(2), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, C., Krzysik, I., Lewandowska, H., & Wrembel, M. (2021). Multilingual learners’ perceptions of cross-linguistic distances: a proposal for a visual psychotypological measure. Language Awareness, 30(2), 176–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortin, R., & Fernandez-Florez, C. (2019). Transfer of variable grammars in third language acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 442–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö. (2016). The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Universal Grammar and second language phonology: Full transfer / prevalent access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish “stress” by English and French speakers. Language Acquisition, 25(3), 231–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., & Marsden, H. (2018). Polarity-item anything in L3 English: Where does transfer come from when the L1 is Catalan and the L2 is Spanish? Second Language Research, 34(4), 487–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition. In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, L. Meroni, & M. Pinto (Ed.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from “Going Romance” Utrecht 2011 (pp. 217–247). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021a). Making models, making predictions. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 116–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021b). In defense of ‘copying and restructuring.’ Second Language Research, 37(3), 489–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). A shared linguistic system of multilingual representations. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3 development after the initial state (pp. 29–48). John Benjamins. (this volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. (2019). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021b). L3 acquisition and crosslinguistic influence as co-activation: Response to commentaries on the keynote ‘Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition.’ Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2020). Cross-linguistic interactions in third language acquisition: Evidence from multi-feature analysis of speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue