In:Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 153–182
Chapter 5VanPatten (1990)’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.62.05san
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.62.05san
Abstract
VanPatten’s (1990) investigation of attention to form and meaning during input processing remains among the most cited and replicated studies in second language research. Early replications (Barcroft, 2001; Greenslade, Bouden, & Sanz, 1999; Wong, 2001) kept materials intact, changing modality or language, yielding comparable results. Later replications operationalized comprehension differently, changing text and assessment, and concluded even low proficiency learners can consciously process form, regardless of salience or meaning, without detriment to comprehension (Leow, Hsieh, & Moreno, 2008; Morgan-Short, Heil, Botero-Moriarty, & Ebert, 2012; Morgan-Short et al., 2018). This chapter compares these texts and assessments. Results suggest the new assessment obscures differences between proficiencies and modalities, and the new, more complex text hides task effects identified in the original strand.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The initial study
- The replication agenda and the replication crisis in SLA
- The replication agenda: Replication round 1
- The replication agenda: Replication round 2
- The current study
- Methodology
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Analysis and results
- Coding
- Quantitative analyses
- Discussion
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (30)
Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128, 466–478.
Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Green, D. W., Hernandez, M., Scifo, P., Keim, R., … Costa, A. (2012). Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2076–2086.
Barcroft, J. (2001). Attention to form and meaning in the written mode: Unconstrained and constrained reading. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 95–127.
Bowles, M. A. (2010). Concurrent verbal reports in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 111–127.
Bush, M. (2015). Reducing the need for guesswork in multiple-choice tests. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 218–231.
Carrell, P. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727–752.
Cortina, J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
Greenslade, T., Bouden, L., & Sanz, C. (1999). Attending to form and content in processing L2 reading texts. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 65–90.
Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning, 56, 279–304.
Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271–299.
Leow, R. P., Hsieh, H., & Moreno, N. (2008). Attention to form and meaning revisited. Language Learning, 58, 665–695.
Luijendijk, H., & Koolman, X. (2012). The incentive to publish negative studies: How beta-blockers and depression got stuck in the publication cycle. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 488–492.
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68, 321–391.
Morgan-Short, K., Heil, J., Botero-Moriarty, A., & Ebert, S. (2012). Allocation of attention to second language form and meaning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 659–685.
Morgan-Short, K., Marsden, E., Heil, J., Issa, B., Leow, R., Mikhaylova, A., … Szudarski, P. (2018). Multi-site replication in second language acquisition research: Attention to form during listening and reading comprehension. Language Learning, 68, 392–437.
Morgan-Short, K., Marsden, E., Heil, J., Leow, R. P., Mikhaylova, A., Mikołajczak, S., … Slabakova, R. (2016, September). Attention to form and second language comprehension: A multi- site replication and extension. Paper presented at the 35th Second Language Research Forum, New York, NY.
Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499–508.
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rangel Montemayos, I. E. (1999, December 9). Los Aztecas II. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Sanz, C. (2005). Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sanz, C., Lin, H-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59, 33–71.
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 607–646.
Taber, K. (2016). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.
VanPatten, B. (1989). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania, 72, 409–416.
(1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Marsden, Emma & Kara Morgan‐Short
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
