Cover not available

In:Lost in Transmission: The role of attrition and input in heritage language development
Edited by Bernhard Brehmer and Jeanine Treffers-Daller
[Studies in Bilingualism 59] 2020
► pp. 15–32

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Definiteness in Wenzhounese Chinese in the Netherlands and in China

Evidence for generational change in two locations

 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 29 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.59.01aal
Abstract
By comparing two generations of speakers in China and the Netherlands, we investigated whether Wenzhounese Chinese as spoken by heritage speakers in the Netherlands might be subject to change due to its contact with the Dutch language. To this end, we considered how nouns referring to already mentioned referents were encoded, hypothesizing an increase in overtly marked already mentioned referents in the speech of second generation speakers in the Netherlands. Also, shifts in the use of classifier and demonstrative constructions were investigated as carriers of definite meanings. The data showed clear generation effects, especially in the use of classifier and demonstrative constructions, but no location effects. Although the interpretation of the data is compromised by the fact that Wenzhounese as spoken China is under threat, the study suggests that innovations found in heritage speakers may not necessarily be related to the heritage scenario, but can also reflect more general contact effects or internally motivated changes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Cross-linguistic influence and change across the lifespan
    • 2.2Definiteness marking, language contact and bilingual acquisition
    • 2.3Definiteness marking in heritage languages
    • 2.4Definiteness marking on already mentioned nouns in Wenzhounese Chinese and Dutch
    • 2.5Present study
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Traces of Contact corpus
    • 3.3Coding
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (34)
References
Aalberse, S., Zou, Y. & Andringa, S. 2017. Extended use of demonstrative pronouns in two generations of Mandarin Chinese speakers in the Netherlands. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In Honor of Aafke Hulk [Studies in Bilingualism 52], E. Blom, L. Cornips & J. Schaeffer (eds), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agnihotri, R. K., Khanna, A. L. & Mukherjee, A. 1984. The use of articles in Indian English: Errors and pedagogical implications. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 22(2): 115–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backus, A., Doğruöz, A. S. & Heine, B. 2011. Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs. diachronic contact situations. Language Sciences 33(5): 738–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68: 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. 2002. Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(3): 451–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. & Sybesma, R. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds), 259–292. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, J. & Slabakova, R. 2014. Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research 30(2): 159–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H. Y., Lee, O. S. & Lee, M. 2011. An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2): 223–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. 2008. Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua 118(4): 577–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, G. & Schnell, S. 2010. Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical Relations and Animacy in Discourse). Pdf Manual Version 7. <[URL]>
Heim, I. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds), 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huebner, T. 1983. A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12(1): 3–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, B., Lalleman, J. & Muysken, P. 1981. The alternation hypothesis: Acquisition of Dutch word order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers. Language Learning 31(2): 315–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. 2008. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, L. 2002. Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. Contributions to the Sociology of Language 86: 285–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kharma, N. 1981. Analysis of the errors committed by Arab university students in the use of the English definite/indefinite articles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 19(1–4): 333–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. 1995. Recommendations for data collection for gesture studies. In Extensions of Space and Beyond: Manual for Field Elicitation for the 1995 Field Season, D. Wilkins (ed.), 35–42. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Master, P. A. 1987. A Cross-Linguistic Interlanguage Analysis of the Acquisition of the English Article System. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayo, M. D. P. G. & Hawkins, R. (eds). 2009. Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Ionin, T. 2012. Dominant language transfer in Spanish heritage speakers and second language learners in the interpretation of definite articles. The Modern Language Journal 96(1): 70–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, F. 2016. Dynamics of Ambon Malay: Comparing Ambon and the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pires, A. & Rothman, J. 2009. Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 211–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2006. Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14(2): 191–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez, L. 2004. Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 147–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. 2011. Contact x time: External factors and variability in L1 attrition. Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos. In Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos. In Honour of Kees de Bot [Studies in Bilingualism 43], M. S. Schmid & W. Lowie (eds), 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sloetjes, H. & Wittenburg, P. 2008. Annotation by Category: ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), 816–820. <[URL]>
R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]>
Thomas, M. 1989. The acquisition of English articles by first-and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 10(3): 335–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1979. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Schmitt, Elena & Anastasia Sorokina
2024. Guest editorial: Language attrition – a comprehensive introduction. The Language Learning Journal 52:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Heritage languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue