In:Heritage Languages: A language contact approach
Suzanne Aalberse, Ad Backus and Pieter Muysken
[Studies in Bilingualism 58] 2019
► pp. xi–xii
Published online: 28 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.58.lot
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.58.lot
List of tables
Table 1.1Key dimensions of HLs cited by different authors11
Table 1.2Well-known scenarios from the language contact literature, with potential links to the study of heritage languages12
Table 2.1Features of different varieties related to the Dutch diaspora28
Table 2.2Canadian Italian vocabulary in Toronto (based on Danesi, 1984)33
Table 2.3Canadian Portuguese vocabulary in Winnipeg (based on Mota, 1997)33
Table 3.1Generational shift in Turkish Dutch communities53
Table 5.1A number of earlier studies and the data collection methods used95
Table 6.1The types of stability and change possible on the level of the individual and of the community (based on Labov, 1994)132
Table 6.2American Russian: Continuum of speakers (based on Polinsky, 2006, p. 253)136
Table 8.1The predictions of the umbrella hypothesis (adapted from Laleko & Polinsky (2016)168
Table 8.2Utterances used progressively with less context174
Table 8.3Utterances used progressively with more context174
Table 8.4Bilingual grammar compared to monolingual grammar177
Table 8.5Tableau for monolinguals in a less context situation177
Table 8.6Continuum between different models181
Table 10.1Census of 1981 and 2000/01 (adapted from Maurer, 1988, p. 143 and Kester & Fun, 2012, p. 238)209
Table 10.2Papiamentu past participle formation strategies218
