In:Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 203–227
Chapter 8Proficiency and transfer effects in the acquisition of gender agreement by L2 and L3 English learners
Published online: 16 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.08ima
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.08ima
Abstract
The present study examines proficiency and transfer effects in the acquisition of gender agreement in third person singular possessives (his/her) by second (L2) and third language (L3) learners of English. Within current generative second language acquisition research, gender agreement has been found to be a complicated feature to acquire for non-native language learners. A group of Basque/Spanish speakers (n = 117) and a group of Spanish speakers (n = 70) divided into three proficiency levels (elementary, intermediate and advanced) completed two written (a fill in the gap task and a written description task) two oral production tasks (an oral elicitation and a picture description). Our findings show that previous linguistic knowledge and proficiency level in English seem to have an influence on the type of errors attested in the L2 and the L3 groups.
Keywords: agreement, Basque, EFL, English, gender, L2, L3, possession, proficiency, Spanish
Article outline
- The present study
- Participants
- Experimental materials and tasks
- Procedure
- Data coding
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
Notes References
References (38)
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L. and Stavrov, M. (2007) Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Alonso, R. (Ed.). (2016). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ambadiang, T. (1999). La flexión nominal: Género y número. Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 3, 4843–4914.
Antón-Méndez, I. (2010). Whose? L2 English speakers’ possessive pronoun gender errors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 318–331.
Artiagoitia, X. (2009). Jabetza-GenitiboarenSintaxia eta ErkatzeAnizkuna (The syntax and the multiple comparison of the genitive-possession). EHU manuscript.
(2011). Izena (the noun). SarekoEuskalGramatika (The online Basque grammar). University of the Basque Country. <[URL]> (13 October, 2015).
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Amaro, J. F., & Rothman, J. (2015). The relationship between L3 transfer and structural similarity across development: Raising across an experiencer in Brazilian Portuguese. In H. Peukert (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 21–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cardinaletti, A. (1998). On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems. In A. Alexiadou & C. Wilder (Eds.) Possessors, predicates, and movement in the DP (pp.17–54) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48(2–3), 185–219.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–17.
García Mayo, M. P., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (Eds.). (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
García Mayo, M. P., & Slabakova, R. (2015). Object drop in L3 acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 483–498.
González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2016). Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental prediction and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism..
Hermas, A. (2014). Restrictive relatives in L3 English: L1 transfer and ultimate attainment convergence. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(3), 361–387.
Holderness, J., & Hughes, A. (1997). 100+ ideas for children: Topic-based activities. Newcastle upon Tyne: Macmillan/Heinemann.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd Edition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Picallo, M. C., & Rigau, G. (1999). El posesivo y las relaciones posesivas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 973–1023) Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Pozzan, L., & Antón-Méndez, I. (2017). English possessive gender agreement in production and comprehension. Similarities and differences between young monolingual English learners and adult Mandarin-English second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 985–1017.
Rothman, J. (2010). On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48(2–3), 243–271.
Slabakova, R. (2016). The scapel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 651–665. .
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). The L3 syntax-discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 130–144.
(2017). Testing the currrent models of third language acquisition. In T. Agelovka & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
White, J. (2008). Speeding up acquisition of his and her: Explicit L1/L2 contrasts help. In J. Philip, R. Oliver, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner. Child’s play? (pp. 193–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
White, J., & Ranta, L. (2002). Examining the interface between metalinguistic task performance and oral production in a second language. Language Awareness, 11(4), 259–290.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Barberán-Recalde, María Tania & María Basterrechea
2025. Integration of Grammar Instruction and Task-Based Interaction with Young EFL Learners: An Investigation into the Use of English Possessive Determiners (His/Her). In Investigating Attention to Form and Individual Differences:Research with EFL Children [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
SÓLYOM, CSILLA IBOLYA
Luquin, María & María del Pilar García Mayo
Mayo, María del Pilar García & María Luquin
2023. Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs?. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
