Cover not available

In:Bilingual Cognition and Language: The state of the science across its subfields
Edited by David Miller, Fatih Bayram, Jason Rothman and Ludovica Serratrice
[Studies in Bilingualism 54] 2018
► pp. 205–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Syntactic representations in late learners of a second language

A learning trajectory

 | University of Antwerp
 | Ghent University
Published online: 8 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.10ber
Abstract
Several studies have shown that syntactic structures can be primed between the different languages of a bilingual. Bilingual production models put forward by Hartsuiker, Pickering, and Veltkamp (2004) and Pickering and Hartsuiker (2008) therefore assume that bilinguals share syntactic structures between languages as much as possible. In this paper, we discuss a model for the development of these shared syntactic structures in late learners of a second language (Hartsuiker & Bernolet, 2017). More specifically, we discuss evidence for three central claims of the model, namely that (1) L2 syntactic representations move from being item-specific to being more abstract, (2) L2 representations become more and more integrated with existing L1 representations, and (3) L1 influences on syntactic processing and production in the L2 occur in early and late phases of L2 syntactic development. Summarizing, syntactic representations in L2 learners differ according to the L2 proficiency of the learner and the syntax of his/her native language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A model of the trajectory of late L2 syntactic acquisition
  • 3. Key claims of the model
    • 3.1L2 syntactic representations in late learners move from being item-specific to being more abstract
    • 3.2Across the learning trajectory, L2 representations become more and more integrated with existing L1 representations
    • 3.3L1 influences on syntactic processing and production in the L2 occur in the earliest phase as well as in the final phase of L2 syntactic development
  • 4. General discussion
  • References
References (26)
References
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., & Smith, S. D. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Collina, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). The persistence of syntactic priming revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 99–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931 – 949.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Effects of phonological feedback on the selection of syntax: Evidence from between-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 503–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., Yan, H., & Branigan, H. P. (2011). Lexical and syntactic representations between closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 431 – 445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming Syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234 – 272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golestani, N., Alario, F. X., Meriaux, S., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C. (2006). Syntax production in bilinguals. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1029 – 1040. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R., & Bernolet, S. (2017). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 219–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409 – 414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128, 479 – 489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). Between- and within- language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276 – 290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 149 – 154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179 – 207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 94–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633 – 651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217 – 243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Runnqvist, E., Gollan, T. H., Costa, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2013). A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages. Cognition, 129, 256 – 263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2007). Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 627 – 660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153 – 171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2012). Syntactic processing in Korean-English. Cognition, 112, 175 – 180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thierry, G., & Sanoudaki, E. (2013). Activation syntaxique non-sélective à la langue chez le bilingue précoce. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XVII-2, 33–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43 – 74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Dijkstra, T. (2010). Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support for psycholinguistic models. Brain Research Reviews, 64, 104 – 122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughan-Evans, A., Kuipers, J. R., Thierry, G., & Jones, M. W. (2014). Anomalous transfer of syntax between languages. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 8333–8335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Hervé, Coralie & Laurel Lawyer
2025. Bilinguals’ sensitivity to specificity and genericity: evidence from implicit and explicit knowledge. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 28:2 ► pp. 522 ff. DOI logo
Knop, Sabine De
2025. Construction-Based Language Learning and Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 596 ff. DOI logo
Serratrice, Ludovica, Marta Wesierska, Vanessa Cieplinska & Katherine Messenger
2025. Teenage kicks: Exploring shared syntax through bidirectional crosslinguistic priming. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Şafak, Duygu F. & Holger Hopp
2025. Learning L2 grammar from prediction errors? Verb biases in structural priming in comprehension and production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alzahrani, Alaa
2023. LexArabic: A receptive vocabulary size test to estimate Arabic proficiency. Behavior Research Methods 56:6 ► pp. 5529 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger & Carrie N. Jackson
2023. Asymmetrical effects of cross-linguistic structural priming on cross-linguistic influence in L2 learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
van Lieburg, Rianne, Robert Hartsuiker & Sarah Bernolet
2023. The production preferences and priming effects of Dutch passives in Arabic/Berber–Dutch and Turkish–Dutch heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:4 ► pp. 695 ff. DOI logo
van Lieburg, Rianne, Edwige Sijyeniyo, Robert J. Hartsuiker & Sarah Bernolet
2023. The development of abstract syntactic representations in beginning L2 learners of Dutch. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 7:3 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Tusun, Alimujiang
2022. Uyghur–Chinese Adult Bilinguals’ Construal of Voluntary Motion Events. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Tusun, Alimujiang
2023. Uyghur–Chinese early successive adult bilinguals’ construal of caused motion events. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Yossatorn, Yossiri, Theerapong Binali, Sirisira Chokthawikit & Cathy Weng
2022. Thai EFL University Students’ Productions of the English Past Counterfactuals and Their Influences from Interlanguage Fossilization. Sage Open 12:1 DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Stephen Skalicky & YeonJoo Jung
2020. The Role of Linguistic Alignment on Question Development in Face‐to‐Face and Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication Contexts: A Conceptual Replication Study. Language Learning 70:3 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Serratrice, Ludovica
2020. Lessons from studying language development in bilingual children. In Current perspectives on child language acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 27], ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Serratrice, Ludovica
2022. What can syntactic priming tell us about crosslinguistic influence?. In Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 31], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Vaughan-Evans, Awel, Simon P. Liversedge, Gemma Fitzsimmons & Manon W. Jones
2020. Syntactic co-activation in natural reading. Visual Cognition 28:10 ► pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
Vaughan-Evans, Awel, Maria Carmen Parafita Couto, Bastien Boutonnet, Noriko Hoshino, Peredur Webb-Davies, Margaret Deuchar & Guillaume Thierry
2020. Switchmate! An Electrophysiological Attempt to Adjudicate Between Competing Accounts of Adjective-Noun Code-Switching. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue