Cover not available

In:Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 303–330

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The L2 acquisition of the French quantitative pronoun en by L1 learners of Dutch

Vulnerable domains and cross-linguistic influence

 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Geneva | University of Zurich (URPP Language and Space)
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.14sle
Abstract
Success or failure in L2 acquisition has been attributed to different factors, such as the linguistic domain involved, (the absence of) instruction or positive or negative transfer. Whereas in most of the literature these factors are studied separately, in this paper we investigate the relative impact of each of them, analyzing the L2 acquisition of the French quantitative pronoun en by native speakers of Dutch. On the basis of acquisition data elicited in a Grammaticality Judgment Task, we show that the L2 acquisition of en proceeds very slowly. We argue that this is mainly caused by the presence of a similar, but not completely equivalent pronoun in Dutch.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical analyses of en
    • 2.1The interpretation of en
    • 2.2Referential and non-referential des-phrases
    • 2.3The presence/omission of en
  • 3.Modules of grammar, instruction and cross-linguistic influence
    • 3.1The Interface Hypothesis
    • 3.2Instruction
    • 3.3Cross-linguistic influence
  • 4.Experimental study
    • 4.1Research questions and predictions
    • 4.2Methodology
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2The test
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Overall results
    • 5.2Modules of grammar
    • 5.3Referentiality
    • 5.4Comparison of the French and the Dutch data
      • 5.4.1Contexts where en/er behave the same
      • 5.4.2Contexts in which en/er differ
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 273–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berends, S., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2016). The emergence of the pronouns Dutch er and French en in child L1 and the role of complexity. In E. Aboh (Ed.), Complexity in human language. Special issue of Language Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (2002). Adjectives, number, and interfaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuza, A. (2012). Cross-linguistic influence at the syntax proper: Interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(1), 71–96 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavarró, A., Guasti, M. T., Tuller, L., Prévost, P., Belletti, A., Cilibrasi, L., Delage, H., & Vernice, M. (2011). The acquisition of partitive clitics in Romance five-year-olds. Iberia, 3(2), 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, M. (1973). On grammatical reference. In F. Kiefer & N. Ruwet (Eds.), Generative grammar in Europe (pp. 203–217). Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulk, A. (1982). Het clitisch pronomen en. Een dwarsdoorsnede van de Franse syntaxis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Parameter setting and the acquisition of word order in L2 French. Second Language Research, 7, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulk, A. & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual First Language Acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 227–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihsane, T. (2013). EN pronominalisation in French and the structure of nominal expressions. Syntax, 16(3), 217–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihsane, T., Forel, C. & Kusseling, F. (2015). Taking discourse into account: the limits of substitution rules in the treatment of the pronoun en . Linguistica Atlantica, 34(1), 17–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1977). Syntaxe du français. Le cycle transformationnel. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranendonk, H. (2010). Quantificational constructions in the nominal domain: Facets of Dutch microvariation. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2011). Who is the interface hypothesis about? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 48–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, J. -C. (1978). De la syntaxe à l’interprétation. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, N. & Hulk, A. (2001). Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platzack, C. (2001). The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language, 77, 364–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, J. -Y. (1998). On the syntax of subnominal clitics: cliticization and ellipsis. Syntax, 1(3), 300–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2008). How pragmatically odd! Interface delays and pronominal subject distribution in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1(2), 317–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kemchinsky, P. & Rothman, J. (2012). Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sleeman, P. (1996). Licensing empty nouns in French. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Subnominal empty categories as subordinate topics. In M. Coene & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), From NP to DP (Vol. 1, pp. 119–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). L2 acquisition of clitics: Old French as an interlanguage. In V. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarró, & J. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar (pp. 389–416). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sleeman, P., & Hulk, A. (2013). L1 acquisition of noun ellipsis in French and in Dutch: Consequences for linguistic theory. In S. Baauw, F. A. C. Drijkoningen, L. Meroni, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from “Going Romance” Utrecht 2011 (pp. 249–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2000). Introduction: Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 93–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Selective optionality in language development. In L. E. A. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 55–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, T., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating Interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, T., Sorace, A., Heycock, C., & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valois, D., & Royle, P. (2009). Partitivity, atomization, and N-Drop: A Longitudinal study of French child language. Language Acquisition, 16(2), 82–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weskott, T., & Fanselow, G. (2011). On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability. Language, 87, 249–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (2011a). The interface hypothesis: How far does it extend? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 108–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121(4), 577–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wust, V. (2009). A la recherche des clitiques perdus: The dictogloss as a measure of the comprehension of y and en by L2 learners of French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 471–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Sleeman, Petra
2024. The Partitive Pronoun ER in Two National Varieties of Standard Dutch . In Partitive Constructions and Partitive Elements Within and Across Language Borders in Europe , DOI logo
Tamm, Anne
2024. Methodological solutions for researching the variation of partitives in languages with rich nominal morphology. Linguistic Variation 24:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
2020. Convergence and divergence in the expression of partitivity in French, Dutch, and German . Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 767 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue