Cover not available

In:Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 207–230

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Subtle aspectual differences in the L2 acquisition of German

The case of the present tense and pseudo-progressive am + infinitive and beim + infinitive constructions

 | University of Reading
 | University of Reading
 | University of Reading
 | Indiana University
 | University of Reading
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.10mil
Abstract
We examine the acquisition of progressivity in the German simple present tense (GPT) and related constructions by English natives of L2 German, under the guise of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis. German lacks an explicit gerundial form; the AM + infinitive (am) and BEIM + infinitive (beim) constructions express progressivity, along with the GPT. Although semantically the am and beim constructions map to the English copula + gerund, their unique syntax creates grammaticality differences. We employ three experiments testing (1) the acquisition of the aspectual properties of the GPT, and knowledge of the (2) semantic distribution of, and (3) syntax of am and beim. Data from a control group (n = 25) and adult L2s (n = 20) suggest adult L2 feature reassembly is possible, albeit complicated.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Progressive aspect in German and English present tense
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants and procedure
    • 3.2Experiment 1
      • Progressive
      • Habitual
      • Futurate
      • 3.2.1Experiment 2
      • 3.2.2Experiment 3
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Experiment 1
      • Experiment 1 discussion
    • 4.2Experiment 2
      • Natives
      • L2ers
      • Experiment 2 discussion
    • 4.3Experiment 3
      • Experiment 3 discussion
    • 4.4Summary of results
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bárta, M. (2014). Funktionen und Eigenschaften der Tempora in der deutschen Sprache: Randphänomene wie das doppelte Perfekt, der (ober) deutsche Präteritumschwund, der am-Progressiv und die tun-Periphrase. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrie, M., & Spreng, B. (2009). Noun incorporation and the progressive in German. Lingua, 119(2), 374–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangold, M., & Dudenredaktion (Bibliographisches Institut). (2005). Duden Aussprachewörterbuch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürich, K. (2005). The acquisition of the English tense and aspect system by German adult learners. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Chemnitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, K. H. (1996). Progressive aspect in German and Dutch. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 1(1), 41–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flecken, M. (2011). Event conceptualization by early Dutch–German bilinguals: Insights from linguistic and eye-tracking data. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 61–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabriele, A., Alemán Bañón, J., Prego, B. L., & Canales, A. (2015). Examining the influence of transfer and prototypes on the acquisition of the present progressive in L2 Spanish. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp. 113–152) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Fafulas, S. (2012). Variation of the simple present and present progressive forms: A comparison of native and non-native speakers. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 179–196). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. C. (2007). Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A. (2000). Verb semantics and the acquisition of tense‐aspect in L2 English. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 249–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köster, R., & Köster, R. (2007). Duden Redensarten: Herkunft und Bedeutung. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krause, O. (1997). Progressiv-Konstruktionen im Deutschen im Vergleich mit dem Niederländischen. Englischen und Italienischen. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 50, 48–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Gonzalez Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J. (2016). Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications? Second Language Research. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2008). Why all counter‐evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis in second language acquisition is not equal or problematic. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1063–1088. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, A., & Pierce, M. (2015). German studies: Language and linguistics. The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies, 75(2013), 407–420.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense‐aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48(2), 279–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue