Cover not available

In:Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 49–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Semantic prediction in monolingual and bilingual children

 | Radboud University Nijmegen
 | Koç University
 | Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey | Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.04bro
Abstract
One of the mechanisms responsible for the fast recognition of spoken language is prediction. This study examined whether 4–5 year old monolingual children differ from bilingual children in predicting the upcoming noun on the basis of the lexical semantics of the verb. In an eye-tracking task, we presented visual displays with two objects (e.g. cake, tree) while presenting semantically constraining (e.g. The boy eats the big cake) or neutral sentences (e.g. The boy sees the big cake). Results showed that both groups are able to predict but that 4-year-old bilinguals are faster than their monolingual peers. Moreover, sentence prediction ability in bilinguals is associated with performance on the forward digit recall task. These results extend views on bilingual sentence processing.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Material
    • Norming task
    • Linguistic and cognitive tasks
    • Procedure
  • Results
    • Linguistic and cognitive data
    • Eye-tracking data
    • Prediction ability
    • Time course of prediction ability
    • Individual differences
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
References (51)
References
Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80, 207–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alloway, T. P. (2007). Automated Working Memory Assessment (AWMA). London: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Research timeline: Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44, 36–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(04), 525–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Viswanathan, M. (2009). Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112, 494–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, W. B. T., Küntay, A. C., Messer, M. H., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 105–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonifacci, P., Giombini, L., Bellocchi, S., & Contento, S. (2011). Speed of processing, anticipation, inhibition and working memory in bilinguals. Developmental Science, 14(2), 256–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.17. Retrieved 21 April 2016 from <[URL]>
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K., (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damhuis, R., De Glopper, K., Boers, M., & Kienstra, M. (1992). Woordenlijst voor 4- tot 6-jarigen: Een streeflijst voor kleuters. Rotterdam: CED Groep – Het Projectbureau OVB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P., Puglisi, M., Cruz-Santos, A., Befi-Lopes, D. M., & Martin, R. (2014). Effects of impoverished environmental conditions on working memory performance. Memory, 22(4), 323–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. (2011). Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect? Memory, 19, 529–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain Language, 115, 149–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedorenko, E. (2014). The role of domain-general cognitive control in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I. A. Sekerina, E. M. Fernandez, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing (pp. 97–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40(5), 1461–1469.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 119–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28, 191–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J. (2014). The role of discourse-level expectations in non-native speakers’ referential choices. In W. Orman & M. J. Valleau (Eds.), BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 179–191). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 80–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460–482. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., Olivers, C. N. L., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 137, 138–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, F. T., & Snider, N. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, E. K. (2005). Grammatical gender and early word recognition in Dutch. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (Volume 1, pp. 320–330). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? In L. Dekydtspotter & C. Renaud (Eds.), Parsing to learn. Special issue of Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 193–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 447–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. -R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism, 11, 81–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Freidman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 114(2), 187–202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Investigating individual differences in children’s real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 314–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swingley, D., Pinto, J. P., & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition, 71, 73–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2004). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test (3rd ed., Dutch version). Amsterdam: Harcourt Test.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Bosch, Jasmijn E. & Francesca Foppolo
2024. Prediction during spoken language processing in monolingual and multilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
van Dijk, Chantal, Jasmijn Bosch & Sharon Unsworth
2024. Language processing in bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Chun, Eunjin, Si Chen, Shulin Liu & Angel Chan
2021. Influence of syntactic complexity on second language prediction. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2021. Prediction in bilingual children. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2025. Child heritage speakers’ reading skills in the majority language and exposure to the heritage language support morphosyntactic prediction in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stern, Michael C., LeeAnn Stover, Ernesto Guerra & Gita Martohardjono
2021. Syntactic and Semantic Influences on the Time Course of Relative Clause Processing: The Role of Language Dominance. Brain Sciences 11:8 ► pp. 989 ff. DOI logo
Theimann, Ane, Ekaterina Kuzmina & Pernille Hansen
2021. Verb-Mediated Prediction in Bilingual Toddlers. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Stern, Michael C., Christen N. Madsen, LeeAnn M. Stover, Cass Lowry & Gita Martohardjono
2019. Language history attenuates syntactic prediction in L1 processing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue