Cover not available

In:Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 25–48

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Extended use of demonstrative pronouns in two generations of Mandarin Chinese speakers in the Netherlands

Evidence of convergence?

 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.03aal
Abstract
This study investigated the use of demonstratives in encoding already mentioned referents in two generations of Mandarin Chinese speakers in the Netherlands. Data from twelve families was compared to baseline data from eight native controls in China. Previous literature suggests that languages without dedicated morphology to encode definiteness might develop such morphemes in contact with a language with articles (cf. Backus, Doğruöz, & Heine, 2011). Demonstrative pronouns may be reinterpreted as articles and this process could result in an increase in demonstrative use. We accordingly expected to find such an increase in Mandarin Chinese spoken in the Netherlands and found confirmation for this in both generations of speakers. A preference for the distal demonstrative was observed only in the second generation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Definiteness marking and cross-linguistic influence
    • 2.2Definiteness marking in heritage languages
    • 2.3Definiteness marking in Dutch and Mandarin Chinese
    • 2.4The current study
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Coding
    • 3.4Analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (53)
References
Arends, J., Muysken, P., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (1995). Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agnihotri, R. K., Khanna, A. L., & Mukherjee, A. (1984). The use of articles in Indian English: Errors and pedagogical implications. IRAL, 22(2), 115–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backus, A., Doğruöz, A. S., & Heine, B. (2011). Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs. diachronic contact situations. Language Sciences 33(5), 738–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). Ime4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0999375–38. <[URL]>
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breu, W. (2003). Der indefinite Artikel in slavischen Mikrosprachen: Grammatikalisierung im totalen Sprachkontakt. Slavistische Linguistik 2001, 27–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(03), 451–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. S. C., & Sybesma, R. (2005). Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 259–292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, P. (2004). Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics, 42(6), 1129–1184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, J., & Slabakova, R. (2014). Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research, 30(2), 159–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2013). Late language acquisition and identity construction: Variation in use of the Dutch definite determiners de and het . In P. Auer, J. C. Reina & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives IV: Selected papers from the Sixth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 6), Freiburg, June 2011 (pp. 57–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, E. (2007). The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 19(04), 275–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L. (2008). Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 118(4), 577–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1978). How does a language acquire gender markers. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, 3 (pp. 47–82). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, G., & Schnell, S. (2015). Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical Relations and Animacy in Discourse). Pdf Manual Version 7.0. Bamberg: OPUS. <urn:nbn:de:bvb:473-opus4-262354> (21 December, 2016).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, S. (1999). The emergence of a grammatical category definite article in spoken Chinese. Journal of pragmatics, 31(1), 77–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(03), 227–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2009). Article use and generic reference: Parallels between L1-and L2-acquisition. In M. del P. Garcia Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 147–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(03), 337–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2012). That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 69–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, B., Lalleman, J., & Muysken, P. (1981). The alternation hypothesis: acquisition of Dutch word order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers. Language Learning, 31(2), 315–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, L. (2002). Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 86, 285–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kharma, N. (1981). Analysis of the errors committed by Arab university students in the use of the English definite/indefinite articles. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 19(1–4), 333–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (1995). Recommendations for data collection for gesture studies. In D. Wilkins (Ed.), Extensions of space and beyond: Manual for field elicitation for the 1995 field season (pp. 35–42). Nijmegen: Max Placnk Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., & Muysken, P. (2016). Cross-linguistic priming in bilinguals: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language processing, acquisition, and change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lötzsch, R., (1996). Interferenzbedingte grammatische Konvergenzen und Divergenzen zwischen Sorbisch und Jiddisch. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 49, 50–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2009). Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Master, P. A. (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Ionin, T. (2012). Dominant language transfer in Spanish heritage speakers and second language learners in the interpretation of definite articles. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 70–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, F. (2016). Dynamics of Ambon Malay: Comparing Ambon and the Netherlands. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(04), 709–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piwek, P., Beun, R. J., & Cremers, A. (2008). ‘Proximal’and ‘distal’in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 694–718. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philippa, M., Debrabandere, F., & Quak, A. (2003). Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands, Deel 1: A t/m E. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 211–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14(2), 191–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2011). Contact x time: External factors and variability in L1 attrition. In M. S. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos (pp. 155–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008, May). Annotation by Category: ELAN and ISO DCR. In LREC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua, 119(3), 460–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sybesma, R. P. E. (1992). Causatives and accomplishments: The case of Chinese ba (Vol. 1). Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2009). Accounting for patterns of article omissions and substitutions in second language production. In M. del P. Garcia Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 115–143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first-and second-language learners. Applied psycholinguistics, 10(03), 335–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, J. (2015). A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Martynova, Maria, Onur Özsoy, Vasiliki Rizou, Luka Szucsich, Natalia Gagarina & Artemis Alexiadou
2025. Demonstratives in heritage Greek, Russian, and Turkish in Germany and the United States. International Journal of Bilingualism 29:5 ► pp. 1235 ff. DOI logo
Kupisch, Tanja & Maria Polinsky
2022. Language history on fast forward: Innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangling, Ziyin Mai, Qiuyun Cai, Yuqing Liang & Virginia Yip
2022. Reference production in Mandarin–English bilingual preschoolers: Linguistic, input, and cognitive factors. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Kupisch, Tanja
2021. Heritage Languages in Europe. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Aalberse, Suzanne, Sible Andringa, Martina Faber & Phine Lippe
2020. Definiteness in Wenzhounese Chinese in the Netherlands and in China. In Lost in transmission [Studies in Bilingualism, 59], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Ortega, Lourdes
2020. The Study of Heritage Language Development From a Bilingualism and Social Justice Perspective. Language Learning 70:S1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Shi
2020. Does extensive L2 exposure trigger L1 attrition of perfective and durative aspect marking in Mandarin Chinese?. In Lost in transmission [Studies in Bilingualism, 59], ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Heritage languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Heritage Languages around the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue