Cover not available

In:Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 145–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
‘It starts to explode.’ Phasal segmentation of contextualised events in L2 English

 | University of York
Published online: 15 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.06van
En route to acquiring novel principles of temporal information organisation in the target language, second language (L2) learners exhibit a capacity to build temporal constructions of their own, which are not necessarily fixed in the principles of either their source or their target language system. This study surveys hitherto unattested interlanguage phenomena found in the phasal segmentation patterns of two intermediate-level learner groups with unrelated source languages, and identifies analogies of shared developmental patterns. Film verbalisations and acceptability judgements (AJ) were used to elicit responses from Czech and Hungarian intermediate learners of English, and their analyses yielded a threefold benefit. They generated representative degrees of granularity for each group who experiment with new segmentation techniques. They also showed that the ways in which learners partition events in production (pronounced digression from the target) do not directly replicate patterns in acceptability judgements (closer approximation to the target). And thirdly, overlaps and contrasts between learner and native control speaker preferences for phasal partitioning varied in close relation to specific aspectual properties inherent to the verbs used. The combination of production features and acceptability judgements from L2 groups with distant L1s provides an informative mosaic of how learners at intermediate L2 proficiency strive for an optimal fit when combining available linguistic elements to express specific event phases.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Empirical context
    • 2.1Grammatical aspect and event segmentation across L1s
    • 2.2Research on event segmentation in learner varieties
  • 3.Central notions and theoretical grounding
  • 4.Structural contrasts in the source and the target languages
  • 5.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 6.Method
    • 6.1Participants
    • 6.2Instruments
    • 6.3Analysis
  • 7.Results
    • 7.1Production
    • 7.2Acceptability judgements
  • 8.Discussion
    • 8.1Learner-specific modification of granularity degrees
    • 8.2Non-standard decomposition of events – overgeneralised inceptive phase marking
    • 8.3Discrepancy between acceptability judgements and production
    • 8.4Variation in judgements linked to verb type
    • 8.5L1-specific segmentation and its influence on L2
    • 8.6Limitations and avenues for future inquiry
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (58)
References
Abondolo, D. 1998. Hungarian. In The Uralic Languages, D. Abondolo (ed.), 428–456. Routledge: London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, D. 2004. Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A crosslinguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The relationship between form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 253–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. & Slobin, D. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 1982. On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics 3: 181–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J. & Kita, S. 2011. The macro-event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 43–67. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Trusova, E. 2003. Cross-linguistic differences in the representation of events: Verb aspect and completion in English and Russian. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (eds), 13–19. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, E. 2011. Ultimate attainment of event segmentation and temporal structuring patterns in speakers of L2 Swedish. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 29–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2003. Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language–specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed), 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. 2003. Data collection in SLA research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 762–828. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, V. 2002. Background to the L2 user. In Portraits of the L2 User, V. Cook (ed), 1–28. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csirmaz, A. 2004. Perfective and imperfective in Hungarian: (Invisible) differences. In Proceedings of Console XII, S. Blaho, L. Vicente & M. de Vos (eds). University of Leiden. Presented at Console XII. Patras, Greece, December 12–14, 2003.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 164–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Sagarra, N. 2010. Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning 60(2): 85–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54: 227–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19], E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds), 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. 2013. The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 423–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H., Granfeldt, J., Bernardini, P. & Källkvist, M. 2014. Linguistic correlates to communicative proficiency levels of the CEFR. EUROSLA Yearbook 14: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habel, C. & Tape, H. 1999. Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In Processes in Language Production, R. Klabunde & C. von Stutterheim (eds), 117–153. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. 2006. Aspektus és akcióminőség: különös tekintettel a magyar nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart: With particular attention to Hungarian), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. 2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. 1997. The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. & von Stutterheim, C. 1987. Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen. Linguistische Berichte 109: 163–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. 1999. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The Neurocognition of Language, C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds), 83–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz Espinar, G. & Schneider, R. 2005. Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. 2014. The Bilingual Mind and What it Tells us about Language and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: differing logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed.), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Péter, M. 2008. Az aspektusról – más aspektusból (On aspect – from a different aspect). Magyar Nyelv 107: 428–452.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. 2004. Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, D. 2002. Czech. The Slavonic Languages, B. Comrie & G. Corbett (eds), 455–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2013. Traces of L1 patterns in the event construal of Czech advanced speakers of L2 English and L2 German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 87–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M. 2011. Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed.), 66–107. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2004. At the Same Time: The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 1996. The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 375–409. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, N., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J. 2003. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 3: 335-345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starren, M. 2001. The Second Time: The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series 50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. 2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & C. Madden (eds), 236–244. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takács, E. 2012. A progresszív jelentéstartalom konstruálásának sajátosságai a magyarban [Idiosyncracies of the progressive aspect in Hungarian]. Magyar Nyelvről 136: 325–335.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tolentino, L. & Tokowicz, N. 2011. Across languages, space and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 91–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. 1987. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed), 455–479. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. 2005. Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgement tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies 24: 129–167.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J. & Altmann, J. 2014. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanek, N. 2012. Language-specific perspectives in reference to time in the discourse of Czech, English and Hungarian speakers. In Space and Time in Languages and Cultures, 1: Linguistic Diversity [Human Cognitive Processing 36], L. Filipović & K. Jaszczolt (eds), 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A., Carroll, M. & Sahonenko, N. 2012. Grammaticalized temporal categories, language specificity, and macroplanning in expository texts. Linguistics 50: 341–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M. 2005. Cross–linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Nüse, R. 2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language–specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 41(5): 851–881.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zacks, J., Braver, T., Sheridan, M., Donaldson, D., Snyder, A., Ollinger, J., Buckner, R. & Raichle, M. 2001. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4(66): 651–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zacks, J. & Swallow, K. 2007. Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 80–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Vanek, Norbert
2024. Working Memory and English Language Learning: Implications for Classroom-Based Research. In Cognitive and Educational Psychology for TESOL [Springer Texts in Education, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Vanek, Norbert & Haoruo Zhang
2024. Event Boundaries Stretched and Compressed by Aspect: Temporal Segmentation in a First and a Second Language. Language Learning 74:S1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Mengmeng, Norbert Vanek & Leah Roberts
2021. Crosslinguistic influence on English and Chinese L2 speakers’ conceptualization of event series. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue