Cover not available

In:Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 53–73

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
The grammatical representation of aspect

Context-focused analysis of decontextualized prompt sentences

 | Rice University
Published online: 15 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.03sal
The construct of aspect spans a broad range of meanings, starting with the very basic description of temporality conveyed by the predicate alone (lexical aspect) to the maximum descriptive level of representation of temporality conveyed by discourse structures (narrativity) and pragmatics in general (viewpoint aspect). Given this multifaceted definition of aspect, it is important to assess whether the investigation of the second language acquisition of aspect takes into account such a complex construct. For instance, it is possible that – as they develop their knowledge of the target language – L2 learners gradually incorporate specific semantic, discursive and pragmatic information to their selection of morphological markings. As the range of information relevant to making use of aspectual distinctions expands, learners must reconcile possible contradicting pieces of information provided by the various complementary contextual levels of information. This chapter will describe the consequence of selecting specific ranges of meanings associated with a contextualized definition of aspect.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The original claim of Coppieters (1987)
    • 2.1The methodological approach of Coppieters’ study
    • 2.2The non-consequential effect of Coppieters’ findings
  • 3.How complex is the definition of aspect?
    • 3.1The effect of aspectual meanings beyond the theoretical construct of aspect
    • 3.2The broad representation of the theoretical construct Aspect
  • 4.Non-prototypical challenges brought up by context
    • 4.1Perfective as default for basic tense meanings
    • 4.2Imperfective as default for inanimate / non-agentive subjects
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (60)
References
Andersen, R. 1991. Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. The insider’s advantage. In Italiano lingua seconda/lingua straniera, A. Giacalone-Ramat & M. Vedovelli (eds), 1–26. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1995. A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 263–289 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt. In Aspectual Inquiries, P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (eds), 397–419. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, R. 1991. Time and the Verb. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 1992. Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68: 706–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisard, F. 2010. Aspects of virtuality in the meaning of the French imparfait. Linguistics 48(2): 487–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 1995. Spanish tense and aspect from a typological perspective. In Studies in Language Learning and Spanish Linguistics, P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado & M. van Naerssen (eds), 442–457. New York NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, N. 1997. A Motor- and Image-schematic Analysis of Aspectual Composition. Unpublished Manuscript. Berkeley CA: International Computer Science Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. 1987. Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 2009. Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In The Handbook of Language Teaching, M. Long & C. Doughty (eds), 119–138. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetre, I. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinsmore, J. 1991. Partitioned Representations: A Study in Mental Representation, Language Understanding and Linguistic Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Miguel, E. 1992. El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: Perfectividad e imperfectividad. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doiz-Bienzobas, A. 1995. The Preterite and the Imperfect in Spanish: Past Situation vs. Past Viewpoint. PhD dissertation, University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. The preterit and the imperfect as grounding predications. In Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, F. Brisard (ed.), 299–347. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, H. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Tense and Narrativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, E. & vanPutte, F. 1988. The value of contrast: Contrasting the value of strategies. International Review of Applied Linguistics 26: 263–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. & Pianesi, F. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güell, L. 1998. La adquisición del tiempo verbal en el aprendizaje del español como lengua extranjera. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. 1991. Spanish absolute constructions and aspect. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 45–92Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H. & Nef, F. 1981. Evènements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle. Langages 64: 39–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labeau, E. 2005. Beyond the Aspect Hypothesis: Tense-Aspect Development in Advanced L2 French. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laskuraín, P. 2005. Smith’s “The Parameter of Aspect:” The formal analysis of temporal meaning. Ms, University of Texas-Austin, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubbers-Quesada, M. 2006. L2 acquisition of temporal reference in Spanish and the interaction of adverbials, morphology and clause structure. In Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, N. Sagarra & J. Toribio (eds), 157–168. Sommervile MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luján, M. 1981. The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua 54: 165–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maingueneau, D. 1994. L’énonciation en linguistique française. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McManus, K. 2013. Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the Aspect Hypothesis? International Review of Applied Linguistics 51: 299–322.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. 1998. Aspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menéndez-Benito, P. 2002. Aspect and adverbial quantification in Spanish. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 32nd North Eastern Linguistics Society, Amherst, MA.
Michaelis, L. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. 2002. The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses Preterite and Imperfect. In The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax: The L1/L2 Connection, A.T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (eds), 115–151. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages [Studies in Bilingualism 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A., Cuza, A., Majzlanova, M. & Sánchez-Naranjo, J. 2008. Non-native recognition of the iterative and habitual meanings of Spanish preterite and imperfect tenses. In Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 432–451. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohde, H., Kehler, A. & Elman, J. 2006. Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In The Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, July 26–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. 1999. The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 20(2): 151–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Tense aspect in verbal morphology. Hispania 3(86): 559–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical Model. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish Preterit and Imperfect among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 184–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Contrasting Preterite and Imperfect use among advanced L2 learners: Judgments of iterated eventualities in Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics 54(1): 243–270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasse, H.J. 2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology 6(2): 199–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. 1992. Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. In Proceedings of NELS 22, K. Broderick (ed.), 411–426. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2002. Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: An embarrassment of riches? Second Language Research 18(2): 172–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. 2007. L2 acquisition at the grammar-discourse interface: Aspectual shifts in L2 Spanish. In Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 452–483. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1996. From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz, J. John & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, M. 1990. Impersonal se passives and the licensing of empty categories. Probus 2: 209–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varela, S. 1992. Verbal and adjectival participles in Spanish. In Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XIX, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 74], C. Laeufer & T.A. Morgan eds), 219–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagona, K. 1994. Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In Aspects of Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV, C. Parodi, C. Quicoli, M. Saltarelli & M. Zubizarreta (eds), (475–488). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mañas Navarrete, I., E. Rosado Villegas, S. Mujcinovic & N. Fullana Rivera
2025. Acquisition of modal readings of the Imperfect tense in L2 Spanish. Language Acquisition 32:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Salaberry, M. Rafael
2021. Expanding the Definition of Aspect in L2 Acquisition: Assessing Advanced Levels of Competence to Understand Aspectual Knowledge. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Amenós-Pons, José, Aoife Ahern & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2019. Feature reassembly across closely related languages: L1 French vs. L1 Portuguese learning of L2 Spanish Past Tenses. Language Acquisition 26:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue