In:Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
Edited by Patrick Rebuschat
[Studies in Bilingualism 48] 2015
► pp. 443–482
Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning
Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated
Published online: 24 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
More than a decade has passed since Norris and Ortega’s (2000) seminal meta-analysis on the effectiveness of instruction in L2 learning. This line of research has matured for another research synthesis, which led to the present meta-analytic review. Thirty-four unique sample studies, in each of which explicit and implicit instructional treatments were compared, were retrieved and included in the present meta-analysis: 11 studies from Norris and Ortega’s meta-analysis and 23 new studies published between 1999 and 2011. Overall, explicit instruction was found to have been more effective than implicit instruction. The effectiveness of implicit and explicit instruction in L2 development was also meta-analyzed in terms of several moderator variables. We discuss our results in comparison with Norris and Ortega’s findings.
References (97)
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.
Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? The Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63.
*Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning(pp. 259–302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
*Alcon, E.S. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33, 417–435.
Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
*Andringa, S.J., de Glopper, C.M., & Hacquebord, H.I. (2011). The effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 61, 868–903.
*Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of passé composé and imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 226–243.
*Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 187–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322–329.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H.R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
*Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V., & Valentine, J.C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit (October, 2008). StatNews # 73: Overlapping confidence intervals and statistical significance. Retrieved from [URL]
*de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–297.
de Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–755). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R.M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410.
. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.
. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.
. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–349). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R.M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438.
*de la Fuente, M.J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–295.
Dörnyei, Z., (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
*Doughty, C.J. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of second language relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.
. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 206–257). New York, NJ: Blackwell.
Doughty, C.J., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form acquisition. In C.J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Ellis, R (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368.
Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605–628.
*Fukuya, Y., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 478–500.
*Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497–545.
*Ghobadi, A., & Fahim, M. (2009). The effect of explicit teaching of English 'thanking formulas' on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System, 37, 526–537.
Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331–359.
Hedges, L. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128.
Hernández, T.A. (2008). The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students’ use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665–675.
. (2011). Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15, 159–182.
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.
Julious, S.A. (2004). Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 3, 217–222.
*Kang, H. (2010). Negative evidence and its explicitness and positioning in the learning of Korean as a heritage language. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 582–599.
Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
*Koike, D., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481–501.
*Kubota, M. (1994). The role of negative feedback on the acquisition of the English dative alternation by Japanese college students of EFL. Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 8, 1–36.
*Kubota, M. (1996). The effects of instruction plus feedback on Japanese university students of EFL: A pilot study. Bulletin of Chofu Gakuen Women’s Junior College, 18, 59–95.
*Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: a case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.
Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.
Lee, S.K., & Huang, H.T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307–331.
*Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners’ L2 development in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 49–68.
Li, S. (2009). The differential effects of implicit and explicit feedback on L2 learners of different proficiency levels. Applied Language Learning, 19, 53–79.
. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
*Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1–14
*Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M.H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357–371.
Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–323.
Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263–287.
. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
. (2004). Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 321–341.
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.
*Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y.J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33, 463–480.
Master, P. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mueller, C. (2010). Effects of explicit instruction on incidental noticing of metaphorical word sequences during a subsequent reading task. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 81–101.
*Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617–673.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Radwan, A. (2005). The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33, 69–87.
Reinders, H., & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of positive enhanced input on intake and L2 acquisition. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 281–302). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
*Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.
*Rosa, E.M., & Leow, R.P. (2004). Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269–292.
*Rosa, E.M., & O’Neill, M.D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511–556.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The ‘file drawer problem’ and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
*Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35–78.
*Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96–120.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning>. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.
*Scott, V.M. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 14–22.
*Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556–569.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73–87.
. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204.
*Tode, T. (2007). Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: the learning of the English copula be before and after the instruction of the auxiliary be. Language Teaching Research, 11, 11–30.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–241.
*VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510.
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (Eds.), SLA theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Varnosfadrani, A.D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37, 82–98.
White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C.J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85–113). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Cited by (134)
Cited by 134 other publications
Ayoun, Dalila
Boufahja, Ines, Blanka Klimova & Janet Wolf
Canals, Laia, Gisela Granena, Yucel Yilmaz & Aleksandra Malicka
Chen, Tsung-Ying
Dalman, Mohammadreza & Luke Plonsky
de Graaff, Rick & Leslie Piggott
Dempsey, Jack, Kiel Christianson & Julie A. Van Dyke
Fathi, Mohammad Javad, Reza Kafipour, Sara Kashefian-Naeeini & Zahra Shahsavar
Fernández Fuertes, Raquel & Eduardo Gómez Garzarán
Guerrero-Gomez, Janire, María Orcasitas-Vicandi & Marta Kopinska
Jiménez-López, Beatriz
Nyqvist, Eeva-Liisa, Anne-Maj Åberg & Siv Björklund
2025. Immersion teachers’ perspective on grammar instruction in language immersion in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 13:1 ► pp. 164 ff.
Papi, Mostafa & Phil Hiver
Roehr-Brackin, Karen, Karolina Baranowska, Renato Pavlekovic & Paweł Scheffler
Roehr-Brackin, Karen & Renato Pavlekovic
Róg, Tomasz
Róg, Tomasz
Tavares, Gabriela, Yuxin Ge, Susana Correia & Patrick Rebuschat
Tkacikova, V. & N. Tokowicz
van der Ploeg, Mara, Merel Keijzer & Wander Lowie
Chalmers, Hamish, Jess Brown & Anastasia Koryakina
Chong, Sin Wang, Melissa Bond & Hamish Chalmers
Henry, Nick, Briana Villegas & Kara Morgan-Short
Indrarathne, Bimali & Ganga Herath
Jach, Daniel
2024. What foreign language learners make of grammatical descriptions depends on description type, proficiency, and
context. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Khan, Afzal
Li, Fei & Yunmei Sun
Llompart, Miquel & Ewa Dąbrowska
Nissen, Shawn L., Rachel Kemmey & K. James Hartshorn
Ní Dhiorbháin, Aisling, Sylvaine Ní Aogáin & Pádraig Ó Duibhir
Preciado-Sánchez, Ana Mónica & José Luis Moreno-Vega
Rogers, John & Xiuli Yang
Rousse-Malpat, Audrey, Lise Koote, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Marjolijn Verspoor
Torres, Julio
2024. Heritage language education. In Multifaceted Multilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 66], ► pp. 270 ff.
Wlodarski, Nathalie & Philippa Bell
Yilmaz, Yucel, Senyung Lee & Yılmaz Köylü
2024. Isolated and combined effects of models and corrective feedback in the acquisition of the Turkish locative
morpheme. In Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 69], ► pp. 162 ff.
Zhang, Runhan & Yaping Chen
Šarić Šokčević, Ivana
Bovolenta, Giulia & John N. Williams
Gerits, Hedwig & Kris Van den Branden
2023. The acquisition of L2 Hungariangrammar rules and the implicit-explicit debate. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 174:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Hwang, Hyun–Bin
Kenanidis, Panagiotis, Ewa Dąbrowska, Miquel Llompart, Diana Pili-Moss & Claudia Felser
Kim, Kathy MinHye & Aline Godfroid
Koch, Eva M., Johanna F. de Vos, Alex Housen, Aline Godfroid & Kristin Lemhöfer
Michaud, Gabriel & Ahlem Ammar
Ní Dhiorbháin, Aisling
Rivera, Marta, Daniela Paolieri, Antonio Iniesta, Ana I Pérez & Teresa Bajo
Rodríguez-Tapia, Sergio
Veisi, Soheila & Reza Ghaffar Samar
2023. The neural correlates of second language syntax. Journal of Second Language Studies 6:1 ► pp. 146 ff.
卫, 孟欣
Azkarai, Agurtzane, Rhonda Oliver & Yohana Gil‐Berrio
Benati, Alessandro G.
2022. Can focus on form have an effect on language development?. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 257 ff.
Chen, Mo & Wenya Li
Fernández Fuertes, Raquel, Eduardo Gómez Garzarán, Sonja Mujcinovic & Iban Mañas Navarrete
M. STRATTON, JAMES
Stratton, James M.
Stratton, James M.
2025. Explicit pronunciation instruction in the second language classroom. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Moranski, Kara & Janire Zalbidea
Morgan‐Short, Kara, Irene Finestrat, Alicia Luque & David Abugaber
Ní Dhiorbháin, Aisling & Pádraig Ó Duibhir
Ranta, Leila
Rebuschat, Patrick
Rivera, Marta, Daniela Paolieri, Antonio Iniesta & Teresa Bajo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
Rousse-Malpat, Audrey, Rasmus Steinkrauss, Martijn Wieling & Marjolijn Verspoor
Spit, Sybren, Sible Andringa, Judith Rispens & Enoch O. Aboh
Toda-Cosi, Mireia
Vandommele, Goedele, Koen Van Gorp, Kris Van den Branden & Sven De Maeyer
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Yucel Yilmaz
Gao, Jianwu & Shuang Ma
Monaghan, Padraic, Simón Ruiz & Patrick Rebuschat
Roehr-Brackin, Karen, Gabriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérrez, Lexa Olivera-Smith & María Teresa Torres-Marín
Ruiz, Simón, Patrick Rebuschat & Detmar Meurers
Sendur, Kristin A., Jannet van Drie & Carla van Boxtel
Teixeira, Joana
2021. Can explicit instruction help L2 learners overcome persistent L1 interference?. In L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 65], ► pp. 229 ff.
Andringa, Sible
Bateman, Blair, Michael Child & Eliane Berlendis Bueno
2020. A focus on language in the immersion language arts curriculum. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 8:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Gómez-Garzarán, Eduardo & Raquel Fernández-Fuertes
2020. Is explicit instruction effective? The learning of English noun-noun and adjective-noun structures by L1 Spanish school children (¿Es efectiva la instrucción explícita? El aprendizaje de las estructuras nombre-nombre y adjetivo-nombre del inglés por escolares de L1 español). Culture and Education: Cultura y Educación 32:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Mahmoudi‐Gahrouei, Vahid, Manijeh Youhanaee & Dariush Nejadanasari
Maie, Ryo & Robert M. DeKeyser
Morgan-Short, Kara
Nevalainen, Terttu, Tanja Säily, Turo Vartiainen, Aatu Liimatta & Jefrey Lijffijt
Patsala, Paschalia & Maria Michali
Adrada-Rafael, Sergio
2019. Explicitness of deductive instruction and L2 development. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Ellis, Nick C. & Stefanie Wulff
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
Gris Roca, Joaquín
Ishikawa, Keiichi
Kachinske, Ilina & Robert DeKeyser
2019. The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language
acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Kachinske, Ilina & Robert DeKeyser
2021. The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language
acquisition. In Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning [Benjamins Current Topics, 116], ► pp. 33 ff.
Kang, Eun Young, Sarah Sok & ZhaoHong Han
Leow, Ronald P.
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
Monaghan, Padraic, Christine Schoetensack & Patrick Rebuschat
Pawlak, Mirosław
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
Saito, Kazuya & Luke Plonsky
YILMAZ, YUCEL & GISELA GRANENA
Yilmaz, Yucel & Gisela Granena
Yilmaz, Yucel & Ayşenur Sağdıç
2019. The interaction between inhibitory control and corrective feedback timing. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
Alonso-Aparicio, Irene
2018. The impact of prior knowledge on second language grammar practice. In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 49], ► pp. 143 ff.
GRAUS, JOHAN & PETER–ARNO COPPEN
Lin, Huifen, Tsuiping Chen & Hsien-Chin Liou
Rastelli, Stefano
Ruiz, Simón, Kaitlyn M. Tagarelli & Patrick Rebuschat
Spada, Nina
Spada, Nina
2025. Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 164 ff.
Wulff, Stefanie & Nick C. Ellis
2018. Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In
Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 37 ff.
Arroyo, Diana C. & Yucel Yilmaz
2017. The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions. In Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 71 ff.
Indrarathne, Bimali & Judit Kormos
Cerezo, Luis, Allison Caras & Ronald P. Leow
Cintrón-Valentín, Myrna C. & Nick C. Ellis
Godfroid, Aline
Godfroid, Aline
Goo, Jaemyung
2016. Corrective feedback and working memory capacity. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3], ► pp. 279 ff.
Gisela Granena, Long, Michael H. & Yucel Yilmaz
Long, Michael H.
Long, Michael H.
Martin, Ines A. & Carrie N. Jackson
Long, Mike
2015. TBLT. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
